Hi All,
In your opinion,
If I was to bet 34 numbers out of 37 would it be more advantageous to group the 3 numbers being left out or scatter them randomly around the wheel?
T
Whichever numbers you leave out, you can guarantee those three numbers are going to hit often enough to lead you into a loss. You have to win 35 times to recover 1 loss. Not worth the risk.
hey there
i think 34/37 numbers is a BAD idea
HOWEVER IF YOU MUST PLAY IT
limit to one or two spins a day
you will win 1 unit on american wheel and 2 units on euro wheel i believe
take your one unit and run, once a day
for a heavy hitter this is a dream
Quote from: come_on_melb_ole on Oct 29, 08:39 PM 2015
Hi All,
In your opinion,
If I was to bet 34 numbers out of 37 would it be more advantageous to group the 3 numbers being left out or scatter them randomly around the wheel?
T
I would record spins until you have 3 numbers left that have failed to show - then bet
against those numbers appearing for 1 spin.
(I would never play this way, but in my opinion if you're going to - this is the best way)
We already know that the last number to show could take 150+ spins, so that takes care of one of them, the 2nd and 3rd of the 3 that haven't shown lag behind also - just not to the same extent. I would think it safe to bet against those 3 showing up (for 1 spin max) and then start over.
Quote from: TurboGenius on Nov 06, 07:57 PM 2015
(I would never play this way, but in my opinion if you're going to - this is the best way)
I second this part.
If you can use some prediction method (visual balistics for example) that most of the time does not fail (for this particular case, I think if you can have an hit rate above 92% in 1.000.000 spins you are probably on something), you would group those 3 numbers according to the wheel. I think this should be a successful system, if it wasn't for the fact that placing 34 chips in real time, with litle time to do it is not easy thing to do. this of course for a real wheel.
For RNG, I don't know of any prediction method that could give us those results...
Lets see, you have 100% chance of hitting a chunk 4/38 and 0% chance of hitting the numbers on 34/38.
Or you divide the wheel into 4 and give each section a missing number to give you about a 1/9 chance of hitting on each section. Very interesting Dr. Jones.
Technically it is probably exactly the same.
The way I would do it is to find the 4 coldest numbers and and not bet those because there could be a defect preventing those numbers from coming up as much.
Quote from: FreeRoulette on Nov 13, 01:08 PM 2015
Lets see, you have 100% chance of hitting a chunk 4/38 and 0% chance of hitting the numbers on 34/38.
Or you divide the wheel into 4 and give each section a missing number to give you about a 1/9 chance of hitting on each section. Very interesting Dr. Jones.
Technically it is probably exactly the same.
The way I would do it is to find the 4 coldest numbers and and not bet those because there could be a defect preventing those numbers from coming up as much.
The 4 coldest numbers in how many spins backwards?
Hey vladir,
Good question. On a random number generator over 1000 spins, the coldest number usually hits around 14-18 times and mostly between 10 and 20 hits.
But who wants to track and see if those numbers are good or not. I would track the wheel until 34 numbers hit and bet those 34 numbers. The reason why, is that I know those numbers came up. If the wheel is even, then there is no problem betting the numbers, and if the remaining numbers have a defect then we are also covered.
::)
Odd. that's exactly what I said lol
Would it not be better the other way around, and back three numbers, rather than 34. And, BTW, what is VB when it is at home? Cerces