• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Test the accuracy of your method to predict the winning number. If it works, then your system works. But tests over a few hundred spins tell you nothing.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PhP Pair-Completion

Started by TRD, Oct 08, 04:59 PM 2021

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

algojack

Quote from: TRD on Oct 13, 08:01 PM 2021
The first three tests would be

•   threshold for a SP to repeat, with spin-by-spin % distribution (SU= 29or30 spins)


I'll take them one at a time. What do you mean by a spin-by-spin-distribution?  A file with 10M cycles showing every spin would be far too big. What do you mean by "Threshold"? Is it the maximum number of spins before a split repeats?

Ross

Quote from: algojack on Oct 18, 03:16 AM 2021You're probably right. But where's the harm?

No harm at all!
Eighty- four and counting.  Is age an excuse?

TRD

Quote from: algojack on Oct 18, 03:20 AM 2021
I'll take them one at a time. What do you mean by a spin-by-spin-distribution?  A file with 10M cycles showing every spin would be far too big. What do you mean by "Threshold"? Is it the maximum number of spins before a split repeats?




What I mean is like redhot's post, just spins -- in essence this output format.
rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=26049.msg228070#msg228070

Total cycles
spin1  ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles
spin2  ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles 
spin3  ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles
   ...
spin16 ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles
spin17 ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles
spin18 ......   Cycles     .....      % relevant to Total Cycles



Threshold.
We know that practically DS & ST can hit all unique/different in a row.
For SU, Straight-Up, we know r]that practically the first repeat treshold is 29th or 30th, test done over 10.000.000 spins -- so there's a window of 7-8 spins till 37 total numbers.




TEST1:   What's the window for SP, splits two-number position, -- if any?
                   Bet any appeared SP, add another on each spin,
                   at repeat restart betting the last outcome as the first bet.
                   Populus: 10.000.000 spins, even better cycles if not too much of a ask

algojack

This is the table for Splits.

                                      NO OF CYCLES     AS %
------------------------------------------------------------
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  2      555753       5.558%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  3     1049581      10.496%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  4     1399462      13.995%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  5     1554231      15.542%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  6     1512373      15.124%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  7     1310145      13.101%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  8     1016764      10.168%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no.  9      712423       7.124%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 10      444302       4.443%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 11      247508       2.475%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 12      120768       1.208%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 13       50952       0.510%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 14       18600       0.186%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 15        5566       0.056%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 16        1310       0.013%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 17         239       0.002%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 18          21       0.000%
First Repeat Occurred @ Spin no. 19           2       0.000%


These figures are a little too high because for simplicity I didn't include the zero. So the first row % should be closer to 2/37=5.41%, whereas they are actually closer to 1/18=5.56%. So as you can see, all splits arrived in the first 18 spins in only 2 of 10M cycles.

I'll code the system next (bet first split and then add each one as they appear).

TRD

@alogojack; great, thanks - that ticks one unknown off the list.
= there no open window on SPs to the first repeat related to the pool of all splits (18/18),
   similar to DS (6/6) & (ST 12/12) all can show in a row; & unlike the SU district where the
   practical window is (29-30/36; 10mil spin test).
   
   Still, the test shows that expanding the bet by an additional SP position on each & every spin, it only makes sense to bet till including perhaps spin 12, but later no more.
  Why - to keep the max cycle drawdown low, & rather recover the outstanding debt with consequent cycles till in nominal profit â†' restart next individual game in the session.

-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18= 9*19= -171
-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-(12)= 6*13= -66 (-78)
Big difference, ≈3x between (171) & (-66) = keeping drawdowns recoverable.

With first 5 spins being positive.

â†'


This relative to the Php Pair completion (version1), betting the pair-repeat or pair-counterpart only on each outcome appearance.

Of course the above ain't totally precise, just the first of the parameters to regard, still narrowing the extremes we play within a bit further.
Why - for when both pairs numbers are out .. the whole pair is bet, so on that particular spin the same number of SP positions as a bet are repeated.



although,
1) since all my system's betting is continuous - it would have been great if you have used the previous' cycle repeat =end of cycle SP as the first position used â†' thus the 'spin1' parameter would also show as relevant
2) include 0, for this is integral part of the game & approximations derived from neglect do not work in our favor, especially when designing a system
3) when opting for actual split positions I would determine that upon the numbers already out in recent spins, current or previous cycle - top & bottom columns outcomes have  (except numbers 36 & 34) three possible positioning options & middle column each 4 options (except number 35); effectively if number 9 is the previous cycle & in current cycle 8 shows SP8-9 would be placed if placing the repeat counterpart, or it pair-counterpart first
4) the SP repeat bell curve shows peaks at spins4,5 (5,6 in the chart), so it may make sense to bet for the repeat-counterpart first & then complete it with
eg. Number 8 shows =splitNⁿ5 = split8-10
      (x+y)=19 â†' splitN°5 + splitN°14  as pair conterparts



Can you first re-run the test two times, each enriched by the next of 1) & 2) points; disregard 3) & 4) for now. No betting amounts, still only distribution percentages to get really precise results.

algojack

Quote from: TRD on Oct 20, 11:40 AM 20212) include 0, for this is integral part of the game & approximations derived from neglect do not work in our favor, especially when designing a system

Ok. Are you also betting on the zero when it appears, or only the splits?

quos

Quote from: TRD on Oct 20, 11:40 AM 2021eg. Number 8 shows =splitNⁿ5 = split8-10
      (x+y)=19 â†' splitN°5 + splitN°14  as pair conterparts

Hi TRD!!
what is split nº5 and split nº 14?

Thanks

TRD

Although you, playing SPs only, can get a bit more creative â†' the splits being arbitrarily labeled differently in each of the cycles ie. as the board fills up, when opting for a specific SP placement option (vertical & horizontal) & the formation derived from that as the board fills up, based on previous cycle outcomes coupling them with the already shown (to repeat, as a refinement that may exclude unnecessarily betting the cold numbers, pushing them towards the cycles' end =full board )

the most simple categorization per the screenshot, construct pair's complementing SP counterparts according to   (x+y)=19, zero excluded



Otherwise, if you are essentially playing the game on SU Pairs, betting both counterparts simultaneously; but rather than playing SUs from the beginning opting for a parachute-style attack that closes many games much quicker in nominal profit  &  moves from 2x DS (spin1, 1st pair), then  4Q (spin2, 2 pairs), 6ST (spin3, 3 pairs), 8SP (spin4, 4 pairs), 10SU (spin 5, 5 pairs)   --   I suggest that you, irregardless of the position type, couple the pairs according to (x+y)=36 for the coupling to be consistent all the way through. After all the goal is to have 2 numbers shown within a threshold of numbers shown producing a complementing pair, thus a hit. Also, the attack varries ad-hoc cycle-by-cycle, since with  fewer positions all the pairs shown can be already covered
eg.

spin1 #16
   16+20=36
   no need for 2DS, one DS covers the pair (-1)

spin 2 #16,19
    16+20=36, 19+17=36
    no need for 4Q; with 2DS both pairs are already covered, resulting in an exposition
    that allows for another DS-based spin pushing the need for Qs a spin onwards ..
    as per the nominal profit requirement (-2, total-3)

spin3 #16,19,25
    .. 22+14=36
    no need for 6ST; 2Q does the job (-2, total -5)

spin4 #16,19,22,25
     25+11=2=36
     no need for 8SP, nor 6ST;
     you wanna break even & continue with 2DS theonwards anew ? --
     bet 3Q (+6) = Q11-14, Q16-20, Q22-25; or Q7-11 instead if 7,8,10 is a recent show ..
     (-3, total -8)

spin5 #16,19,22,25,13
     5ST does the job covering all 5 pairs;
     ST10-12, ST13-17, ST16-18, ST19-21, ST22-24, ST25-27 (-6, total -14)

if spin5 hit (+6, total -2)
    no need to continue with SU,SP,ST, or Q -- 2DS does the job (+3, total +1)
    take the last two outcomes & start the pair-completion anew

spin6 #1
    1+35=36
     DS1-6, DS31-36 (-2, -4)

spin7 #1,13
     1+35=36, 13+23=36
     4Q = Q1-4, Q11-14 (since of 11&13 show), Q22-25, Q32-36
     
spin8 #33 Q32-36 hit (+5,total +1); game done â†' restart

-