***TRILOGY***

[TwoCatSam]

Sam I indeed have a system close to a grail.

John,

I have a dog that's close to a horse.  Four legs, two ears, two eyes, one mouth full of teeth, poops on green grass, eats green grass, runs like the wind--darn near a horse!!!  But not a horse!!

Close is not good enough!!

Keep diggin'.  I should calculate where you are!!  You might pop up in my back yard.

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

Sam are you on meds???

Yes, I am and I can name them. 

Care for a list?

Does rheumatoid arthritis and asthma count against me?

Sam

[Johnlegend]

Sam I indeed have a system close to a grail.

John,

I have a dog that's close to a horse.  Four legs, two ears, two eyes, one mouth full of teeth, poops on green grass, eats green grass, runs like the wind--darn near a horse!!!  But not a horse!!

Close is not good enough!!

Keep diggin'.  I should calculate where you are!!  You might pop up in my back yard.

Sam

You just cant leave it alone can you. First I accepted Bayes offer then you sheepishly say GAME ON. Then you try to throw out baits hoping ole SAM will get this here grail before anyone else. By offering some kind of Paypal bribe. Shame on you a man of your years an all.

I have one goal. To let this awesome method speak for itself. Like I keep saying once enough people see this thing in action I wont have to convince anyone of anything ever again. I dont need anyone to fawn over me Sam this is where youve got it all wrong. I just need a few people to TRULY BELIEVE. THIS GAMES CAN BE METHODICALY BEATEN. No luck no math no Einstein babble. No VB. No Voodoo. Just a pure and honest method that has random cornered into submission. Thats where DOUBLE MATCH enters the fray.

[superman]

JL, Sam, this is getting a bit boring now, Sam we've had the fisty cuffs midweek, JL has now agreed to show us IF he can beat the RNG which will be kindly provided by Bayes, let's just get along for a while, there's too many threads getting over polpulated with the 2 of you.

IF JL loses or fails to do the test, then we can expect either an apology OR he will vanish, although I don't think he is the type of member to vanish after all the posts/activity he has.

IF JL manages to do as it says he can then he can expect OUR applause/apologies as there will be no way he can BS the RNG Bayes is going to provide.

IF however he says Bayes has fixed the RNG to eat him alive and he comes back saying the software was fixed/cheating/not random or whatever he can come up with, well, that will speak for itself.

So please fellas, in the meantime let's relax it a bit, it really is turning the forum into a bickering match, VLS went that way and still is that way, is this how all gambling/roulette forums end up? do we want that?

[buffalowizard]

Here here superman

[Johnlegend]

JL, Sam, this is getting a bit boring now, Sam we've had the fisty cuffs midweek, JL has now agreed to show us IF he can beat the RNG which will be kindly provided by Bayes, let's just get along for a while, there's too many threads getting over polpulated with the 2 of you.

IF JL loses or fails to do the test, then we can expect either an apology OR he will vanish, although I don't think he is the type of member to vanish after all the posts/activity he has.

IF JL manages to do as it says he can then he can expect OUR applause/apologies as there will be no way he can BS the RNG Bayes is going to provide.

IF however he says Bayes has fixed the RNG to eat him alive and he comes back saying the software was fixed/cheating/not random or whatever he can come up with, well, that will speak for itself.

So please fellas, in the meantime let's relax it a bit, it really is turning the forum into a bickering match, VLS went that way and still is that way, is this how all gambling/roulette forums end up? do we want that?

I've gotta say that's the best thing I've ever read from you Superman. You are right. I won't say Bayes has fixed anything if he hasn't Superman. that's how good two of my methods are. They will actually tell me when somethings not right. With live spns and Playmode RNGS I get like clockwork the breakdowns I expect. On Real money RNG something else alltogether is going on.

[Drazen]

Say marty broke that 12/1 in half over my next 500 games.

Dear mr. John, as you maybe know or don't know, this beautifull game we are discussing about, is mathematical game of randomness with unfair payout to the player (unless you are Advantage-play player)


So Its beautifull characteristics can be observed through mathematics so as its discipline statistics.
As you know if you studied it enough, that everything in the longterm has to show itself and has to balanced in the end.


So it is not problem to create such odds as you say 12/1 and that these odds show in longterm to us.


Main problem is that you don't have them with way you play and bet.


So i realy don't understand what your dear friend Marty has with bothering these odds in this case?
How did on Earth these odds get here? I think odds got drunk and lost here, or you drunk them LoL


Problem is that i can prove that you don't have such odds, but you can't prove who are you and that these results are real.
And if you don't have such odds you just can't have such results as you claim.


So i don't belive you a single word about results, and don't have anything against you or think something bad.


Nor i am expecting this your famous beating RNG, because it is not possible. But on other hand i ll be first from whom you ll get deepest apology and bowe to the ground if you succed, although i won't play like that even then, becasue that can't work like that 


Cheers mister


Drazen

[TwoCatSam]

Sup and Buff

OK, guys.  You're right.  I've even bored myself!!

I am going to say one more thing and then leave it be for a while.  Did anyone catch the insult to Bayes?  You know......I better copy this.....

Hang on.............

[Johnlegend]

Dear mr. John, as you maybe know or don't know, this beautifull game we are discussing about, is mathematical game of randomness with unfair payout to the player (unless you are Advantage-play player)


So Its beautifull characteristics can be observed through mathematics so as its discipline statistics.
As you know if you studied it enough, that everything in the longterm has to show itself and has to balanced in the end.


So it is not problem to create such odds as you say 12/1 and that these odds show in longterm to us.


Main problem is that you don't have them with way you play and bet.


So i realy don't understand what your dear friend Marty has with bothering these odds in this case?
How did on Earth these odds get here? I think odds got drunk and lost here, or you drunk them LoL


Problem is that i can prove that you don't have such odds, but you can't prove who are you and that these results are real.
And if you don't have such odds you just can't have such results as you claim.


So i don't belive you a single word about results, and don't have anything against you or think something bad.


Nor i am expecting this your famous beating RNG, because it is not possible. But on other hand i ll be first from whom you ll get deepest apology and bowe to the ground if you succed, although i won't play like that even then, becasue that can't work like that 


Cheers mister


Drazen

Drazen I don't think I will ever understand how you think. All this talk of this and that. Theres only one thing I look for. PROFIT. How I get it makes no difference to me. Its doing what isnt supposed to be possible. Trust me the RNGs going to be beaten if its fair. I've beaten over 10 different RNGS in play mode. The breakdowns they give are very similar to real live wheels. that's how I know they are fair. When however you play a real RNG. You get ridiculous breakdowns that simply aren't possible with true random. You will die of old age before youd seen them on a real wheel.

And that's because the wheel is reading your play then opposing your play. Whatever it takes to beat you.

[TwoCatSam]

I've gotta say that's the best thing I've ever read from you Superman. You are right. I won't say Bayes has fixed anything if he hasn't Superman. that's how good two of my methods are. They will actually tell me when somethings not right. With live spns and Playmode RNGS I get like clockwork the breakdowns I expect. On Real money RNG something else alltogether is going on.

For any of you with any knowledge of psychology, you will know what that sentence means.  Especially the "if he hasn't" phrase. 

How do we know Bayes has or hasn't?  He possibly will, hence the statement.  If John steps up and takes the test and loses, he has already planted the seeds for his excuse right here in this thread.  Bayes cheated him.  We don't know how, but Bayes did it!

Am I the only frickin' person on this forum who can see any of this???

I'll try to stay away.

Someone sent me a system to test.  Complete with rules!!

Sam

[TwoCatSam]

FOR THE SAKE OF TRUTH AND HONESTY, PLEASE DO NOT DELETE MY LAST POST!!!!


I screen-shot the post.  I will NOT let this go away.

[Johnlegend]

For any of you with any knowledge of psychology, you will know what that sentence means.  Especially the "if he hasn't" phrase. 

How do we know Bayes has or hasn't?  He possibly will, hence the statement.  If John steps up and takes the test and loses, he has already planted the seeds for his excuse right here in this thread.  Bayes cheated him.  We don't know how, but Bayes did it!

Am I the only frickin' person on this forum who can see any of this???

I'll try to stay away.

Someone sent me a system to test.  Complete with rules!!

Sam
[/quoteSam I will know trust me. And I will then show you how I know. But I want to believe Bayes is being fair about this. And If he is full respect and power to him. I would still find a way to prove I can beat random believe that. I am in this phase of showing instead of posting a method. Theres to many jaded fickle people in this game. Even if you land a holy grail in their laps they wont hit the ground running with it. A Warrior or Chauncy47 only come along once in a very long while.

[Drazen]

I am in this phase of showing instead of posting a method

Last year you said in this phase you should be i quote "conquering casinos all over Europe", with your SO POWERFULL methods.


But as i see you wont be going to travel soon because you have very hard (easy) competition to beat.


It is not something that fitts to man who can and has intention to "conquer" casinos. Go play, earn money and buy yourself a bentley and chateu on south of the France. That suits to your "power".




Regards


Drazen

[Johnlegend]

Last year you said in this phase you should be i quote "conquering casinos all over Europe", with your SO POWERFULL methods.


But as i see you won't be going to travel soon because you have very hard (easy) competition to beat.


It is not something that fitts to man who can and has intention to "conquer" casinos. Go play, earn money and buy yourself a bentley and chateu on south of the France. That suits to your "power".




Regards


Drazen

Drazen I have no interest in material things. Only spreading the word that this game is not unbeatable. I will be going to Europe later this year. My personal life didn't allow for it when I wanted. But the first thing I have to do is get minds thinking on what is supposed to be the best forum on the planet for roulette. Am I wrong? Then Once I've done that. I will show Sam how to pay his grand kids through College without even breaking a sweat. Then I'm out of here. Sam will blow my trumpet for me after that. My work on this forum will be done.

[Turner]

Sam I indeed have a system close to a grail.

John,

I have a dog that's close to a horse.  Four legs, two ears, two eyes, one mouth full of teeth, poops on green grass, eats green grass, runs like the wind--darn near a horse!!!  But not a horse!!

That was so fu*in funny....LMAO