• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Voyager near Solar System's edge

Started by Twisteruk, Dec 15, 06:00 AM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Twisteruk

Its Set In Stone =)

iggiv


Twisteruk

Its Set In Stone =)

iggiv


Twisteruk

Its Set In Stone =)

iggiv

i thought u are in UK, but u r in Australia? where everything is upside down?  ;D

Twisteruk

everything is upsidedown back to front insideout, it doesn't stop. A bit like Infinity Lol
Its Set In Stone =)

esoito

Quote from: iggiv on Jan 14, 11:02 AM 2011
Not everything. there are always strict rules like probability or gravity. I don't believe that on any planet in universe  heavy things just fly in the air or roulette gives them every day 100 blacks in a row, then 120 reds. unless it is very biased of course.  ;D

Beliefs. We all have them. I even believe the opposite to you. Here're some of the reasons why:

It was originally thought that, aerodynamically, the bumblebee should not be able to fly. But nobody told the bumblebee -- it flies perfectly well.

In fact, these days, there's a better understanding of the 'lift' caused by different types of airflow.

And, of course, on some planets there might well be life but not 'air'as we understand it.

The alternative might be denser and better able to support 'heavy things' (bearing in mind the word 'heavy' is a function of whatever gravity exists on that planet.)

So talking in black and white categorical statements and absolutes is often quite risky.

So whereas I believe you to be wrong I also believe that I am quite likely wrong, too!  ;)

link:://:.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090507194511.htm





esoito


-