• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

I Have An Announcement To Make-I'm Pregnant.

Started by chrisbis, Jan 07, 06:45 AM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chrisbis

Though metaphorically speaking,
We may be expecting a baby

on this one (If the stork bird delivers what 'We're' hoping for!),

and I titled the Topic with the Pregnant phrase,
for the purpose of clarity, TAG words, searches, Guests
and future views of this, and subsequent graphs,
can we call the graph- 3 Dozens Routine please?

Just for the record, no artificial aids were used in the "Mating" process!

I thank U.

mr.ore

Well, it can be so. It is always a problem to name something new, and since I was not being very serious with marginale-like progression, I named it "Pregnant System" ;) Since English is not my natural language, it does not sound so weird. It would sound weird in my natural language, of course. But "Pregnant System" sounds just cool  8)

3 dozens routine sounds too general to me, there might be many. Well, who cares, let's call it 3 dozens routine or whatever.

iggiv

oh man....don't trust the fun mode....
Don't account those results. Fun mode is for luring u. And Martingale works just magics in Fun mode. Real money results are different.


that's all i can say.

Twisteruk

Quote from: iggiv on Jan 07, 07:40 PM 2011
Oh man....don't trust the fun mode....
Don't account those results. Fun mode is for luring u. And Martingale works just magics in Fun mode. Real money results are different.


that's all I can say.

100% Spot on  :thumbsup:

I said as much earlier. And as Chris says he wont know the true outcome until its played for real. If it ever is. Hope so, would be good to see the results of "fun play" and "real play" compared  :)
Its Set In Stone =)

superman

QuoteHope so, would be good to see the results of "fun play" and "real play" compared

Chris is the first person to ever use one of my tools, the tools intention is only to test systems/methods extensivley, so you can relax and watch rather than sit with a pen, paper and calculater ALL the systems I test are not playing roulette period, they are playing random number generators and the roulette table is just a convenient platform for these tests, so when someone states RNG is not roulette I refrain from replying as I know this already.

I've said it many times in the past, RXTreme testing fails at the same rate any RNG roulette platform fails, I started my tests many moons back in RXTreme when I started out and decided to create a bot type tool to get realtime test results as opposed to using rx.

I also test, if it works in fun mode, in real money mode without placing bets, all calcs are done in the normal manner by the tool, just it doesn't place chips, just spins and gets the result. Twister, we should eventually get to real money mode if it looks promising enough.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Twisteruk

Quote from: superman on Jan 08, 06:52 AM 2011

Twister, we should eventually get to real money mode if it looks promising enough.




Cool  :thumbsup:

I look forward to that !

Hope all goes well for you guys  :)
Its Set In Stone =)

superman

QuoteMartingale will NEVER WORK on playtech real mode RNG

Yeah you keep saying, obviousley this thread isn't for you then!!

I/we understand ALL the pitfalls of RNG, Playtech and gambling in general, you don't need to keep remindind us/me, everyones input is welcome could we please keep the doomsday posts to ourselves? not too much to ask is it?
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

GLC

Quote from: superman on Jan 08, 12:02 PM 2011
Yeah you keep saying, obviousley this thread isn't for you then!!

I/we understand ALL the pitfalls of RNG, Playtech and gambling in general, you don't need to keep remindind us/me, everyones input is welcome could we please keep the doomsday posts to ourselves? not too much to ask is it?

Hey Chris.  Remember, you have the big club in this thread.

Any post that you don't think contributes anything new or constructive can be whacked just to keep the topic on track and make staying abreast of what's happening without having to wade through stuff you don't think helps.

Just a reminder.

George
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

chrisbis

Latest test.- Failed.
Bot stopped at Progression Level 23 (6069), since would have gone over table limits.

Playing with 0.10 units.

Start     BR= $5000                Highest  Point  $5443.74
End       BR= $4764.64
Profit/Loss= $-679.10

[attach=#]



iggiv

Quote from: chrisbis on Jan 09, 12:47 PM 2011
Latest test.- Failed.
Bot stopped at Progression Level 23 (6069), since would have gone over table limits.

Playing with 0.10 units.

Start     BR= $5000                Highest  Point  $5443.74
End       BR= $4764.64
Profit/Loss= $-679.10

[attach=#]




now you can see who was right and constructive and who was just  stubborn trying to shut some other people up. and this kind of fails is gonna happen many times more in reality. But not in playtech fun play.  

congratulations, you avoided a great trouble and saved some money by not hurrying to play real.

what happened is just a small and modest example of what really COULD happen. People lost fortunes just like this. In high stake casinos a few times like this -- and a wealthy person can become homeless. And this HAS happen in history.


superman

Quotenow you can see who was right and constructive and who was just  stubborn trying to shut some other people up

There was no malice in my wanting you to refrain from telling us the facts, I know the facts, its impossible to beat roulette, especially rng, I agree with you iggiv, these facts I know and understand, we are running tests on the system posted by James???? where he states $4000 per day from his $1500 bot, were testing it to see how often it actually collapses, I am not being stubborn, if nobody tests it we will never know. In my opinion there is no need for bet selection on RNG no matter where you bet you will win/lose at the expected percentage, how you handle recovery of losses is key, and we are still all looking.

As ChrisB stated we have hit level 24 of the progression twice now, me last night, ChrisB this morning, in the past week it has not gone over 25 levels of the progression, I have seen level 24 3 times in total, Chris saw it once and $hat himself watching the units dissappear, all that profit gone, the usual senario.

So taking that into consideration, if the average daily take is around 10,000 units of 0.10 and lets guess that going to level 30 in the progression may happen 1 time every 2 weeks, its possible that James does make that amount of money but he's keeping quiet about his losses, there MUST be losses.

iggiv, lets call a truce buddy, it's pointless to be pi$$ed off with each other, we are all after the same thing eventually.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

iggiv

When I lost like that I had nobody who would have told me all this. And now when I tried to tell this to people which are exactly in the same position I was -- I get cut off by some intelligent experimenters. That's NOT what pisses me off. Not the fact that you tried to tell me that this thread is not for me. If I was telling anecdotes here and you told me "This thread is not for you" -- who cares. But this was EXACTLY the thread where I had to say exactly what I said.

and people which in the first place had to say what I said (instead of doing and encouraging pointless experiments) -- these people tried to say "this thread is not for you, Chris just remove him from your thread". This is a real shame.

I don't give a darn actually if I am looking an i.d.i.o.t here, I am not here for a beauty contest. But if someone is encouraged by this forum doing obviously DANGEROUS things -- instead of preventing those things, that's what I don't like. Because this forum was just created by Vic to stop those who play Martingale just like this. And it turned out now to be just an opposite instead. With your kind help, guys.


superman

Quoteyou try to experiment and see how soon it can lose

So by that you mean ALL systems on this forum that people are playing, we know they eventually fail but yet everyone is testing them, what's the point of the forum then?

If we were only to discuss winning systems, there wouldn't be much of a forum.

Quotewatch with clever face and say "Yes I know it is not gonna win I was trying to experiment"

Get real fella, this is the same that happens to ALL systems, they get tested to failure and reported as such, what have we done different that upset you?

Of course I may be totally wrong about your intention but I fail to spot the difference to that that happens with ALL systems.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

yrt00

Guys, a couple of questions...

1) why do you test in a table without proper limits 0.01 - 1,000 as he recommends?

2) if it has a 30 step martingale why stop at step 23 or 24?

3)what if you program the bot to wait for 10 miss in each dozen before start playing and just
set the progression for a 20 step?

it will be slower, but i assure safer.. no?

4) he cant make 4k a day in 1 casino, he would get banned, we all know...maybe he has 40 accounts in diff casinos and makes 100 bucks on each one daily

5) maybe less, i mean.. who wants to make 4k a day? who has to make it?

6) maybe he has a internet central (i dont know much about this sorry for my ignorance) and he set 10 pcs/laptops in his house with with 10 diff casino accounts and he puts 10 bots to work at the same time, makes 50 or 100 bucks a day, and easily make1 k per day..

7) or maybe 4k, who cares! the point is to make it consistently and not be noticed..

think for one moment!! maybe he does not make that much, maybe he does.. the thing is, is he profiting every day? consistently?

the less time you spend on that thing the best, and you dont need a coded bot for that, any roulette bot around does the work no?

just trying to help here..

jose

ps: why not make 100 a day on 3 diff casino accounts? 300 a day x 30 = 9k a month not enough??

iggiv

Bud, there are better and worse methods to play. and there are WORST.  There are relatively safe and totally unsafe methods. There are methods which fail in a long run, but they don't harm you too much. For example look at Katilla's recent methods. Have you seen him playing crazy progressions with 4000 units? No, he tries flatbet. Can  you win like that? I don't know. But one thins is for sure, if you lose 200-300 units, you are still safe.

but for God's sake promote a bot for playing 4000 units progression???? If I was mod in this forum  I would not let this topic to go unchecked like that. WE ALL MUST KNOW THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS.
Imagine some people betting 5-10 dollars unit on big stake casino? They do exist.
For God's sake you could not see that this James whoever he is is here to make i.d.i.o.t.s of some people which have no idea what he is doing? Only me and Albahala noted this.
No Mods, no other intelligent people.

I am really surprised here.

-