Betting against the "X" system. (Someone make a bot!)

[Skakus]

 
I'd like to know how we got in the box in the first place? 

[ashwinsinha]

how about we consider A as the the dozen and bet against that dozen coming in x pattern shown by TCS here.... for example below

lets consider A as dozen 1

Now we bet against dozen 1 by betting one unit on dozen 2 & 3 each only in the A's as shown by TCS which again i have added below....

A - - - A-
  -A - A-
      A
  -A - A-
-A - - - A

- -  are just spins where we wait
Since i chose to bet that dozen 1 will not come in the A's above i backing 2 & 3 exactly during A's....
We can use Flat_ino's progression +2 on a loss and -1 on a win or else TDM 2 dozen progression
with 1-1, 3-3 and recovery with 2-2, 4-4.... let me know i need feedback..... i have not tested     

[Drazen]

Random vs. "random"

When you collide two randoms in the casino what might happen?

Where that opposed energy will go after collision?

Maybe you wouldnt like to play with so much energy on opposite sides? 

Cheers

Drazen

[Gizmotron]

Random vs. "random"
When you collide two randoms in the casino what might happen?
Where will that opposed energy will go after collision?
Maybe you wouldnt like to play with so much energy on opposite sides? 

Number one, forget about expecting anything. Using random with random can
be highly profitable. If you are experiencing a run of red numbers you can also,
at the same time, experience a run of odd numbers. If you combine those then
you are only playing nine numbers. Sometimes these combinations include ten
numbers. If those things continue then you can even bet big on those high or
low combinations. That's four or five numbers. There are other ways than that too.
You can bet on the odd numbers from two dozens or two columns. It all comes
down to reading the current conditions.

[Gizmotron]

Truth be told, this randomness stuff, this following trends, it doesn't work. It never did. It never will. It's always been mathematically impossible. Don't waste your time.

[ugly bob]

Truth be told, this randomness stuff, this following trends, it doesn't work. It never did. It never will. It's always been mathematically impossible. Don't waste your time.

What has happened gizmotron? It is not like you to say following a trend is a waste of time. I am curious now.


bob.

[Gizmotron]

What has happened gizmotron? It is not like you to say following a trend is a waste of time. I am curious now.

bob.

I'm going underground and I don't wish to discuss this topic anymore. I'm just
baiting the nay sayers as I go. 4 more years of Obama calls for it.

[Skakus]

I'm going underground and I don't wish to discuss this topic anymore. I'm just
baiting the nay sayers as I go. 4 more years of Obama calls for it.

Good luck with that!

Hope to see you on the other side of the 4 year long tunnel.    

[ashwinsinha]

I'm going underground and I don't wish to discuss this topic anymore. I'm just
baiting the nay sayers as I go. 4 more years of Obama calls for it.

You should ask obama to remove the double zero on roulette  i guess romney would have reluctantly agreed LOLZ