• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The most productive topic in here that will help us go on with theis game

Started by Master_of_pockets, Jun 10, 09:45 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

vile

mods?????
one is over on Gambler Glen everybody calling c...nts and every second
of his word is F....ck,as its boring for him here,and other mod is busy with
Euro soccer championschip.
How it wouldn't be boring listening to this over and over,
how something works and it doesn't work.
If it did JOHNLEGENDwouldn't be preaching now here
but would be in Macao making money.
Wake up ppl.

Turner

Robeen....well heres a start you can make. Stop taking part in Johnlegends posts. ,he just seems to wind you up.


Turner

Quote from: vile on Jun 10, 01:23 PM 2012
mods?????
one is over on Gambler Glen everybody calling c...nts and every second
of his word is F....ck,as its boring for him here,and other mod is busy with
Euro soccer championschip.
How it wouldn't be boring listening to this over and over,
how something works and it doesn't work.
If it did JOHNLEGENDwouldn't be preaching now here
but would be in Macao making money.
Wake up people.


Come on Vile...Im sure Thomas Grant will be here within the hour to battle this one out for us...lol

vile


Turner


Robeenhuut

Quote from: turnerfeck on Jun 10, 01:36 PM 2012
Robeen....well heres a start you can make. Stop taking part in Johnlegends posts. ,he just seems to wind you up.

Thanks 4 yr advice Turner.  I guess he does not wind u up?   ;D   What i know is that d likes of math boys like he branded his opponents stopped paying any attention 2 him n it was probably a wise decision.
Gradually all his system will end up in dust bin where they belong. We just tested recently his Reverse Code 4 Attack n everybody just gave up on it rather quickly. JL sort of admitted that he was wrong but pointed out that he had something better 2 hit this forum. In d meantime his Trilogy underwent lots of tweaks but i guess d strike rate is just not there.
These r bare facts n there is no sugarcoating them.  I dont have any personal vendetta against him but it just pisses me off when somebody insults my intelligence n claims 2 poses an ultimate knowledge of d game.

Regards
Matt

vile


These r bare facts n there is no sugarcoating them.  I don't have any personal vendetta against him but it just pisses me off when somebody insults my intelligence n claims 2 poses an ultimate knowledge of d game.

Regards
[/quote]

Same here.Vain is his problem.

Turner

Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jun 10, 02:08 PM 2012
Thanks 4 yr advice Turner.  I guess he does not wind u up?   ;D   What i know is that d likes of math boys like he branded his opponents stopped paying any attention 2 him n it was probably a wise decision.
Gradually all his system will end up in dust bin where they belong. We just tested recently his Reverse Code 4 Attack n everybody just gave up on it rather quickly. JL sort of admitted that he was wrong but pointed out that he had something better 2 hit this forum. In d meantime his Trilogy underwent lots of tweaks but i guess d strike rate is just not there.
These r bare facts n there is no sugarcoating them.  I don't have any personal vendetta against him but it just pisses me off when somebody insults my intelligence n claims 2 poses an ultimate knowledge of d game.

Regards

Robeen....Ive worked out you are a clever guy for my self, not because you keep telling me you are like some in here :thumbsup:

I just think that while you are arguing with JL, you could be putting together something from your camp. If I placed an idea here (I just have in notepad) I would welcome criticism, so I would enjoy the post and so would you. You dont seem to be enjoying commenting on JL's posts because its not getting you anywhere. I personally wouldnt bother. If it turns out to be the holy grail, then you didnt embarrass yourself saying how rubbish it was because you didnt comment.
If it crashes and burns....have a chuckle to yourself.
I just think its distracting you being creative. This site is dying. it needs people like you and GLC and TwoCAtSam to get stuff up here. Look at all the stuff Proof puts up in notepad. I dont think he sleeps...lol

I dont like Matix bets. I have better things to do than sit in a casino for 7 hours to make less than if I worked in McDonalds, but JL and his apostles love them. Good luck to them. Lets move on.

TwoCatSam

Oh, Geez......I can join!!

Hey, remember the statement by John that he could beat RNG play money all night and day?  Yep, he said that.

EDIT:  The rest of my post was harsh.  Best kill it..........

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

atlantis

turnerfeck wrote:
Quote
Look at all the stuff Proof puts up in notepad

Yes Proofreader has given us some good food for thought, I agree...
In fact, I'd forgotten that he gave me a tweak/mod for one of my posted systems that I haven't tried out yet!  Tx for the reminder :)
A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

superman

QuoteHey, remember the statement by John that he could beat RNG play money all night and day?  Yep, he said that

Yup seem to remember that, sad really, I would actually pay to see that performance.
There's only one way forward, follow random, don't fight with it!

Ignore a thread/topic that mentions 'stop loss', 'virtual loss' and also when a list is provided of a progression, mechanical does NOT work!

Drazen


Anyway making money on roulette is reduced to get everything average, on the mean, inside the curve.
And that is what Marigny said.


So Marigny is best you can have. Actualy he can beat the edge on la partage, with right MM.


But when you put Marigny in reality in B&M... I realy don't know how many of us here could be so patient and disciplined. It requires real spartan discipline and incredible patience. For one man, hm. very very hard. So in the past there were so called Marigny teams, who were playing this, all day tracking tables and opportunities in casinos.


One of members here played it some time ago, he waited almost 3 days to get a trigerr for +1 unit. In average you can expect 1-2 trigger every 300 spins... But you can track many things with it, so it depends on you in the end or your team. Of course you play with reasonable chip size and bank, to reward such skills.


Regards


Drazen




Skakus

Quote from: vile on Jun 10, 01:23 PM 2012
mods? ??? ?
one is over on Gambler Glen everybody calling c...nts and every second
of his word is F....ck
Ha!
I thought I was the only one who noticed that.

This mod even showed up on the old VLS the other day and told some arguing posters over there to, << cool it with the language >>  :twisted:

This mod also used to go on about being consistant across the different forum boards.  :twisted:
A ship moored in the harbour is safe, but that's not what ships are made for.

Still

Quote from: turnerfeck on Jun 10, 02:28 PM 2012
I don't like Matix bets. I have better things to do than sit in a casino for 7 hours to make less than if I worked in McDonalds, but JL and his apostles love them. Good luck to them. Lets move on.

Feel free to move on and/or offer us other ideas.  Meanwhile,  you're statement here is misleading.  How much you make per hour is dependent on the size of your basic unit of risk (assuming the system is a long-term winner). Matrix bets don't dictate what is your bankroll, which is what determines the basic unit best for the system you are playing.  Yes, some systems require a larger bankroll.  Are you saying matrix systems require especially large bankrolls?  Research is suggesting otherwise. 

Liking a certain kind of bet should come down to whether you've got a way to win long-term, for as many spins as you like, for as many sessions as you like, for as many weeks, months, or years as you like.  After that, what does it matter if you wait one hour to make one bet?  If that's what it takes to make the bet more sure than any other kind of bet you can think of, then all you have to do is bring the bankroll that lets you earn as much as the owner of a McDonald's franchise.  If you don't have that kind of bank, why dislike a system that is sure to pay you well otherwise?  If it's not sure to pay you, then say so.  That's a good reason for not liking it.  But until you have proved that the hit-rate can't stay ahead of the losses when they come, then you can't say it's not sure to pay you.  If it is sure to pay you, then it's only a matter of efficiency. 

Units-per-hour is a measure of efficient use of time.  If you're complaint about matrix systems came down to this, i would be interested in what you have to say.   Please name the system or systems that have a more efficient use of time at the same time you are telling us you dislike other systems (ie. matrix systems).  Otherwise, how are you helping?  And how is it helping us for you to paint all matrix systems with the same color?

If croco's posts are authentic, you've misled us regarding the efficiency of matrix systems.  See:

link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7754.msg70471#msg70471








 

Still

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Jun 10, 03:26 PM 2012
Hey, remember the statement by John that he could beat RNG play money all night and day?  Yep, he said that.

Quote from: superman on Jun 10, 04:06 PM 2012
Yup seem to remember that, sad really, I would actually pay to see that performance.

You guys, this is quibbling. 

The statement was based on the belief that RNG in play mode is a fair - random - game.   It was based on the belief that RNG in real money mode is more often than not rigged.  That belief may or may not include BetVoyager as the policies of one casino owner may differ from the policies of another.

Legend believes he can beat a fair game where the wheel is truly random.  He hasn't made any additional claims regarding RNG in play mode that he already hasn't made about a live wheel. 

He has not made a video of an RNG test in play mode.  So what?  To my knowledge, he hasn't made any videos of anything. He appears to be too busy actually making money on live wheels to be in a hurry to prove anything about RNGs.  That would be just another series of tests in addition to the one's he's already running.  He might have the time, he might not.  How important is it to him to prove something about that to anyone?  And what would a video prove? 

If someone has done tests on RNG play-mode, and, exactly following Legend's instructions, showed evidence that it won't work, then say so.  Otherwise, if you haven't, also say so.  Say, 'I have not tested anything of Legend's on RNG play-mode, but i am willing to make authoritative comments on what are the possibilities anyway'.   




-