• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

The Belter

Started by buffalowizard, Aug 22, 07:31 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

buffalowizard

Hi BBJ,

yes that was a tough session. It would have been time to quit after the second consecutive 4 loss probably.

The LW would be to bet when a win comes after a loss. This could be just the one solitary bet until another trigger arrives. It's probably safer for this bet selection actually and the session you posted wouldn't have been so bad

BW

BBJ

In the last results I posted are 4 single W's in a row, and if I understand correctly, reaching the 4th loss with the LW strategy, so that can happen too then.   

Edit: I will do some more testing today, and will post it here, and maybe with a balance example with it.   Luckily I do this with fun money with a demo account  :)

buffalowizard

Yes that's correct BBJ. It would have been a losing session whichever way you attacked it. Hopefully these double losses are rare enough so that we can take advantage when they don't occur. Thanks for your testing mate

BW

Kingspin

I gave this a try at william hill live casino.    I started out ok and got a couple of wins straight off the mark then got a long string of losses.    you're looking at quick up or quick down using this method.   :(

Hit and run maybe. . .

Thanks for posting buffalow. . . . .

You cant always loose , but when you do loose you will win it all back.

buffalowizard

Quote from: Kingspin on Aug 23, 05:12 AM 2010
I gave this a try at william hill live casino.    I started out ok and got a couple of wins straight off the mark then got a long string of losses.    you're looking at quick up or quick down using this method.   :(

Hit and run maybe. . .

Thanks for posting buffalow. . . . .



That's ok Kingspin, thanks for the testing. Back to the drawing board I guess!

BBJ

Some new results, a bit avarage I think, half bad half good, 2 times a 4th loss and 17 losses in a row. 

29
  8
  3 W
10 L
  0 L
10 W
36 L
10 W
  7 L
11 W
  1 W
  2 W
24 L
12 L
  9 L
  3 W
11 W
  6 W
  3 W
19 L
34 L
  1 L
  7 W
24 L
34 L
17 L
20 L - 4th loss
35 L
18 L
19 L
34 L
12 L
23 L
  2 L
29 L
21 L
16 L
36 L
  6 L
27 L - 17th loss
  1 W
31 L
34 W
26 L
33 W
35 W
29 W
  3 L
31 W
  1 W
11 L
  4 W
34 L
10 L
  0 L
35 W
20 L
12 L
  3 L
32 L - 4th loss
13 L
34 W
25 L
17 L
  7 L
  2 W
  2 W
36 L


BBJ

Some more results, I think a bit too many L's and too many single W's.

  2
22
  0 L
22 W
  2 W
35 L
33 W
24 W
  9 L
18 L
36 L
  7 L - 4th loss
20 L
11 L
16 W
33 L
20 L
20 W
  1 L
  4 W
  5 W
10 L
27 L
12 W
31 L
33 W
  7 L
12 L
31 L
14 W
12 W
36 W
19 L
27 W
10 L
32 L
24 L
  0 L - 4th loss
  7 L
20 W
  2 W
11 L
  3 W
30 L
27 L
26 W
16 L
14 W
19 W
  6 L
14 L
  2 W
36 L
  4 W
  7 W

buffalowizard

Great testing BBJ. Maybe the LW strategy isn't the best way for this, and to go back to the original.

So only one test so far where there are 2 lots of consecutive 4 losses, which would be the natural stop/loss point.

BW


-