my half cent.
Ok, we already understand random and
unpredictable randomness, and limit of random.
Now, say ,
What must HAPPEN in next 100spins, guaranteed!?..
In next 100spins....The EC ,dz,dd,ds
streak of same ,(or chop of EC,dz)...
The EC, in next100spins
STREAK OF..
ONE...must happen.!
TWO...must happen.!
THREE ..must happen!
FOUR...must happen!
FIVE....must happen???
SIX...??
SEVEN...??
EIGHT..??
NINE...??
TEN....??
ELEVEN and more...??
I read a research about this occurrences, somewhere in internet years ago... (unfortunately i cant find it, maybe someone could post a link...or members could do research )
and how we could take advantage to hilt, say, eg. a streak of three that MUST HAPPEN???
Someone needs to research million spins to see what the least streak of EC, in 100spins increment.
Thus hypothesiscally IF the worst ever streak of EC was, say FIVE in row, then we could devise a strategy to mm for five-in-row, in every 100spins, fearlessly.
First by waiting for certain spins that has no 5in row, then bet the remaining spins for 5 to happen.
Random has the same limit as numbers.
You cant look at a sample of spins and say an event doesn't seem to happen in x amount of spins. It's all in proportion.
All been said before. Listen, or don't.
Steve,
you dont have believe streak of 2,3,4, or five cant hit in next 100spins?
Sure it can. You need to understand why it's irrelevant.
Knowing that something must happen is unfortunately not enough to win. You cannot tell when the event will happen, and you cannot blindly try to predict when it will happen, because the loss that comes from all the failed predictions will wipe out all your winnings or gets you into a hole.
Maybe not the best example, but think about this. Pick a football team, now you can definitely tell that the team will either win or lose two matches in a row in the next say 30 games. Is knowing that it will happen enough for you to profit from it? This is where sport bettors turn to statistics to increase the accuracy of their predictions.
Sure, you could pick the best team in the league, they will very likely win two games in a row, but the return is too small. It's like covering 35 numbers is roulette.
There has been many discussions about statistical imbalances in roulette and how they could help to increase the accuracy of predictions of when certain events that must happen will happen. But it's not very likely that you will find the solution. If there is one.
Ati,
We dont try to predict what and when streak of x-in-row , will happen.
But it definitely MUST HAPPEN!
Say, eg. streak of TWO...must happen,
streak of THREE ....must happen..
Or ,
dare you say that streak of FOUR may not happen in next 100spins?!
Thats why we need someone to do research, what the worst shortest ever STREAK in 100spins.
If, say, the shortest ever is 4 in 100spins, then we could fearlessly devise a parlay mm to beat it, never to fear the worst from hell negative variance.
personally, I think,
worst ever maximum streak of EC, is streak of three, meaning that there must at least a three-in-row in next 100spins.
Thus in EC bet, eg. if we bet only player, expect to see at least a three-hit-in-row in 100bet.
What if the 3in-row hit at the very last 97th hand??? you bet P and lose from 1st to 96th... because 3P in row never materialize then PPP from 97th to 100th???
of course everyone knows the simple parlay mm of EC in three hits =1,2,4=7u.
thus if the streak of three hit at the 97th, then how we devise a incrementally mm that recoup all the 1st to 96th losses???
meaning the 100th hit win of 7units, recoup all the first 96 bets losses???
Quote from: ati on Nov 11, 07:28 AM 2019Knowing that something must happen is unfortunately not enough to win. You cannot tell when the event will happen, and you cannot blindly try to predict when it will happen, because the loss that comes from all the failed predictions will wipe out all your winnings or gets you into a hole.
So true. The only thing that you can know is that something is happening while it happens. That in no way tells you what will happen on the next spin. Perhaps you should find out why people are winning using my method, RR.
another parlay known to all is say, prepare 3u for next 3spins, thus
bet 1u, parlay winning plus 1.
bet 3u, parlay plus 1.
bet7u...=14minus 3=11u.
thus how 11u won, recoup previous first 96bets???
I don't think it can help you to create a winning system. But I have tested 10,000 times 100 spins for EC streaks, what statistics do you want to know?
Quote from: gizmotron2 on Nov 11, 09:12 AM 2019
So true. The only thing that you can know is that something is happening while it happens. That in no way tells you what will happen on the next spin.
Hi Gizmotron,
we cannot, and we do not predict, but we know for sure, that something MUST HAPPEN.
Please relook at our files, any EC bet of red black, player banker or even FTL.
You will noticed that, in every 100bet increment, there will be at least 3hit-in-row in 100bets.
Could anyone here show a bm casino's file that has only 2hit-in -row in 100bet???
Then again, everyone here knows, that
a chop also a strrak
eg.
pbp= three hit in row, if we be chops...
anyone dare say that bpb, or rbr, or hlh, or oeo ....that three in row, may not hit in next 100bet.
It has nothing to do with ecart, variance, voodoo, or PREDICTION.
It simply....must happen...!!!
Quote from: ati on Nov 11, 09:30 AM 2019
I don't think it can help you to create a winning system. But I have tested 10,000 times 100 spins for EC streaks, what statistics do you want to know?
please see what the shortest maximum streak in 100.
(my english no good😂...)
simply mean...see if the longest streak of EC in a particular 100bet...is only 3in-row..(there is no streak of more than 3hit...the longest is only 3 hit, for example)
.and what the worst maximum dozen streaks in 100 too.
thanks in advance.
I hope I understand you correctly. So out of 10,000 tests 370 times the maximum streak was 3 in a row.
Please see below on average how many times an EC repeated in a row, within 100 spins. This shows that there is a good chance that a streak of 6 will happen at least once in every 100 spins. But not always!! 2240 times the maximum was 5, so it's unpredictable.
Streak of 3 11.8199
Streak of 4 5.7471
Streak of 5 2.7941
Streak of 6 1.3598
Streak of 7 0.6598
Streak of 8 0.315
Streak of 9 0.1495
Streak of 10 0.0738
Streak of 11 0.033
Streak of 12 0.0166
Streak of 13 0.0076
Streak of 14 0.0031
Streak of 15 0.0011
Streak of 16 0.0004
Streak of 17 0.0003
Streak of 18 0.0002
Streak of 19 0.0002
Streak of 20 0.0001
Streak of 21 0.0001
Sorry I don't have time for dozens now, I'm still at work.
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 11, 09:31 AM 2019
Hi Gizmotron,
we cannot, and we do not predict, but we know for sure, that something MUST HAPPEN.
What are you trying to accomplish here? Anything that continues three in a row is nothing. It's so common that it's unremarkable. What you want is a swarm of three in a rows of the same characteristic. I told about this 14 years ago. I called it the "Global Effect." I've shown examples of it over the years. It's time you catch up.
A perfect example would be triples on the strong side. You are bringing a peashooter to a gun fight. Looking only for different types of triples is weak at best. Singles on the weak side are very common also. Perfect symmetrical patterns that continue to occur all across the chart are also wonderful.
Please explain how you intend to exploit triples? That is the real trick you know.
Thanks Gizmotron,
Thanks Ati for your table, appreciate them!
you mean 370out of 10000, 370 have only maximum hit of 3in row?!And averages 11.8 bunch of 3in row.
so what the worst lowest count of bunch, in the ONLY had max streak of 3in row?
(eg. in that particular 100... the longest streak is only 3hit in row, and there only ONE streak, the others are streaks of 2 and 1)
Do you mean that in every 100 there are at least few streaks of 3hit up to more than ten count of streaks of 3hit, averaging 11.8?
Gizmotron,
I am keen to understand your way, thus I try to think, if we target only streak of 3 hit, then with parlay plus 1, =1,3,7=14-3=11u, maybe we could built a mm to win.
But then again, if we targeting 4hit streak, then 1,3,7,15=30-4=26, will be less risky.
Hypothesiscally
if 4hits streak, must hit at least once in next 100 , then waiting for tens spins, of no occurrences, then proceed, risked less.
Ati,
please, do me a favor,
(.my english not very good, thus need to rephrase my questions)
In your 10000, ALL HAS AT LEAST a streak of 3hit.???
thus streak of 3hit must happen???
then in the 370, what the worst count of (streak of 3hit)...in 100spins
(for example, in my 370 record, in a particular 100spins, there only two count of "streak-3in-row")
thanks in advance!
need to hit the bed...good night!
Just take your 100 spins and divide it by the partitions you are interested in for example
1 of the dozens is guaranteed 34 hits
100 divided by 6 Lines guarantees 1 Line will have minimum 17 hits etc
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 11, 10:52 AM 2019you mean 370out of 10000, 370 have only maximum hit of 3in row?!And averages 11.8 bunch of 3in row.
No, sorry, I've made a mistake somewhere. 370 is for 4 max in a row.
Out of 10000, max 3 in a row in 100 spins only happened 4 times.
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 11, 10:52 AM 2019so what the worst lowest count of bunch, in the ONLY had max streak of 3in row?
9, the rest is one or two of the same EC in a row. But as I wrote above, it only happened 4 times in 1 million spins.
Sorry for the confusion, but I had 2.3 million excel cells filled with numbers, there are a large number a different statistics that comes out of this data.
I still think that it won't help you. Millions of people have already tried to exploit rare events, unsuccessfully.
And unfortunately average statistics won't help either in most cases. Otherwise I'd already have the HG. :P I created a system where I have to bet between 7 and 11 numbers. The average in 100K spins is exactly 9. If I run the simulation with a fixed 9 units loss or 27 units win, I get a linear winning chart. A true HG. But with the exact win/loss calculated, it doesn't win anymore.
Thanks Mickavelli for your thought, please tell more about your strategy.
Ati,
thanks for your explaination, appreciate them!
if we bet flat 1u and parlay plus one for next 100 bet , thus 1,3,7=14units won.
then IF in next 100bet, the streak of 3hit, hit....
NONE=LOSE -100U.
ONCE=14-100=-86LOSSES.
TWICE=28-100
THRICE=42-100
"
"
SEVEN=98-100=-2losses
EIGHT=112-100=+12U PROFIT.
WE need to know what the count, number, of worst ever hit of "streak-3in-row"... in 100spins
we still not know what the worst may hit, in this ,"streak of 3hit".
eg. IF say, after billions bet record researched, and the worst, is,
say,
worst ever= only-seven "streak3hit",
then we could devise a mm to win fearlessly.
personally, and with Ati's files record, I think maximum "streak 3hit" is the worst ever in 100bet.
Anyone has "only streak of 2hit in row", in their record? I dont think so.
another pertinent is what the lowest amount of "STREAK of3hit",. in the "only max streak3hit./100"
two way to devise mm for this streak3hit.
firstly,
we regard the streak3hit only hit ONCE...in 100bet..and it must happen, either from the very first or the very last 97th bet.
thus a progression snowballing
secondly,
by knowing what the worst ever hit, the lowest count of streak3hit in 100.
if. for example, worst ever is five, then a little progression may win.
The "streak of 4hit in row", parlaying return is much higher proportionally.
bet 1u flat parlay+1,
for 100bet
=risked losing=100unit.
1,3,7,15=30units... prospect.
thus, if hit ..
NONE=LOSE -100U.
ONCE=30-100=-70U
TWICE=60-100
THRICE=90-100
FOUR=120-100
As in Ati's files, streak of 4hit, may not happen in next 100spins,(400spins/1million ) thus we lose
whole br.
And we may encounter 'only ONE streak of 4hit" at the very end of 100bet.
thus need to devise mm to recoup losses if "only one streak of 4hit at the very end"
WHAT MUST HIT
in next 100hands /spins???
No prediction, guessing, or voodoo!?😄
CHOPS of 1,2 and 3 must happen.
Anyone dares say chops of 3 may not hit in next 100?
bpb must hit, thus take advantage.
same to double chops...
bbppbb
FOLLOW THE LAST.
In streaky baccarat, follow the last may see many streak of 3,4,5 +
but then again, someone in the betselection. fourum insist that ftl may hit ONLY 30hit/100, but I see that it even has many streak of 3 and few streak4hit.
we could also play as team of three.
1person play ftl , one bet chop, one play f2ndlast. where a killing recoup others losses.
in baccarat,
(first, forget about s6 and commision ).
what will hit in next 3hand.
List has 8 entries.
b,b,b
b,b,p
b,p,b
b,p,p
p,b,b
p,b,p
p,p,b
p,p,p..
if eight people as team parlay with 1u +1.
then 8x100=800u risked.
all permutations will hit at least once in next 100hand.
stop at first profit.
will this team make money?
how to tweak and progression?
37 repeaters must hit for sure.
Must hit red or black.
Streaks of dozen also must hit.
Anyone dares say "streak of 3" of a single dozen wont happen in next 100spins?
By betting,
parlay+1 of single dz for 3in row.
bet1=2+1+1=4
bet4=8+4+1=13
bet13=26+13=39-3=36units.
now the question is,
any record that
"dozen, streak of 3",
not happen in 100spins?
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 11, 11:12 PM 2019
As in Ati's files, streak of 4hit, may not happen in next 100spins,(400spins/1million ) thus we lose
whole br.
And we may encounter 'only ONE streak of 4hit" at the very end of 100bet.
thus need to devise mm to recoup losses if "only one streak of 4hit at the very end"
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 11, 09:05 PM 2019WE need to know what the count, number, of worst ever hit of "streak-3in-row"... in 100spins
Hey sweet, what's stopping you from being dealt the worst ever streak when you sit down?
Sorry not trying to sound negative but you started this with a non random question and took things to a guessing of when will something happen that is not guaranteed to happen game.
Plus, how come you are so interested in such long playing sessions?
You can calculate the minimum number of hits per partition etc for much shorter sessions and explore other guaranteed structures that make up those worst case scenarios to help in devising a plan
if dozen streak3hit, did not hit in many 100spins, then we could bet
"dozen streak2hit".
we could see that many
"dz streak2hit",
in 100spins.
simple parlay+1
bet1=2+1+1=4
bet4=8+4=12-2=10units.
thus, bet 1u for next 100spins.
if streak2hit happen...
none=lose-100units.
once=+12-100=-88u losses.
twice=+24-100=-76 losses.
thrice=+36-100=-64 losses.
*
nine=108-100=+8.
thus flat bet parlay needs NINE streak2hit to profit.
the pertinent question is, in dz record, of 100spins increment,
what the least ever count of streak2 hit?
if we could have faith what worst may happen, we could devise a progression mm.
Hope you could help research your files.
Thanks.
Quote from: mickavelli on Nov 12, 09:38 AM 2019
Hey sweet, what's stopping you from being dealt the worst ever streak when you sit down?
Sorry not trying to sound negative but you started this with a non random question and took things to a guessing of when will something happen that is not guaranteed to happen game.
Plus, how come you are so interested in such long playing sessions?
You can calculate the minimum number of hits per partition etc for much shorter sessions and explore other guaranteed structures that make up those worst case scenarios to help in devising a plan
Hey Mickavelli,
I am keen to learn your "partition" , please tell more.
We not try to guess, but rather, try to understand what the worst ever hit, or as known to others as VIRTUAL LIMIT.
it simply mean something MAY NOT HAPPEN BEYOND A TRESHOLD,
say,bm, record worst ever EC is 69hit in 200spins, and rng is only 30 hit in 100 bet.
thus you NEVER see any EC less than 69hit/200 or 30hit/100bet yet till today.
search the net, and read them.
we not guessing nor predicting.
we know some length MUST hit, because there a RECORD,, and so obvious....and non random too.
we just need to research what the WORST EVER in the past 300years of casino.
say, EC,
streaks of 3, MUST HIT in next 100spins.
what unknown is what the least ever amount of streak of 3hit in 100.
Streak of 4, may absent in next 100bet, as Ati's files... where four 100 increment in million spins. there simply no "streak of 4hit"
same as dz streaks of2hit,
I dont think there ever a 100 without streak2hit.
it must hit, must happen, just need to know what the least ever recorded so we could build mm around it.
Dozen, streak of 3hit, may absent in next 100. we just need to research for sure
in EC, 69hit or more Must happen in next 200spins.
30hit or more must hit in next 100spins.
that called VIRTUAL LIMIT...and non random, and must happen
(except in rng when you could corrupt program cheating)
members of other forum claim they could bet to win the,
only 69hit/200spins, and only 30hit/100spins with their own labby progression.
I believe they could,
labby could win, since labby needs only 33%+1 hit to win 1 unit.
But the progression run up to hundreds units per bet...5000u br, which is just impossible for us to bet in casino
There are no limits. Everything is in proportion to amount of spins.
You're looking at completely the wrong thing. Do you want to understand it?
Quote from: Steve on Nov 12, 04:00 PM 2019
There are no limits. Everything is in proportion to amount of spins.
You're looking at completely the wrong thing. Do you want to understand it?
Steve,
you're right that PROPORTION to amount of spins.
that proportion will be large and small, namely variance.
The proportion cant become to large or too small...
look back at any history spins record, there never less than 69hit/200bet in any EC bet.
that the lowest proportion,and largest never exceed 131hit/200bet.
that a written record, yet broken, we cant dispute that.
thus if we want to win EC bet, we need to devise mm that can survive the 69/200, or else.
If you're thinking variance is the enemy you must overcome, you're heading the wrong direction.
Quote from: gizmotron2 on Nov 11, 10:14 AM 2019
Anything that continues three in a row is nothing. It's so common that it's unremarkable.
Please explain how you intend to exploit triples? That is the real trick you know.
Gizmotron,
Triple is so common, but it is remarkable,
(as I sound like a broken record player) we need to know, what the least possible for triple to hit in 100 spins, Historically...
look at past history bm record, when we know the worst ever, then we can devise mm around the worst ever, and bet fearlessly.
for example, hypothesiscally,say
worst is only EIGHT TRIPLE,
then flatbet parlay+1, can win.
below a data of dozens.
let see how the streak of dozen 1, happen
Zumma American roulette , dozen one only hit 19/100 .
3
3
2
2
2
3
3
0
2
3
2
1
3
3
1
3
3
3
1
3
3
1
1
3
2
3
3
3
1
3
3
2
3
1
3
2
2
2
3
2
3
1
3
2
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
2
3
2
2
2
3
1
2
3
1
1
0
3
1
2
0
2
1
2
3
2
0
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
3
2
2
2
2
0
3
3
2
2
0
3
1
0
3
3
2
1
1
3
1
1
1
0
2
3
1
2
1
1
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
3
2
1
2
2
3
1
1
1
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
2
2
2
0
1
2
1
2
3
2
3
1
0
2
3
2
3
1
2
0
2
2
1
3
2
2
3
3
2
1
2
1
3
2
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
3
2
1
3
2
0
2
0
3
1
1
3
2
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
3
2
3
3
1
3
3
3
2
3
3
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
1
3
2
1
2
2
3
2
3
3
1
0
2
1
1
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
3
2
1
2
1
0
3
1
2
1
3
3
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
2
1
1
3
1
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
2
2
1
1
2
2
3
3
1
3
3
1
2
2
1
1
1
3
0
3
1
1
3
2
2
2
2
1
3
3
2
2
1
3
1
3
3
3
3
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
1
2
1
3
3
1
0
1
1
2
3
1
2
3
3
3
3
0
3
2
3
1
1
1
1
3
0
2
2
3
2
2
2
3
0
1
1
2
1
1
3
2
2
3
2
1
3
3
2
2
1
2
0
2
0
3
1
3
1
3
2
1
3
2
3
3
0
3
2
1
1
3
1
2
3
1
3
1
3
3
2
3
3
1
1
1
We can see that, though dz1 only hit 19 time, it still streaking up to 2,3 and even four.
ok, someone already roll up his eyes, as this just small data!😁.
But the point is, no need to predict or guessing, STREAK3HIT of dz MUST HAPPEN!
we just dont know, the worst least count amount of streak3hit.
Thus need help from avid members to research!
we see lots of streak2 too, and when a single dz sleepy, the other TWO DOZEN, streaking like crazy!!!
look forward to hear from you guys!
Hi everyone,
I was wondering if you guys know if it is possible to use artificial intelligence to predict the next number in roulette?
I googled it and I found this article, this guy uses some online AI to play live roulette here is the link to the article:
*** link removed (is dead anyway)
I was looking for an A.I algorithm for a long time, I guess I need to learn how to code.
Sweet, dont you think that has been tried a million times before?
Quote from: Kali49 on Nov 13, 12:02 AM 2019I was wondering if you guys know if it is possible to use artificial intelligence to predict the next number in roulette?
Yes, it's similar to what I did. If done correctly you can find and exploit statistical anomalies of real wheels. The real trick is doing it in a practical amount of spins.
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 12, 09:57 PM 2019
Gizmotron,
Triple is so common, but it is remarkable,
(as I sound like a broken record player) we need to know, what the least possible for triple to hit in 100 spins, Historically...
look at past history bm record, when we know the worst ever, then we can devise mm around the worst ever, and bet fearlessly.
for example, hypothesiscally,say
worst is only EIGHT TRIPLE,
then flatbet parlay+1, can win.
Is that possible?
Quote from: Steve on Nov 13, 12:15 AM 2019
Sweet, dont you think that has been tried a million times before?
Yes, it's similar to what I did. If done correctly you can find and exploit statistical anomalies of real wheels. The real trick is doing it in a practical amount of spins.
You mean the algorithm will find the statistical anomalies and let you know what to bet, how many number of spins does your algorithm require for training?
Single and series also must happen, although the theory say single and series hit =50% and it also succumb to variance.
thus a team of two could bet parlay+1, by betting a series and the other betting single.
WHOOSH
Quote from: Steve on Nov 13, 02:46 AM 2019
WHOOSH
Is that the sound of your money going out the window?
What happens in 100 spins ?
in online casino, the dealer will be switched twice!
Quote from: gizmotron2 on Nov 13, 09:18 AM 2019
Is that the sound of your money going out the window?
No, its the sound of wind between your ears.
Quote from: Steve on Nov 13, 03:04 PM 2019
No, its the sound of wind between your ears.
Well, I meant it rhetorically. I didn't mean your money. I meant his money.
Ah, right.
I was referring to this:
(link:s://i.imgflip.com/ozbuk.jpg)
thanks Steve and Gizmotron,
for your funny banters🤣.
now. we know that streak of two in EC must hit, how many streak of two, needed to profit?
and again, what the worst ever count of streak2, happen AT BOTH SIDE?
how about Double Dozens?
How many time dd will streak for 3hits in row?
It already stale that,
we need THREE UNITS to win six units with streak of three in dd bet.
That ONE unit per bet to win66% chance?
Quote from: SWEET on Nov 13, 11:24 PM 2019thanks Steve and Gizmotron,
for your funny banters
HE started it
many gamblers mesmerized, by the prospect of betting dd that when you win,
you win six,
but lose only 3,
with 66% chance.
the problems lie in though dd streaks are common, it still elusive by the streak problem itself, any ideas?
Quote from: Steve on Nov 13, 11:47 PM 2019
HE started it
Ha ha ha. I like Steve because we have both taken a lot of flack over the past two decades. He has a better attitude than I do. He is more tolerant. Gambling is a skill that comes from a lot of experience. We both recognize hopeless systems that can't possibly work. We see people come and go with so much excitement about their new found love for gambling and their secret systems that are going to change their lives forever. The casino is my very own ATM machine. I'm gonna be rich.
There are people all over the internet that want to help new players. But we also know that these same people don't want to be helped. It's all part and parcel of learning and gaining experience. New players must go thru the phases of learning. Very few stick with it. Very very few get real good at it.
Quote from: gizmotron2 on Nov 14, 05:42 AM 2019
Ha ha ha. I like Steve because we have both taken a lot of flack over the past two decades. He has a better attitude than I do. He is more tolerant. Gambling is a skill that comes from a lot of experience. We both recognize hopeless systems that can't possibly work. We see people come and go with so much excitement about their new found love for gambling and their secret systems that are going to change their lives forever. The casino is my very own ATM machine. I'm gonna be rich.
There are people all over the internet that want to help new players. But we also know that these same people don't want to be helped. It's all part and parcel of learning and gaining experience. New players must go thru the phases of learning. Very few stick with it. Very very few get real good at it.
yeah, very good self reflection for you and me and others
In next 100 spins?
One fact is, there will be at least 3 dealer’s shifts - supposing that we are talking about live roulette tables
If you know that a streak of three will happen in the next hundred spins, then there is a way to take advantage of that.
We know that if you win, then place that bet double and let it ride, then double it again and let it ride for a third bet, your 1 unit becomes 8.
Now... -97 but +8 leaves you in the negative...
BUT....
What a streak of three does (assuming you double each of these wins) turns 1 unit into 8, leaving you with a profit of 7 units. That's a profit of 7 times your original.
So for 100 spins....
Start with a very low amount, and simply raise your bet by 1/7th each time you hit a loss. This ensures that if you hit a streak of three and let the win ride for those three bets, you will win those 7 units.
An example.... I'll start with a multiple of 7 just for ease of explanation. (This is way higher than what you'd be betting, it's just a large number to show you.)
SO. $70. You know that if you double after each win it will look like:
Bet one: $70
Bet two: $140
Bet three: $280
Your last bet that wins was 280, so you finish with $560.
That's 8 times your start of $70. So you just earned, 7x that start bet.
(REMEMBER THIS PROFIT OF $490)
BUT SAY THAT ONE LOST. That's where we add 1/7th on top.
So 1 1/7 X 70 = 80.
So you now are betting $80.
First bet: $80
Second bet: $160
Third bet: $320
Your last bet was $320, giving you $640.
You bet 80$, plus your original bet of 70$
$640-(80+70)
= $490!!!!!
So, the profit will always be the same!.
I honestly start the cycle at $2, not 70.
So, as long as you get three in a row in 100 spins you will profit. Your start amount is based on your bankroll.
This works best with live European roulette, but sitting at a machine to take advantage of the50c increments so that your bet raises as close to 1/7th as possible