Russian Jet

RouletteGhost · Apr 13, 09:22 PM 2016

link:://:.militarytimes.com/story/military/2016/04/13/russian-su-24-attack-aircraft-us-navy-destroyer-donald-cook-baltic-sea/82979184/

MrJ · Apr 13, 09:42 PM 2016

US Navy....best in world history. I'm not that worried.

Ken

MrJ · Apr 13, 09:50 PM 2016

link:s://m100group.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/rimpac-us-navy-biofuels-leon-kaye.jpg

RouletteGhost · Apr 13, 09:52 PM 2016

i just think putin is funny sometimes

Steve · Apr 13, 10:06 PM 2016

1. The navy's real power is deploying aircraft for bombing. They can also launch missiles. But a long range stealth bomber can be launched from anywhere, and reach anywhere in the world. The main military power comes from the sky.

2. It used to be that the USA was the supreme military power. Not anymore. Russia and China have their own stealth technology. In a 1 on 1 war between the USA and China, the USA would not win. Not even close. China has every bit the capability to strike, with far more troops to mop up. And you think the USA won WW2? Nope, Russia did. Russia by far did greatest damage to Germany. And Russia was about to take Japan then the USA dropped the nukes. The only nukes ever to be used in war, and the preach nuclear control.

3. If it was the US that flew over a Russian ship, that'd be just fine. Because you know, they were just checking who was there and what was going on. But if Russia does the same thing, the media makes a big deal of it.

4. Putin is a far better leader than Obama, who breaks international law for breakfast. Putin is against the NWO. Obama is part of it. If you think otherwise, you need to stop watching Fox news

RouletteGhost · Apr 13, 10:09 PM 2016

Quote from: Steve on Apr 13, 10:06 PM 2016
1. The navy's real power is deploying aircraft for bombing. They can also launch missiles. But a long range stealth bomber can be launched from anywhere, and reach anywhere in the world. The main military power comes from the sky.

2. It used to be that the USA was the supreme military power. Not anymore. Russia and China have their own stealth technology. In a 1 on 1 war between the USA and China, the USA would not win. Not even close. China has every bit the capability to strike, with far more troops to mop up.

yes. on a one on one it would be terrible. noone would win. with the weapons technology, EMPs, nuclear ETC ETC it is a lose lose

3. If it was the US that flew over a Russian ship, that'd be just fine. Because you know, they were just checking who was there and what was going on. But if Russia does the same thing, the media makes a big deal of it.

of course, our media here is extremely biased

4. Putin is a far better leader than Obama, who breaks international law for breakfast. Putin is against the NWO. Obama is part of it. If you think otherwise, you need to stop watching Fox news

i agree. i know A LOT about this. putin is anti nwo thats why NATO is targeting him. putin will become the worlds top organic producer..against big pharmas and monsantos best interest who own our govt...i am very in tune with this stuff. at the end of the day i still love my country though

MrJ · Apr 13, 10:11 PM 2016

Sorry, US military might guy here >> link:://:.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a20388/how-the-us-marines-fight/

MrJ · Apr 13, 10:12 PM 2016

Quote from: Steve on Apr 13, 10:06 PM 2016
1. The navy's real power is deploying aircraft for bombing. They can also launch missiles. But a long range stealth bomber can be launched from anywhere, and reach anywhere in the world. The main military power comes from the sky.

2. It used to be that the USA was the supreme military power. Not anymore. Russia and China have their own stealth technology. In a 1 on 1 war between the USA and China, the USA would not win. Not even close. China has every bit the capability to strike, with far more troops to mop up. And you think the USA won WW2? Nope, Russia did. Russia by far did greatest damage to Germany. And Russia was about to take Japan then the USA dropped the nukes. The only nukes ever to be used in war, and the preach nuclear control.

3. If it was the US that flew over a Russian ship, that'd be just fine. Because you know, they were just checking who was there and what was going on. But if Russia does the same thing, the media makes a big deal of it.

4. Putin is a far better leader than Obama, who breaks international law for breakfast. Putin is against the NWO. Obama is part of it. If you think otherwise, you need to stop watching Fox news

NATO alone could beat Russia.

Ken

MrJ · Apr 13, 10:15 PM 2016

link:s://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_military_expenditures

Steve · Apr 13, 10:20 PM 2016

RG, I love my country too. The people, the land etc. But the "leaders" are a disgrace. When people say they hate the USA, they are more referring to international US policy. There's nothing to like about it.

The people that hate the USA and its people etc are people like muslim extremists. Extreme, unjustified and delusional hatred.

Ken, there's no way those figures would be completely accurate. But the main reason the US spends the most because they're the ones invading and bombing other countries.

NATO is half the world. But if it was NATO vs China & Russia, then NATO would lose. But if it was a nuclear war, then we're all ****ed. Especially the northern hemisphere. I'm all cozy down here.

Steve · Apr 13, 10:22 PM 2016

I bet its only a matter of time that a nuke will be used for terrorism. But I expect it will be another false flag. And when it happens, well, shit. A lot of panic, a lot of rushed through laws to control the population, martial law etc.

RouletteGhost · Apr 13, 10:25 PM 2016

Quote from: Steve on Apr 13, 10:20 PM 2016
RG, I love my country too. The people, the land etc. But the "leaders" are a disgrace. When people say they hate the USA, they are more referring to international US policy. There's nothing to like about it.

Yup

MrJ · Apr 13, 10:25 PM 2016

Our Coast Guard spending alone could take down a small country. China teaming up with Russia vs. the US by ITSELF? I say it would be close. Now throw in US allies? Its a done deal.

Dont forget the MANY times other countries WANTED our military help and we said no.....you dont hear much about that on the news.

Ken

MrJ · Apr 13, 10:29 PM 2016

Quote from: Steve on Apr 13, 10:22 PM 2016
I bet its only a matter of time that a nuke will be used for terrorism. But I expect it will be another false flag. And when it happens, well, shit. A lot of panic, a lot of rushed through laws to control the population, martial law etc.

There are different levels of nukes, most people dont grasp that. A few over "selective" targets? I'm all for that. You set off a bomb at an airport? Ok, now a nuke gets shoved up your a**....BOOOM!!!!

Next crises?

Ken

RouletteGhost · Apr 13, 10:31 PM 2016

Quote from: Steve on Apr 13, 10:22 PM 2016
I bet its only a matter of time that a nuke will be used for terrorism. But I expect it will be another false flag. And when it happens, well, shit. A lot of panic, a lot of rushed through laws to control the population, martial law etc.

The problem is that false flags happen. No denying that.

Conspiracy theorists think EVERYTHING is a false flag though.

News:

Russian Jet