CODE 4

[Anthony]

Lets hope that's the case.

[Robeenhuut]

       



          Or there busy WINNING .

Vanity always prevails 

Regards

[rossco]

Can anyone suggest a suitable progression to play CODE 4 at a casino where the minimum bet on Dozens is 2 units (by playing 2 double streets at 1 unit each), and the minimum bet on Columns is 5 units. I am wishing to minimize loss in that event. Ross.

[amk]

Hello Rossco,

You can play a 1/3/9/27 progression on four double streets. This calculation was possible due to Madmax's progression calculator. I am very bad with math and would have most likely never have figured this out without it's help as it takes a lot of math

Apply JohnLegend's playing method of just 1 session of 2 games back to back. No more then 5 times per day.

Much success Rossco.

[chewenhua]

hi everyone & merry christmas to all from Singapore

i new here and its my first post! have been reading extensively this thread recently and many thanks to u amk and also to JL for your super code4 methods and also contributions!

just wondering if anyone has any success with the Code4 ECs, as mostly the thread talks about Code4

no doubt Code 4 has 3x3x3x3 = 81 different combinations w/ a total capital outlay of 80 units. (assuming progression of 1/3/9/27) while Code 4 EC has 2x2x2x2 = 16 combinations (assuming progression of 1/2/4/8 = 15 units)

hmmm would using Code4EC be more practical on the actual tables? also, possible to expand out the Code4EC to maybe Code6ECs with a 2nd level for recovery

just for example using HighLow/OddEven/RedBlack
Code6EC = H/L O/E R/B H/L O/E R/B = 64 combinations (1/2/4/8/16/32 = 63 units)
x
H/L O/E R/B H/L O/E R/B = total of 4096 combinations? anyways, maybe this idea has already been thought about in these forums....just trying to brainstorm and create additional discussion here to a great method of play. Thanks again!! 

[chewenhua]

also i have a question of Code4

in the event of a loss..

1C1A <--- Pattern 1 Trigger
2B3C <--- Pattern 2 Trigger
2A2A <--- Virtual Line

1C1A <--- Bet vs Pattern 1 = Loss (Ouch) 
XXXX <---- Recovery Bet

is my next recovery Bet vs "Pattern 2 Trigger of 2B3C" or vs the pattern that i just made a loss on, which is 1C1A, thanks!@

[chewenhua]

oh yes this is my actual set of results from a autowheel in an online casino. I am using a code 6 betting for it. 3x3x3x3x3x3 = 729 combinations. sorry for the many questions! but im just wondering if there is any difference in practical use of using Code6 vs Code4, although i have a 729 combination advantage.... and still won my bets... i almost 'fell asleep' while waiting for the wheel to spin....for triggers lol, so may not be so practical. also i was really quite amazed to see it a pattern repeat during my session

32 C2A2A1
34 C101A1
20 B3C1C2
2  A3C3A3 +W1
35 C3A3B1
35 C3A2B1 +W1
35 C1B2C3 +W1 
32 C2B2B2 +W2
15 B3B2C1 +W1
27 C3B3B1 +W2
18 B2B2A1 +W1
6  A1C2C0 +W1
21 B3C3A1 +W1
35 C1B2C3 +W1 
33 C1C1C1
13 B2C3C3 +W2
23 B3C3B2 +W1
22 B2A1B2 +W1
1  A3C1B3 +W1
31 C2A1C3 +W1
27 C2B2C3 +W1
8  A2C2C2 +W2
9  A1A3C2 +W1
8  A1C3B2 +W1
16 B1A1B3 +W1

yes i know its against the rule to bet 'continously'

Start of Session : 654 units
End of Session : 674 units
Total Profits : +20 units
Time Taken : 2 hours

W1 : 16
W2 : 4
W3 : 0
W4 : 0
W5 : 0
W6 : 0

Win/Loss Sequence : WWWLWWLWWWWWLWWWWWWLWWWW

I could get wiped out with a Code6 marty progression though if i took a hit, anyways just sharing my results! thanks

[Johnlegend]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/12/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 356/1

BALANCE 3,688 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 1,229

STEP 2 WINS 761

STEP 3 WINS 445

STEP 4 WINS 58----LOSSES 7

AMKS greatest known Method continues to reap the rewards for my persistence. I lost two games in the last 500 played. Its a marvel I will always use.

[Robeenhuut]

RESULTS UPDATE FOR CODE 4 FOR 27/12/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 2,500

TOTAL GAMES WON 2,493

TOTAL GAMES LOST 7

STRIKERATE APPROX 356/1

BALANCE 3,688 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 1,229

STEP 2 WINS 761

STEP 3 WINS 445

STEP 4 WINS 58----LOSSES 7

AMKS greatest known Method continues to reap the rewards for my persistence. I lost two games in the last 500 played. Its a marvel I will always use.

Hello JL

Congrats. Great numbers. It just puzzles me that in step 1 your W/L ratio is around 50%, goes up slightly in step 2 but  you win 9 out of 10 times in 2 last steps betting on 2 DZ or 2 CL. 

Regards

[seykid31]

JL what units are you using.25 units,5 units.

[Johnlegend]

Hello JL

Congrats. Great numbers. It just puzzles me that in step 1 your W/L ratio is around 50%, goes up slightly in step 2 but  you win 9 out of 10 times in 2 last steps betting on 2 DZ or 2 CL. 

Regards

This is correct Robeenhuut, but during the course of playing say 500 games there will be slight shifts in percentage breakdown for the first two steps. I always say there is more to investigate with many of these methods. Sadly we don't have people with the staying power to make that effort. They want everything done for them.

[Johnlegend]

JL what units are you using.25 units,5 units.

I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.

[seykid31]

I risk 160 units total on a game Seykid31 to win 2 units. So I.E
2---2------6---6-----18---18-----54---54 = Total risk 160 units.

In the beginning I experimented with staking. I was thinking of using multiple levels after a loss. But the strikerate is so strong with CODE 4 this wasn't necessary. Like it would be with a fast turnover method like DIVIDE AND CONQUER. That is when clever money management and disciplined play really pay off. And you make much faster progress. Than you would just using one staking level as I do for CODE 4 and VERTICAL 8.

One of the biggest mis-conceptions ingrained in roulette players brains, is this notion that a method MUST turn a profit purely on bet selection to level stakes to be worth a hoot. And this is one of the reasons few get anywhere with this game. The essential elements to a winning method are A, a method with a good strikerate. B, Smart use of Money Management. C, Disciplined Mindset.

To stick to the task, day in and day out. And its the third essential that remains the stumbling block for virtually every player of this game. It took me several years to clinch that resolve and iron will to stay with what works. Most will never have it. They will be system hopping their whole lives through. And never getting anywhere.

Sorry i meant what chip are you using 1 dollar??

[Robeenhuut]

This is correct Robeenhuut, but during the course of playing say 500 games there will be slight shifts in percentage breakdown for the first two steps. I always say there is more to investigate with many of these methods. Sadly we don't have people with the staying power to make that effort. They want everything done for them.

Hello JL

i think that you missed my point. If you played 2500 games then its at least 30000 spins? i just dont see that in independent events which are 4 steps of progression you get such a different results. It seems that the deeper you go into progression your W/L ratio increases. On average it should be around 67% (2/3) but suddenly in 2 last steps you get around 90%. Try to bet against 1 DZ or CL in large number of games and your numbers should be around 67%.  I just dont see how you can get such a large fluctuations.  Only other explanation would be that in the next 2500 games the numbers will gradually even out....

Regards

[amk]

We'll have to wait and see Robeenhuut..............

My feeling tells me all will be well for JL