PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[F_LAT_INO]

George,
I'm getting tired of doing all this,especially when I seen 500 something yesterdays spins of Wiesbaden,so am giving up.I think that I have proved my point,and we can continue this
thing privately when I get some rest and the swimming time.For time been will be taking
some holliday days.Good luck.

[F_LAT_INO]

Forgot to unswer on your question--yes its a 16 number bet,or 5/4 bet,which
can only lose if these 4 furthest sectors don't hit for at least 13 spins,and NO BET MODE
keeps it alive.The third version you can test some;
Betting each spin except when 3 sectors are in the same dozen or column/as we know
for how long these can go sleeping/--hope you got it.

[GLC]

George,
I'm getting tired of doing all this,especially when I seen 500 something yesterdays spins of Wiesbaden,so am giving up.I think that I have proved my point,and we can continue this
thing privately when I get some rest and the swimming time.For time been will be taking
some holliday days.Good luck.

F_LAT_INO,

I completely understand.  Having done a few tests I know it does chew up a lot of time.  I can only imagine how long it takes to trasfer it to the spreadsheet.

Thanks for the tip on the different way to play.  After playing and becoming familiar with your original way, I understand exactly how to play it.  It can give you more betting opportunities.  I'll test it and see which version I like the best.  I tend toward safety, so probably the original.

If I have any other questions, I'll PM you.

Thanks again for your patience and for this very interesting system.

George

[GLC]

George,
I'm getting tired of doing all this,especially when I seen 500 something yesterdays spins of Wiesbaden,so am giving up.I think that I have proved my point,and we can continue this
thing privately when I get some rest and the swimming time.For time been will be taking
some holliday days.Good luck.

F_LAT_INO,

Iboba, I feel much better knowing this system was brought to the forum by someone of your calibur.  I have been an avid reader of many of your systems on the other forums and have learned a lot about roulette from you and many of the other contributers.  I wasn't posting, only reading back then.  Trying to earn my wings, so to speak.

Do you really think Compa's R/B system is better than this system?  I am really impressed with the win/loss ratio of this system.  I will be really shocked if it doesn't continue to win on a regular basis.

I know that you are frustrated with all the stuff that went on around this system and you think all that killed it, but I'm going to continue to test it and post results for all to see.  Maybe not in as detailed as way as you did.  I'm still a working bloke, but as time allows and until it tanks and proves to be a long-term loser, I'll keep it alive.

I'm going to play for a 100 unit win target with a 300 unit stop loss.  I'll continue to use the Weisbaden spins posted for table 3 and we'll see how it does.

Regards,

George

P.S.  I did some testing on the alternate way to play that you mentioned and I'm not as impressed with it as I am with the original way.

[F_LAT_INO]

Good on you George,
Continue testing and you shall find out.
Respect Winkels words--nothing without a hard work.

[F_LAT_INO]

Good on you George,
Both methods are as equally good.The Compas method/we started it 2 years ago in somewhat different way/but same basis/and finally Compa arrived with this idea.
Furthermore I included column 2 into this bet/cause without each other-col.2-3,and thats how it all started/individually it can hardly work on the long basis.Wont explain why,cause it should be self explanatory to real roulette players.Here is an idea how you should test this bet,and you will see what am I about.Actually I just realised it would giving you it in the wron thread,therefore after afternoon swimming will explain it in the Compas way.

[F_LAT_INO]

Good on you George,
Both methods are as equally good.The Compas method/we started it 2 years ago in somewhat different way/but same basis/and finally Compa arrived with this idea.
Furthermore I included column 2 into this bet/cause without each other-col.2-3,and that's how it all started/individually it can hardly work on the long basis.Wont explain why,cause it should be self explanatory to real roulette players.Here is an idea how you should test this bet,and you will see what am I about.Actually I just realised I would giving you it in the wrong thread,therefore after afternoon swimming will explain it in the Compas way.

[VLS]

Hello dear iboba,

I have removed the password from your post above.

You should make it customary to never reveal any passwords online.

Regards!

[F_LAT_INO]

Hello dear iboba,

I have removed the password from your post above.

You should make it customary to never reveal any passwords online.

Regards!

OK mate,
I thought it would be harmles as I never play on line for real money,just testings.
I might as well delete my post then.

[GLC]

For anyone who had trouble understanding this system, I am going to get refocused on it and see if we can't beat it till it squeals.

FLATINO has been playing this system on dublinbet for 4 months and let me log on using his username and password to show me that he has built his account from 1000 units to 7300 units.  I'm impressed once again. 

Others of you have indicated being interested in dusting it off, so let's start testing and asking questions and try to nail down a way to play for anyone who wants to have a winning system.

The best way to get up to speed is to read his original post and go through his spreadsheet.  It really does have the whole system right there.  There may be a typo or two, but try not to get sidetracked with the trivial.

Ask any questions and I'll try to answer them and if I'm not sure F. will be glad to help out when he takes a break from hauling Euros out of the casinos by the bucketfulls back to his bungalow on the coast of the Adriatic Sea.  Okay, got a little carried away.  After all, I was born in Arkansas and Arkies get a little colorful in the way they describe things.

As we all know there are few if any systems that every detail is chisled in stone.  So, there are options with this system as well.

Let's be patient and we'll see where this takes us.

George

[GLC]

Alberto asked

starting to test the system
i do not understand the progression
i am betting on bettable trigger like 1489
it came
12
14
18
26 so it its at 4th step wich means I was at my second 16 bet
i am now -12

what I do next?
continue betting for same 1489 starting at 8 chips?
wait for new triggerÃ,»

thanks

Alberto

Alberto, No. Do not continue betting the same 4 sectors after a hit.  You cross off the furthest back sector that hit and replace it with the missing sector of the furthest back 4 sectors.  So your new 4 furthest back will be 149 and the one that will replace the 8 sector.

F_LAT_INO always shot for +10 for a win.  If he got close, like -12 he would usually go back 1 step sometimes 2 steps.  In this case I think you could either go back to 1 unit on each or stay at 2 units on each.  There is some subjectivity in the progression.  If I get up +8 units, I tend to reset back to my 1st 1 unit on each level.

One thing I've noticed about progressions is that if you have a winning bet, almost any progression will win.  Some are just more aggressive than others so you have to have a larger bank because you will go deeper in the hole, but you'll also go higher in the plus on winning streaks.

One thing he just gently pointed out to me since he has noticed that I tend toward aggressive progressions is that if you get shot it's better to only get wounded than killed.  I think I get the message.

George

[F_LAT_INO]

For anyone who had trouble understanding this system, I am going to get refocused on it and see if we can't beat it till it squeals.

F_LAT_INO has been playing this system on dublinbet for 4 months and let me log on using his username and password to show me that he has built his account from 1000 units to 7300 units.  I'm impressed once again. 

Others of you have indicated being interested in dusting it off, so let's start testing and asking questions and try to nail down a way to play for anyone who wants to have a winning system.

The best way to get up to speed is to read his original post and go through his spreadsheet.  It really does have the whole system right there.  There may be a typo or two, but try not to get sidetracked with the trivial.

Ask any questions and I'll try to answer them and if I'm not sure F. will be glad to help out when he takes a break from hauling Euros out of the casinos by the bucketfulls back to his bungalow on the coast of the Adriatic Sea.  Okay, got a little carried away.  After all, I was born in Arkansas and Arkies get a little colorful in the way they describe things.

As we all know there are few if any systems that every detail is chisled in stone.  So, there are options with this system as well.

Let's be patient and we'll see where this takes us.

George

7483 un. up by now George,since have rised my starting unit
from 0,50 to 1.
Haven't mentioned that have lost my initial stop/los BR 9 timesx240 un.
in testing daily these last 4 months,and still above amount in plus.

[albertojonas]

Post an attach just to check it

i play the next crossing even if it does not qualify? when in -minus?example_1

if not, I wait for the next qualifiable trigger then go on with progression...example2

You are wright, the progression seems a bit subjective, and I can not manage to get any rulle to it when things go wrong



cheers

[F_LAT_INO]

Post an attach just to check it

i play the next crossing even if it does not qualify? when in -minus?

cheers

Never play 3 sectors in same column

1,4,7
2,5,8
3,6,9

Benfica winning against Lyon

[GLC]

Post an attach just to check it

i play the next crossing even if it does not qualify? when in -minus?

cheers

Alberto,

Attachment looks perfect to me.

FLATINO said that he has been playing with the trigger being a sector in each of the dozens unless the 3 dozens are covered in the same column, then, no bet.

If you are in minus, you decide how far to go back.  Usually you go back 2 steps but you can decide to go a little more or less to suit the situation.

It's kind of like playing other bets, we get in the hole, but we don't want to try to get out all at once or our bets get too big.  We have to climb out step by step.

George