• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

The only way to beat roulette is by increasing accuracy of predictions (changing the odds). This is possible on many real wheels.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Luck? Turned $285 bankroll to $5300g

Started by Js2k1985, Sep 27, 05:26 PM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: ego on Sep 30, 06:32 AM 2015
There is two kind of members when it comes to flat betting.

1) One show method and it works sometimes.
2) Comes with empty claims and empty words about flat betting with no example.

To this i can add there does not exist any secret method.
No one can turn a game with negative expectation into a positive game.

Cheers

Exactly

What i seek is a system with a high hit rate where you can get in and get out

Before the variance gets ya

I have plenty now from my years here
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

denzie

Years? Then you got your method for sure. There is really good stuff here.

But most are looking for something easy..fast...and if possible with no losing sessions.
All the ones I play with success takes patience. But they work though. I get my share of losses too. But my graphs going to the north east....

Till recently I started some new approach with something that's posted here for years. My br grows damn fast. Point being...there are money makers under our noses here. But of course you still need to control yourself and use some gut feeling.

And yes flat.
As spins roll off our predictions get better

thelaw

Quote from: helena on Sep 30, 05:05 AM 2015
I read the same things all the time and disagree.

Seriously!!! We are tolerating this again............right after the whole PA debacle? :question:

Helena (Falkor, Kimo, PA, etc), why are you here if you have a winning system?
You sir.......are a monster!!!

RouletteGhost

Quote from: thelaw on Sep 30, 08:37 AM 2015
Seriously!!! We are tolerating this again............right after the whole PA debacle? :question:

Helena (Falkor, Kimo, PA, etc), why are you here if you have a winning system?


Thats the point ive been making for a looooong time. If you have a system and come to this forum and are secretive expect heat

Why gloat that you have something?

To cause disruption?

"Email me you know who you are"- statements like that are also counter productive. That could have been PMed

Why say "people just want a free lunch"  . uh excuse me, this is a roulette forum. We are here to discuss roulette and strategies. Not to say we have something but not share

Counter productive

And no, im not talking about helena. Im talking in general. But, if the shoe fits.....
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

thelaw

Here is what I propose :

Once you claim to have a winning system, but refuse to share it, you are ignored on all threads moving forward, because clearly you are a trolling.
:thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

helena

And the private forum you invited me to is for what RouletteGhost?  Don't be a hypocrite....

You have been on my ignore list for a long time thelaw.  You contribute nothing useful with your negativity.

ego


I hope it is your last post Helena, because we don't tolerate nonsense.
We need less members with empty words and empty claims, what we want is productive members.

Cheers
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: helena on Sep 30, 08:59 AM 2015
And the private forum you invited me to is for what RouletteGhost?  Don't be a hypocrite....

You have been on my ignore list for a long time thelaw.  You contribute nothing useful with your negativity.

Its not private. All the contributors from here are there. Even invited mods a way back

I didnt want guests to see lankys system thats all

Members only. Free. Not private if one JOINS

So there you have it. Im not a hypocrite. Every single contributor on this forum was invited and most r there. Silly person you

I put a lot of work into laying out lankys system and doing my best to make images to describe it.

So the nice guy that i am i mad a forum specifically for lankys method. I did so to share with the good contributors.

What have you done?
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

denzie

So ooooh. .....how about that marty? I'm still curious on those tests  :)
As spins roll off our predictions get better

ego


I know Lanky from the past and i would like to read about hes method you mention.
Is the forum Roulette Insanaty or is it another forum - PM me.

Many Thanks
Denial of gamblers fallacy is usually seen in people who has Roulette as last option for a way to wealth, debt covering and a independent lifestyle.  Next step is pretty ugly-
AP - It's not that it can't be done, but rather people don't really have a clue as to the level of fanaticism and outright obsession that it takes to be successful, let alone get to the level where you can take money out of the casinos on a regular basis. Out of 1,000 people that earnestly try, maybe only one will make it.

onetaste

I agree with Ghost..How is a forum private if it's open to the public and anyone can join? Just because he doesnt blaber about it and beg people to join doesnt make it private.I believe another reason he started it was to eliminate alot of the bickering and BS that seeps into this forum and makes an otherwise productive forum counterproductive.A breath of fresh air to have a forum that cuts to the chase and every single post is productive post about roulette with no riddles,bible versus,poems,fairy tales,or guessing games.It was needed.

RouletteGhost

Quote from: onetaste on Sep 30, 09:32 AM 2015
I agree with Ghost..How is a forum private if it's open to the public and anyone can join? Just because he doesnt blaber about it and beg people to join doesnt make it private.I believe another reason he started it was to eliminate alot of the bickering and BS that seeps into this forum and makes an otherwise productive forum counterproductive.A breath of fresh air to have a forum that cuts to the chase and every single post is productive post about roulette with no riddles,bible versus,poems,fairy tales,or guessing games.It was needed.

Thats why i made it man. For the exact reasons u just said

No bull. Just straight up good contributors
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

ddarko

Quote from: thelaw on Sep 30, 08:55 AM 2015
Here is what I propose :

Once you claim to have a winning system, but refuse to share it, you are ignored on all threads moving forward, because clearly you are a trolling.
:thumbsup:

Denzie was one of those P.A. Eureka guys, stating 32 W & 1 L (because he made a mistake) does this rule apply
to him ?

O0

thelaw

Quote from: ddarko on Sep 30, 09:35 AM 2015
Denzie was one of those P.A. Eureka guys, stating 32 W & 1 L (because he made a mistake) does this rule apply
to him ?

O0

Did he share the system?

If not, then yes. he has lost credibility.

If yes, then no problem........... :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

denzie

Quote from: ddarko on Sep 30, 09:35 AM 2015
Denzie was one of those P.A. Eureka guys, stating 32 W & 1 L (because he made a mistake) does this rule apply
to him ?

O0

You want problems Mr I not showed nothing at all?
I suggest you keep it at pm's only.


As spins roll off our predictions get better

-