I always had this idea if you can beat the outside bet you can beat the inside since all bets are the same .
You can't change the odds but roulette does not always match the probability .
So if we can come up with a bet selection that does not lose 6in row that often I think you would have a winner .
If probability says that you would lose 6 In row 1 time in 74 spins means in 1500 you should lose 20 times and if you lose 3 per 1500 that's a winner.
13
16-L
15
8
1
13
3 -L
26
22
9
4
25
26
8
2
16
19
31
1 -L
23
8 -L
17
15
2
17
29
6
21
12 -W
4
35
4
15
5
10
22
27
32
2 -L
15
0
28
36
9
36
35
22
31
15 -W
16
17
19
13
8 -W
31
29 -W
27
5
22
34
3
21
20 -L
19
6
33
6
34
29
31
10 -W
7
17
4
16
6
16
5
20
1
7
28
22
36
25
16
25
34
15
26
15
10
32
32 -W
6 -L
6
26
24
25
18
2
9
Variance plays a huge role,so my thinking is have a bet that can tame this a bit not all but enough to get our wins .
You have stratagies like pattern breaker the only thing with this kind of betting is the waiting, you can play with patterns But it has to be done on a rolling basis .
It's interesting that we can send people to the moon but we can not come up with A great pattern Stratagie . I have come close but there is always some way Random finds the way to close the loop hole ,Its quite fascinating .
If bets lose 6!in row to often then it's not worth further testing this is what I focus all my 50/50 bets on . 3 in row this is really hard in all the years never can I come up with a bet that can beat this probability .
Here is how a I like to see patterns there are 8 pattern of 3 if you don't know look them up
Ex.
534358714361117373552216832654288777462864
Here is the Lw
wll:wwl:ww wl:ww w :::l :ww wl:
So as you can see double LLs are rare .
Finding a way to play around with patterns can be fun .and no waiting long dragged out spins .
There are times when 38/1 is achievable that's when more money should be bet ,cause they don't come very often so awareness when it comes should be heighten .
The money train is there you just have to get on And hope they have pretty woman .around when your winning lol.
Winner
You fed us with lots of talk, it's time for actions and not talk, go ahead and show us some actions !
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Apr 24, 09:28 AM 2018
Winner
You fed us with lots of talk, it's time for actions and not talk, go ahead and show us some actions !
[/quote
O you like what you see ha.
Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 08:43 AM 2018
Here is how a I like to see patterns there are 8 pattern of 3 if you don't know look them up
Ex.
534358714361117373552216832654288777462864
Here is the Lw
wll:wwl:ww wl:ww w :::l :ww wl:
So as you can see double LLs are rare .
Finding a way to play around with patterns can be fun .and no waiting long dragged out spins .
It's right here RB
Winner
can you record a session how you play and post it here?
Thx
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Apr 24, 09:49 AM 2018
Winner
can you record a session how you play and post it here?
Thx
[/quote
Np
Winner
I don't want to let you down, but I can't imagine how much ignorance people have !
Many people think they lose in roulette because of the green zero
Believe me, most people would still lose in roulette even with a table without the green zero.
The zeros don't make people lose its the odds and the payout but that we can't change that but probability is not what it seems so this is where we can win .
Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 08:43 AM 2018
Ex.
534358714361117373552216832654288777462864
Here is the Lw
wll:wwl:ww wl:ww w :::l :ww wl:
Hi Winner,
whats the logic behind w and l ?
5 -> 3 w
3 -> 4 l
4 -> 3 l etc ?
There's only two ways you can bet , for a run or a switch of patterns that's it . After the first bet loss your always in recovery that's easy to understand you need a progression no way around that And not explosive .
Here
LLL. 1
LLH. 2
LHL. 3
LLH 4
HHH 5
HHL 6
HLH 7
HLL 8
Here ex.
3 8 6 2 5
- wwLw
Quote from: Herby on Apr 24, 10:41 AM 2018
Hi Winner,
whats the logic behind w and l ?
5 -> 3 w
3 -> 4 l
4 -> 3 l etc ?
Just betting random I can't use logic to play it's not logical it's about proving probability wrong.
For ex. Roulette gives this outcome
LLL 1 now my bet won't be HHL 6 see how many times you can make this win .
TNX Winner,
I should have asked for relations instead of logic.
You gave a good answer.
Winner
When do you want to show us actions instead of words ?
Is there a reason to bet against fig6 after f1?
The total antifigure after f1 could be f5 ? (corrected ...)
Or in other thinking f7 ...
Quote from: Herby on Apr 24, 11:14 AM 2018
I there a reason to bet against fig6 after f1?
The total antifigure after f1 could be f5 ? (corrected ...)
Or in other thinking f7 ...
[/quote
Ex if you run all 8 patterns for 24 spins I have yet to see all 8 show therefore combos are possible the combos are something that can be played around with to prove probability wrong. The reason again there is none just like there is no reason why roulette throws out repeaters more then odds say its just something that happens .
Like I said 6 in a row losses is what I base my bets on through combos if probability says I should lose 6 in row evert 74 spins and in 1500 hundred spins that means I should lose close to 14 times and if 3 or 4 I'm well below probability .
The 6 and 1 is an ex.try it you might like the results .then move on to the next.
Quote from: Roulettebeater on Apr 24, 11:13 AM 2018
Winner
When do you want to show us actions instead of words ?
Well you could for starters take out your super computer and test the 6 and 1and see how many times you get a double loss I don't need to test I ve done enough to over the years that I have no time to bullshit. Other combos will come but you sound desperate I thought you had a killer system lol
Here something to think about you have a 6 and 1 combo is a loss a 616 combo is a double loss see how many times Random can make this lose .
Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 04:02 PM 2018
Here something to think about you have a 6 and 1 combo is a loss a 616 combo is a double loss see how many times Random can make this lose .
Can you explaining it More?
Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 24, 04:31 PM 2018
Can you explaining it More?
I did not not think you were into 50/50 bets
There was this dude in the MonteCarlo anecdotes:he'd bet alternatively for switch-same-switch-same. He would not often lose 4 times in a row. Only a doublet pattern on the wrong side would make him lose. Guess u could try for a run of 6. Still,i think whatever the betting decision, there is perfect balance between potential wins vs potential losses.
What' a win in your example? A w in a progression of 3?
I like staying with the same color until 2 losses in a row. Again, doublets kill it (rrbbrrbb). Or 3 in row.
But the thing with 2 losses, it assures you at least a 50%win until changing side (not so bad with tiers et tout).
You really go random with the 3-spin pattern you decide to bet for?
Quote from: Bigbroben on Apr 24, 08:31 PM 2018
There was this dude in the MonteCarlo anecdotes:he'd bet alternatively for switch-same-switch-same. He would not often lose 4 times in a row. Only a doublet pattern on the wrong side would make him lose. Guess u could try for a run of 6. Still,i think whatever the betting decision, there is perfect balance between potential wins vs potential losses.
What' a win in your example? A w in a progression of 3?
I like staying with the same color until 2 losses in a row. Again, doublets kill it (rrbbrrbb). Or 3 in row.
But the thing with 2 losses, it assures you at least a 50%win until changing side (not so bad with tiers et tout).
You really go random with the 3-spin pattern you decide to bet for?
Yes there is always the killer pattern. Random finds a way to close the loop .
I'm trying to beat probability .
The idea hear is this ,can this win yes can this lose yes everything works til it doesn't .
We all know this . Rare events happen but how you deal with it is the key do you chase or go with the flow . I will present a bit more info as soon as I can.
Quote from: Winner on Apr 24, 10:30 AM 2018
The zeros don't make people lose its the odds and the payout but that we can't change that but probability is not what it seems so this is where we can win .
Greed and impatience make people lose! :sad2:
Quote from: blueman on Apr 25, 04:22 AM 2018
Greed and impatience make people lose! :sad2:
As well as betting on Losses.