Multiplayer roulette ready

[Steve]

Number of spins visible now

[Blood Angel]

Number of spins visible now

Brilliant!

[Drazen]

I am getting "Invalid login." message although my username and password are correct.

Didnt had that problem yesterday dough.

[ati]

All inactive accounts were deleted.

[MumboJumbo]

I am getting "Invalid login." message although my username and password are correct.

Didnt had that problem yesterday dough.

Sure you have, because you don't playing, why do you need account anyway?

[RouletteGhost]

I think the theory of having to play an obscene amount of spins is flawed

Noone is going to play hundreds of thousands of spins

Most here want something that wins and to pull out

Win and leave before the house edge bites

Noone is going to say "gee i won, let me sit here until i grow a beard just to see if it survives 25000 spins"

In any sane mans eyes seeing what pri has done with 500 spins is fine by me if it can be repeater

[TurboGenius]

In any sane mans eyes seeing what pri has done with 500 spins is fine by me if it can be repeater

I'm insane. lol

I used the analogy in the chat window there but will say it here too -
I there was a car for sale that could go 70mph - but would only work maybe 30 minutes out of a week,
the rest of the time you had to just park it.... then no one sane would invest their time or money into buying it
or using it. Someone could say how great a car it is and how great it runs - but it won't mean much to anyone
since it's so limited in it's use.
In roulette - in order for something to be worthy of even the risk of playing, it has to hold up against spins - time - the house edge and still do the best compared to other ways of playing.
Granted there are some who say that the very best way to play this game is to put everything you have on red (or black) for one spin and then never play again...... But that's useless to people wanting a method or strategy they can use on a reg basis when they play at the casino.

[Steve]

rg, again I need to be direct. Theres a difference between what you want, what you think, and reality.

The reality is theres no specific number of spins that gives conclusive results. Simply more testing means more conclusive. You originally were saying Priyankas system must be good. But The video I posted showed many more spins and how volatile the win rate was. Really with so few spins played by members, Id actually expect more players to have win rates around 2 or 3. You saw I could do it with a random system in rx, over thousands of spins.

It would be great if the roulette wheel was an ATM, but its not. The closest you can get is roulette computers. Its not me being biased. Simply nothing else gets such a high edge and in so little time. Even better might be precognition IF it worked. I believe its only a matter of time before its common.

what pri has done with 500 spins is fine by me if it can be repeater

You are still not understanding. Everyone could be using the same system on different spins, and unless the system is a genuine winner, the overall result from all players will be a loss. Sure there will be the 3.2 win rates, the 1.0s, the 0.5s etc.

25,000 spins is statistically relevant. A bias player would easily see that many spins in their life, and a successful one earns more than someone working 9-5 at a desk. The desk job is comparatively a huge waste of time. So think relative.

Id also love a short term winning system that will win most times. Thats exactly the same as a long term winner actually. it does exist. its what AP is, but it doesnt work everywhere, and it requires old fashion work.

[Steve]

I know what you want is something super simple and mechanical, that just works. Only if it were that simple. You need to allign reality with expectation.

[RouletteGhost]

Well i disagree on the number of spins thing

If someone played 20 spins a day and died with 1 million in winnings would u say "its actually a loser they just didn't play enough"

At this point its all irrelevant then

If someone can play everyday a small batch of spins and win who is anyone to say its not good?

Not you. Not me.

[Blood Angel]

Got to say I'm with Turbo and Steve on this. I have had flat bet methods that have won over thousands of spins... Then died on me. 500 spins, I'm afraid is nothing. If I get to 25000 spins with something and I'm still winning then I may get a little excited.
A small batch of spins everyday adds up to a lot of spins doesn't it?

[RouletteGhost]

I'm insane. lol

I used the analogy in the chat window there but will say it here too -
I there was a car for sale that could go 70mph - but would only work maybe 30 minutes out of a week,
the rest of the time you had to just park it.... then no one sane would invest their time or money into buying it
or using it. Someone could say how great a car it is and how great it runs - but it won't mean much to anyone
since it's so limited in it's use.
In roulette - in order for something to be worthy of even the risk of playing, it has to hold up against spins - time - the house edge and still do the best compared to other ways of playing.
Granted there are some who say that the very best way to play this game is to put everything you have on red (or black) for one spin and then never play again...... But that's useless to people wanting a method or strategy they can use on a reg basis when they play at the casino.

If said person uses a trigger then that person will not go 70mph all the time

[Steve]

rg whats the difference between:

a. Ten players that plays 10 spins on different days,

b. One player that plays 100 spins in 1 day

c. One player that plays 1 spin per day over 100 days

Its all 100 spins. Theres no difference if the odds are no different, and almost every system has  NO effect of the odds.

Also the typical trigger does not at all change the odds. So triggers are based on delusion, not fact.

You say you disagree. In this case its not about opinion. Its simply whether or not you understand it. The solution to a mathematical equation is not an opinion.

[Steve]

Really Im trying to help. This is all just fundamental stuff. Just the basics. Every player needs to understand it. The lack of such basic understanding makes casino staff laugh.

But casino staff have their own delusion too. I spoke to one today who had no clue about roulette AP. Completely uneducated with no idea. This was supposed to be a very experienced staff member who teaches other senior staff members. It was fantastic to see the bright future of AP.

[RouletteGhost]

Steve

It is not 100 percent my opinion

Roulette has upper limits in certain patterns

Triggers can be used successfully to exploit that

Its not a delusion