The problem with a high hit rate bet selection such as 5 lines is on a loss you lose all profits, every win yields 1 unit while every loss loses 5 units. Therefore the win streaks dont compensate
How can we overcome this?
I think a positive progression can overcome
Take a 5 line bet selection
On a win add a unit
The way i see it is 3 wins in a row will be common place on 5 lines
If you add a unit
Spin 1, 1 unit each position- win 1 unit
Spin 2, 2 unit each position- win 2 units
Spin 3, 3 units each position- win 3 units
We are up 6 units
Now we lose, lose 5 units still plus 1
When we lose back to 1 unit
Maybe with a high hit rate high number strategy with a positive progression we have something
No trigger needed. Every spin
Always put a chip on 0. Well because f*** 0
You may lose 5u in 1st spin, 9u in 2nd spin, 12u in 3rd spin. Also if you add 1 on zero...
Its roulette. Possible
You mean 5 then 10 then 15 then add 1 for 0
Point im making is if we can make a 5 line strategy that wins 3 for ever 1 loss with a positive progression then we have a winning system
The expectation is to win over 75 percent of the time covering 5 Lines
Mathematically we will win over 75 percent of the time
On a plus 1 positive progression on a win i think this is good
First you place 5 u, then you earn 1 and add 4 new units (5+4=9) to place 10 (5x2), then you earn 2 and add new 3 (9+3=12) to place 15 (5x3) units...
Just saying, maybe the idea is good, also?!
I would treat zero as one of 7 losing numbers.
Quote from: nextyear on Sep 24, 12:36 PM 2015
First you place 5 u, then you earn 1 and add 4 new units (5+4=9) to place 10 (5x2), then you earn 2 and add new 3 (9+3=12) to place 15 (5x3) units...
Just saying, maybe the idea is good, also?!
I would treat zero as one of 7 losing numbers.
On paper the idea is good. Mathematically you should win at least 3 times to 1. On a positive progression it should win
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Sep 24, 12:57 PM 2015
On paper the idea is good. Mathematically you should win at least 3 times to 1. On a positive progression it should win
If I've got this right, betting 5 lines should mathematically win 5 times out of every 6 spins
(excluding the zero)
O0
Quote from: ddarko on Sep 24, 01:30 PM 2015
If I've got this right, betting 5 lines should mathematically win 5 times out of every 6 spins
(excluding the zero)
O0
Yes. So with a positive progression on a win only should win consistently
On a positive progression 3 consecutive wins to 1 loss leaves u in positive
Always insurance on 0
Actually im wrong
If lose at step 4 lose 20 units after winning only 6
Have to re think this
Perhaps a positive progression 1-2 then back to 1
On a win goto 2 units then right back to 1
1 unit each position
If win
2 units each position
Win or lose back to
1 unit each position
Hit and run may be the theme here
could always do the ol' 3/2...3 units on high or low and 1 unit on 2 DS of your choice.same coverage,less risk,easier to recover.
Quote from: onetaste on Sep 24, 11:13 PM 2015
could always do the ol' 3/2...3 units on high or low and 1 unit on 2 DS of your choice.same coverage,less risk,easier to recover.
3 on low 2 on 3rd dozen
On a loss
6 on high 4 on 1st dozen
Then pray for 3 conescutive wins to recover
Theres a system for this have to find it
Try this: wait for a line to hit three times in six spins. Bet all lines except that one once.
why don,t you do a john legend style matrix 6 wide....put 1st line in..next line start betting against the ds above and bet the rest but place units 1..2..3..4..5..on the rest of the ds.using the matrix results above line in the order they are in to put your units on...same for each line pf matrix...bet against 1st result put units 1..2..3..4..5..in that order on the ds streets in the order above your best flat betting until end of line..ie 5 spins...just an idea never tested it just throwing it out there :ooh: so a 15 unit bet...
Im very familiar with matrixes
Thanks for the idea. Ill try to make something
testing a 5 wide DS matrix
write results left to right, play vertically
bet that the above DS wont repeat
in laymens terms you are betting that the DS 5 back will not repeat
6 0 2 2 2
0 5 4 1 4
3 6 1 6 1
insurance on 0 so far so good
thanks for the ideas guys
will also test a 6 wide, or 6 back
I dig it Ghost,Let us know how it goes..Always intrigued by matrix systems,dunno why.Think I just like saying the word "matrix". ha