PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

[haloBing]

.


This is how i play the system:

Sectors are A, B or C. Every sector are 6 split numbers (so covering 12 numbers)
A are numbers: 1,4,7,10 - 15,18,21,24 -  26,29,32,35
B are numbers: 2,5,8,11 - 13,16,19,22 -  27,30,33,36
C are numbers: 3,6,9,12 - 14,17,20,23 -  25,28,31,34

Mod8 means another tweak (wait until chops end, for example see numbers below)

Progression:
start with 1 unit on every split (so total 6 units per sector) x 2 sectors = 12 units
if lose +2 units (so total 3*6 = 18 units per sector) x 2 sectors = 36 units)
if win -1 units, except if you are already betting 1 unit.

Method, wait until 2 different sectors appear after another, then bet those 2 sectors. If lose play virtual until you will get 3 sectors with 2 same sectors, see example:

31 - C
20 - C
2   - B (now bet sector B and C +1 unit each split)
9   - C win, play sector B and C +1 unit each split
24 - A lose (now play virtual)
19 - B (last three sectors C,B,A not 2 same sectors so continue virtual)
17 - C (last three sectors A,B,C not 2 same sectors so continue virtual)
32 - A (last three sectors B,C,A not 2 same sectors so continue virtual)
11 - B (last three sectors C,A,B not 2 same sectors so continue virtual)
5   - B (last three sectors A,B,B 2 same sectors so play sectors A and B) play +3 units each split
32 - A win, play +2 units every split, sectors A and B
10 - A win, play +1 units every split, sectors A and B
33 - B win, play +1 units every split, sectors A and B
etc ......

This is how i play the system. You could also cover zero as a full number or as a split with a sector what you don't have to bet on. Lets say you have to bet A and C, so sector B is not covered you can bet zero and number 2 as a split, but that is up to you


peauke

Nice presentation of the method. Perhaps progression should be explained more precisely.

[StackBundles]

i take it this is the correct way to play?



23131122123123212211222133332132313322311223233223
    wwl:lvvvvlv::wlvwwlvvvvlvwlwwlvlwl::


1=a 2=b 3=c


but not to sure on how to do the progression wasnt there a flat bet for this?

[peauke]

average 1 on 6 games lose with a stop-loss off 250 units and win stop of 100 units. So i lose 250 and win 600 units on average. I am just starting so i have about 100 games played. 1 or 2 games a day. 1 game is about 40 to 50 spins.

[Juiced91]

Progression:
start with 1 unit on every split (so total 6 units)
if lose +2 units (so total 3*6 = 18 units)
if win -1 units, except if you are already betting 1 unit.

Simple really

[StackBundles]

start with 1 unit on every split (so total 6 units)[/size]if lose +2 units (so total 3*6 = 18 units)if win -1 units, except if you are already betting 1 unit.




yeh it is simple really expect if you lose and bet 2 units on each that doesnt add up to 18 it equal 24 or am i being thick and got this all wrong?

[Robeenhuut]

average 1 on 6 games lose with a stop-loss off 250 units and win stop of 100 units. So i lose 250 and win 600 units on average. I am just starting so i have about 100 games played. 1 or 2 games a day. 1 game is about 40 to 50 spins.

Nice ratio. Hope you will keep it up 

[peauke]

Progression:
start with 1 unit on every split (so total 6 units)
if lose +2 units (so total 3*6 = 18 units)
if win -1 units, except if you are already betting 1 unit.

Simple really

Maybe i wasn' t totaly clear.
you bet per sector 6 units so in total 12 units (you always bet 2 sectors). If you lose +2, so 3 units per split ( 2 sectors are 12 splits) so totaly 3*12=36 units total.

I hope it is clear now

[StackBundles]

would this not be better if we doubled up on our wins for say 2 or 3 wins in a row then drop back to 1
as you get far more W's in a row than L's

[Paja]

It's all about playing engineered dozens. I like to call them CROZENS, crossing dozens or Croatian dozens. They are wheel based so forget about RNG.


ABC registry should give us edge compared to regular dozens so it's all about converting spins to ABC format and proper analysis which i'm doing at the moment.


LD is not only move when betting 2 dozens so we could maybe take advantage when chops are hitting. I believe it could be winner even flatbetting.

[peauke]

i take it this is the correct way to play?



23131122123123212211222133332132313322311223233223
    wwl:lvvvvlv::wlvwwlvvvvlvwlwwlvlwl::


1=a 2=b 3=c


but not to sure on how to do the progression wasn't there a flat bet for this?

I would play your result the following:

2         0   0
3         0   0
1   l   -1   -12   -12
3   v      0   -12
1   w   3   18   6
1   w   2   12   18
2   l   -1   -12   6
2   v      0   6
1   w   3   18   24
2   w   2   12   36
3   l   -1   -12   24
1   v      0   24
2   v      0   24
3   v      0   24
2   v      0   24
1   l   -3   -36   -12
2   v      0   -12
2   w   5   30   18
1   w   4   24   42
1   w   3   18   60
2   w   2   12   72
2   w   1   6   78
2   w   1   6   84
1   w   1   6   90
3   l   -1   -12   78
3   v      0   78
3   w   3   18   96
3   w   2   12   108
2   l   -1   -12   96
1   v      0   96
3   v      0   96
2   v      0   96
3   v      0   96
1   l   -3   -36   60
3   v      0   60
3   w   5   30   90
2   l   -4   -48   42
2   v      0   42
3   w   6   36   78
1   l   -5   -60   18
1   v      0   18
2   l   -7   -84   -66
2   v      0   -66
3   l   -9   -108   -174
2   v      0   -174
3   w   11   66   -108
3   w   10   60   -48
2   w   9   54   6
2   w   8   48   54
3   w   7   42   96

so high win was 108 units, biggest drawdown was 174 units ending with 96 units.

[vile]

I would play your result the following:

2         0   0
3         0   0
1   l   -1   -12   -12
3   v      0   -12
1   w   3   18   6
1   w   2   12   18
2   l   -1   -12   6
2   v      0   6no virt. here,as you have above 1,1,2
1   w   3   18   24
2   w   2   12   36
3   l   -1   -12   24
1   v      0   24
2   v      0   24
3   v      0   24
2   v      0   24
1   l   -3   -36   -12
2   v      0   -12
2   w   5   30   18
1   w   4   24   42
1   w   3   18   60
2   w   2   12   72
2   w   1   6   78
2   w   1   6   84
1   w   1   6   90
3   l   -1   -12   78
3   v      0   78
3   w   3   18   96
3   w   2   12   108
2   l   -1   -12   96
1   v      0   96
3   v      0   96
2   v      0   96
3   v      0   96
1   l   -3   -36   60
3   v      0   60
3   w   5   30   90
2   l   -4   -48   42
2   v      0   42same here no virtual
3   w   6   36   78
1   l   -5   -60   18
1   v      0   18
2   l   -7   -84   -66
2   v      0   -66
3   l   -9   -108   -174
2   v      0   -174-same here no virtual
3   w   11   66   -108
3   w   10   60   -48
2   w   9   54   6
2   w   8   48   54
3   w   7   42   96

so high win was 108 units, biggest drawdown was 174 units ending with 96 units.

Inother words you would have better results

[peauke]

Thanks Vile for the correction. I was playing it wrong or you could say not optimal.

I will check my spins if it makes a huge difference

peauke

[rossco]

After >300 spins have had wins,no losses with this method playing it the following way.

Trigger to bet, when one group, say A, has shown 3 times in a row,bet B and C. If lose, bet again, using progression 3 times the original bet, and this time covering zero.

Another trigger to bet, when one group, say A , has shown 3 times out of 4, e.g. AABA or ABAA, Bet B and C. If lose, bet again, using progression 3 times the original bet.

Try this without risking money. So far, so good for me. rossco.

[warrior]

After >300 spins have had wins,no losses with this method playing it the following way.

Trigger to bet, when one group, say A, has shown 3 times in a row,bet B and C. If lose, bet again, using progression 3 times the original bet, and this time covering zero.

Another trigger to bet, when one group, say A , has shown 3 times out of 4, e.g. AABA or ABAA, Bet B and C. If lose, bet again, using progression 3 times the original bet.

Try this without risking money. So far, so good for me. rossco.

keep testing.

[Oudi]

Hey there,

does anybody winning in long term (with live dealer) in online casino using this system?

Im testing (only) 100 spins - positive results.

What about you guys?

Thanks, Oudi