#1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc

Roulette-focused => Main Roulette Board => Topic started by: ignatus on Feb 16, 03:40 PM 2013

Title: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 03:40 PM 2013
Well, here she is. Mary Jane, the woman I love the most! And I know, lots of people going to make loads of cash with my baby

Hope you like her!
  ;D

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Kingspin on Feb 16, 04:15 PM 2013
Well i won 2000 chips thanks to one of your systems  :thumbsup:    Keep up the good work.. :)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 04:20 PM 2013
Quote from: Kingspin on Feb 16, 04:15 PM 2013
Well i won 2000 chips thanks to one of your systems  :thumbsup:    Keep up the good work.. :)

Thanks.   :)

Well, This was my first session with MaryJane:

LWWWLLLLWWLWLWWLLWLWWWLLWW

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: amk on Feb 16, 05:42 PM 2013
Ignatus,


Thanks and could you post/type or copy past the method into your thread. I can't seem to be able to look at the method in the file.



Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 05:47 PM 2013
Quote from: amk on Feb 16, 05:42 PM 2013
Ignatus,


Thanks and could you post/type or copy past the method into your thread. I can't seem to be able to look at the method in the file.

This for European Live Wheels only. (ofcourse!) Following cw, ccw gives high hitrate, betting 14 number in cw or ccw direction (same as last) at Range 3-16.

This strategy is only based on wheel movements, (frequent patterns) --> cw & ccw Repeats

Flatbetting is the best option playing this
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Smoczoor on Feb 16, 06:22 PM 2013
After day or two you should delete this thread becouse casinos bankrupt soon dear ignatus   8)

Hitrate is awesome on DublinBet... I'm playing now DublinBet WWWWLWWL...
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 16, 06:33 PM 2013
won twice, lost 5 in a row. what do I do now I am down £80?....smoke a load of weed and make a new system up?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 16, 06:53 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 16, 05:47 PM 2013
This for European Live Wheels only. (ofcourse!) Following cw, ccw gives high hitrate, betting 14 number in cw or ccw direction (same as last) at Range 3-16.

This strategy is only based on wheel movements, (frequent patterns) --> cw & ccw Repeats

Flatbetting is the best option playing this


Is the betting point from the last outcome versus the decision before last
(like the number of pockets from the two spins?)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 16, 08:26 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 16, 06:33 PM 2013
won twice, lost 5 in a row. what do I do now I am down £80?....smoke a load of weed and make a new system up?

I hear ya bruv. Usual BS from a guy with no control. I can make any system work with the right conditions, control & most importantly LUCK!!
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Smoczoor on Feb 16, 08:47 PM 2013
More heavy testing is needed. Why? I have very different results from casinos.
Dublinbet - hitrate 45.83%
BetFair - 34.42%

To be in profit hitrate must be above 38,88%

Maybe you found Dublinbet wheel bias?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 16, 09:01 PM 2013
You are welcome to the zoo, but please don’t feed the animals.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 10:16 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 16, 06:33 PM 2013
won twice, lost 5 in a row. what do I do now I am down £80?....smoke a load of weed and make a new system up?

Well, that can happen.  As you can see from my other results. Perhaps I should post that too (if you haven't seen it already?) Use stoploss at 3 losses then,

CCW 5  R 
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 5   R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 8  B  W
CCW 7  R  W
CW  5  B  L
0         L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 5  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 12 B  W
CCW 16 B  W
CCW 10 B  W
CW 7   R  L
CCW 11 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 6   R  W
CCW 9  B  L
CCW 14 B  W
CW 7   0  L
CW 16  B  -
CCW 3  R  L
CW 7   B  L
CCW 9  B  L
CCW 12 R  W
CCW 13 R  W
CW 18  R  L
CCW 4  R  L
CCW 17 B  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 1   R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CCW 11 0  W
CCW 14 R  -
CW 5   B  L
CCW 13 B  L
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 15 B  W
CCW 2  0  L
CW 1   R  -
CW 10  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 6  R  L
CCW 14 R  W
CCW 18    L
CCW 5  B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CW 13  B  L
CCW 15 R  L
CW 8   R  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 15  B  L
CW 2   B  L
CW 9   R  W
CW 13  R  W
CW 17  B  L
CW 4   B  W
CW 18  R  L
CW 12  R  W
CCW 14 R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CW 17  B  L
CW 14  B  W
CCW 7  R  L
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 7  R  W
CCW 12 B  W
CW 16  R  L
CW 12  R  W
CW 5   B  W
CW 16  R  W
CCW 11 R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 12  B  L
CCW 13 B  L
CW 15  B  L
CCW 16 R  L
CCW 10 R  W
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 15 0  W
CCW 12 R  W
CCW 12 B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 12  B  W
CCW 15 B  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 11  B  W
CW 7   R  W
CW 10  R  W
CW 4   R  W
CW 4   R  W
CW 14  R  W
CW 11  R  W
CW 2   R  L
CW 5   B  W
CCW 15 R  L
CCW 13 R  W
CW 11  R  L
CW 13  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 17 0  L
CCW 16 R  W
CW 7   B  L
CW 9   0  W
CCW 2  R  -
CCW 17 B  L
CW 16  B  L
CCW 4  B  L
cw 8   R  L 
CW 13  B  W
CCW 1  B  L
CW 19  B  L
CW 15  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 15 R  L
CW 5   B  L
CCW 16 B  L
CW 13  R  L
CW 13  R  W
CCW 8  R  L
CCW 11 R  W
CCW 11 B  W
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CW 9   R  L
CW 10  R  W

CW 1   B
CW 12  B  W
CCW 18 R  L
CW 8   R  L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 6  R  W
CW 9   B  L
CCW 11 R  L
CCW 14 B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 7   B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 1   B  L
CW 10  B  W
CCW 13 R  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 12  B  W
CW 7   R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 7   B  W
CW 8   B  W
CW 16  R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 10 B  W
CCW 17 B  L
CCW 15 B  W
CW 3   R  L
CCW 15 B  L
CCW 15 R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 12  B  W
CW 17  R  L
CCW 5  B  L
CW 8   B  L
CW 15  B  W
CCW 10 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 8   R  W

CW 3   R  L
CCW 13 B  L
CCW 15 B  W
CW 3   R  L
CW 14  R  W
CCW 18 R  L
CW 17  B  L
CCW 3  R  L
CW 18  R  L
CW 18  B  L
CCW 10 B  L
CW 5   R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CW 11  B  L
CCW 8  0  L
CW 8   B  -
0         L
CW 13  R  L
CW 10  R  W
CW 2   R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 3  B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CCW 11 R  W
CW 3   B  L
CW 16  R  W
CW 8   R  W
CW 16  R  W
CW 12  R  W
CW 17  R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 5  B  W
CW 2   B  L
CCW 7  B  L
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 1  R  L
CCW 15 B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 1   B  L
CCW 11 B  L
CCW 15 R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 5   R  W
CCW 9  B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 16  0  W
0      0  -
CCW 14 R  -
CCW 6  R  W
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 3  B  W
CCW 2  B  L
CW 3   R  L
CW 5   R  W
0      R  L
CW 8   R  L
CW 8   R  W
CCW 14 R  L
CW 12  R  L
CW 2   R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CCW 2  R  L
CW 13  B  L
CCW 5  R  L
CCW 9  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 11 R  W
CCW 6  R  W
CCW 14 R  W
CCW 3  R  W
CCW 13 B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CCW 5  B  W
CW 10  B  L
0      B  L
CCW 9  R  L
CW 3   B  L
CW 8   B  W
CW 11  R  W
CW 12  B  W
CW 8   B  W
CW 1   R  L
CCW 11 B  L
CCW 9  B  W
CW 16  R  L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 14 B  W

0   ccw 6 0   
6   ccw 10 B  W
33  cw 12 B   L
8   ccw 6 B   L
32  ccw 15 R  W
19  cw 2 R    L   
11  cw 11 B   W 
22  cw 14 B   W
30  ccw 13 R  L
34  ccw 6 R   W
2   ccw 3 B   W
34  ccw 3 R   W
12  ccw 13 R  W
36  cw 17 R   L
25  cw 6 R    W
1   cw 16 R   W
18  cw 6 R    W
14  ccw 4 R   L
36  ccw 12 R  W
20  ccw 11 B  W
35  cw 10 B   L
22  ccw 6 B   L
35  cw 6 B    L
1   ccw 11 R  L
8   ccw 7 B   W
33  cw 6 B    L
7   cw 9 R    W
26  cw 5 B    W
14  ccw 11 R  L
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 10:28 PM 2013
Quote from: Proofreaders2000 on Feb 16, 06:53 PM 2013

Is the betting point from the last outcome versus the decision before last
(like the number of pockets from the two spins?)

Yes? ofc it's betting from last outcome (two last spins determine direction)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 10:31 PM 2013
Quote from: Smoczoor on Feb 16, 08:47 PM 2013
More heavy testing is needed. Why? I have very different results from casinos.
Dublinbet - hitrate 45.83%
BetFair - 34.42%

To be in profit hitrate must be above 38,88%

Maybe you found Dublinbet wheel bias?

Use stoploss. This will decrease losing streaks.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: TwoCatSam on Feb 16, 10:51 PM 2013
Terrible loss at Dublin.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 10:58 PM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Feb 16, 10:51 PM 2013
Terrible loss at Dublin.

Well? You got the results; It has good hitrate, but loss can happen. You've got the advice to use stoploss. That's the best I can do for now.

Since this strategy is betting for cw & cww patterns (repeats) it will not always happen. Compare this to RBRBRB RRRRR BBBBB cw & cww patterns (repeats) will form like RRRRR or BBBBB, but not always. Sometime a RBRBRB pattern comes. Same thing. But then cw & cww repeats are more common than R/B-repeats

In the long run it will last hopefully (longer sessions)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 16, 11:02 PM 2013
This is a big bag of kief, mostly leaf, stalks, and seeds.

I'll wait for the buds, thanks.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 16, 11:14 PM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 16, 11:02 PM 2013
This is a big bag of kief, mostly leaf, stalks, and seeds.

I'll wait for the buds, thanks.

This is good shit! Best quality stuff!  ;D
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 01:09 AM 2013
Second session (Live at DB)

WLWWLLLWLLLLLLLLWLWLLWLWLWWLLWLWWLLWLLLLLLLWLLLLLWWWLLWWWLLLW

61 games played 61*14= 854
22 games won 22*36= 792

Total= -62 (no stoploss)

42 games played= 588
18 games won= 648

Total= +60 (with stoploss at 3 losses in a row & wait for virtual win)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 02:13 AM 2013
*correction*

41 games played=41*14= 574
17 games won=17*36= 612

Total= +38 (with stoploss)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 04:26 AM 2013
Mary Jane needs a sister or a man who can talk some sense into her!

She should look for the first 2 to 4 spins from the dealer CCW & CW and then work out her average spin distance before going into action. make this Dynamic so that every spin is calculated and spin distance averages are constantly updated.

Right now Playing Mary Jane is like a hoar puling her knickers up and down!

I have better results using any 14 number sector bet generated from an RNG. Maybe Mary might do better on Airball where the spin distances seem to be more stable. I'll give it a go today and let you know.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 04:57 AM 2013
Quote from: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 04:26 AM 2013
Mary Jane needs a sister or a man who can talk some sense into her!

She should look for the first 2 to 4 spins from the dealer CCW & CW and then work out her average spin distance before going into action. make this Dynamic so that every spin is calculated and spin distance averages are constantly updated.

Right now Playing Mary Jane is like a hoar puling her knickers up and down!

I have better results using any 14 number sector bet generated from an RNG. Maybe Mary might do better on Airball where the spin distances seem to be more stable. I'll give it a go today and let you know.

Alright  :)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 17, 05:52 AM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 16, 09:01 PM 2013
You are welcome to the zoo, but please don’t feed the animals.
Can i poke them with a stick?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 06:30 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 17, 04:57 AM 2013
Alright  :)

New challenge for you Ignatus. If you can programme the tracker then Mary Jane will ROCK HER TITS OFF!  :girl_to:
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 06:57 AM 2013
Quote from: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 06:30 AM 2013
New challenge for you Ignatus. If you can programme the tracker then Mary Jane will ROCK HER TITS OFF!  :girl_to:

Well, yes? A dynamic tracker is too complicated for me. I'll leave that to better coders. I'm not sure that would increase hitrate? Perhaps,... but I don't think the difference will be great? Focus on a certan range lesser numbers, lesser hitrate.

How was your result
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Drazen on Feb 17, 06:58 AM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 16, 09:01 PM 2013
You are welcome to the zoo, but please don’t feed the animals.

Drazen: Did I ever tell you about the time I came face to face with a very fierce gorilla?
Skakus: No, what happened?
Drazen: Well, I stood there, without a gun . . . The gorilla looked at me and snarled and roared and beat his chest. Then it came closer and closer . . .
Skakus: What did you do?
Drazen: Oh, Id had enough, so I moved on to the next cage.
     
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 07:22 AM 2013
<3
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 17, 07:39 AM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 17, 05:52 AM 2013
Can i poke them with a stick?

You do have a mean streak, don't you Turner!  :twisted:


Quote from: Drazen on Feb 17, 06:58 AM 2013
Drazen: Did I ever tell you about the time I came face to face with a very fierce gorilla?
Skakus: No, what happened?
Drazen: Well, I stood there, without a gun . . . The gorilla looked at me and snarled and roared and beat his chest. Then it came closer and closer . . .
Skakus: What did you do?
Drazen: Oh, Id had enough, so I moved on to the next cage.

;D ;D ;D  classic!  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 08:43 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 17, 06:57 AM 2013
Well, yes? A dynamic tracker is too complicated for me. I'll leave that to better coders. I'm not sure that would increase hitrate? Perhaps,... but I don't think the difference will be great? Focus on a certain range lesser numbers, lesser hitrate.

How was your result


LIVE DEALER
1. WLWLLLWWLLLLLLWLLWLWLLLWWWWWWW = +8.4u
2. LLWLWLWWWLWWWWWLLLLLW = +10.2u

AIR BALL
1. WLWWWLLLWLWWLLWLWLLLWLWWWLLLWLLLLW = +6.4u
2. WWWLWLWLLWWLLLLWLLLWLLWWLWW = +9u

2hrs = +34u

So far so good. Seems to be a nice follow on from the 123 move which I had good success with mainly due to managing my BR. 

I hate progression so as a nice change I use the following....

Based on the 14 number bet and my BR I can afford 50c flat bet per number. Instead of sticking all the 50c on, I put 10c on each. After a loss I can go to 20c then 30c etc up to my flat bet of 50c. As you can see this is not a normal progression but one that starts off in a negative way based on what your 'normal' minimum flat bet unit is for each number.

Maybe you are right and a more dynamic selection might not make much difference but it would be nice to try. So let's throw out the challenge to anyone and see if a tracker could be made to do this. Unfortunately my experience in programing or excel are limited otherwise I would of given it a go.

Good job on the tracker  :thumbsup:

Hope that this time you don't spunk away your bankroll  :embarrassed:
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 09:07 AM 2013
Quote from: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 08:43 AM 2013
LIVE DEALER
1. WLWLLLWWLLLLLLWLLWLWLLLWWWWWWW = +8.4u
2. LLWLWLWWWLWWWWWLLLLLW = +10.2u

AIR BALL
1. WLWWWLLLWLWWLLWLWLLLWLWWWLLLWLLLLW = +6.4u
2. WWWLWLWLLWWLLLLWLLLWLLWWLWW = +9u

2hrs = +34u

So far so good. Seems to be a nice follow on from the 123 move which I had good success with mainly due to managing my BR. 

I hate progression so as a nice change I use the following....

Based on the 14 number bet and my BR I can afford 50c flat bet per number. Instead of sticking all the 50c on, I put 10c on each. After a loss I can go to 20c then 30c etc up to my flat bet of 50c. As you can see this is not a normal progression but one that starts off in a negative way based on what your 'normal' minimum flat bet unit is for each number.

Maybe you are right and a more dynamic selection might not make much difference but it would be nice to try. So let's throw out the challenge to anyone and see if a tracker could be made to do this. Unfortunately my experience in programing or excel are limited otherwise I would of given it a go.

Good job on the tracker  :thumbsup:

Hope that this time you don't spunk away your bankroll  :embarrassed:

Thanks, it was this kind of result I was waiting for. I *knew* it would work before I made it. What's great about it, it's only focused on the WHEEL movements. That means: if it works, only a change in law of physics can change the results. (And that won't happen anytime soon!) 

Cheers  8)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 09:57 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 17, 09:07 AM 2013
Thanks, it was this kind of result I was waiting for. I *knew* it would work before I made it. What's great about it, it's only focused on the WHEEL movements. That means: if it works, only a change in law of physics can change the results. (And that won't happen anytime soon!) 

Cheers  8)

Let's hope so man!
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: TwoCatSam on Feb 17, 10:23 AM 2013
The wheelmov3 is where you should be looking. 

You had a good idea.  Why is it in the trash can?

I played Dublin and got a string of Ls you wouldn't believe.  Pausing would not have helped as they just kept coming.

Now this is the RFH, but it's ALWAYS out here just around the corner.  How do you deal with it?

Sam
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 01:30 PM 2013
Quote from: TwoCatSam on Feb 17, 10:23 AM 2013
The wheelmov3 is where you should be looking. 

You had a good idea.  Why is it in the trash can?

I played Dublin and got a string of Ls you wouldn't believe.  Pausing would not have helped as they just kept coming.

Now this is the RFH, but it's ALWAYS out here just around the corner.  How do you deal with it?

Sam

Try it again on Airball Sam
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 04:39 PM 2013
Losses in a row before a win after 233 spins...

1 = 29
2 = 18
3 = 12
4 = 4
5 = 1
6 = 1
7 = 1

133 Wins
136 Losses

Results so far
233 spins (5.5hrs)
$102.20 ($18.58 per hr)

Not to shabby so far. That money is now banked and will start a new session with $20. Now let's see what the longer term brings
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: TwoCatSam on Feb 17, 04:54 PM 2013
Duff

Can't do air ball.  Only have Dublin access.

Sam
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: amk on Feb 17, 05:14 PM 2013
You can play Dublin live Sam?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 05:16 PM 2013
Ah that's tough Sam. I play EuroGrand I guess you can't play there?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: weddings on Feb 17, 05:41 PM 2013
Quote from: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 04:39 PM 2013
Losses in a row before a win after 233 spins...

1 = 29
2 = 18
3 = 12
4 = 4
5 = 1
6 = 1
7 = 1

133 Wins
136 Losses

Results so far
233 spins (5.5hrs)
$102.20 ($18.58 per hr)

Not to shabby so far. That money is now banked and will start a new session with $20. Now let's see what the longer term brings


flat bet or with progression?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 07:07 PM 2013
Third session (Live at DB)

WWLWWWWWLLWLLLLLWWLLLWLLLLLLWLLWLLWLLWWWWWWWLW

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: weddings on Feb 17, 07:15 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 17, 07:07 PM 2013
Third session (Live at DB)

WWLWWWWWLLWLLLLLWWLLLWLLLLLLWLLWLLWLLWWWWWWWLW


It's weird. Why is it that you are doing so well and sam is having a terrible session. And both of you are using dublinbet.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 17, 07:24 PM 2013
Quote from: weddings on Feb 17, 07:15 PM 2013

It's weird. Why is it that you are doing so well and sam is having a terrible session. And both of you are using dublinbet.

I don't know? Don't think he has tested it enough. "A terrible loss" Right? That won't happen if you play with stoploss etc.

Anyway, I would be greatful if you all could share some results playing
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 17, 11:51 PM 2013
Quote from: weddings on Feb 17, 05:41 PM 2013

flat bet or with progression?

These results were obtained from flat betting with 10c per number.

I don't like progression but If this keeps going well I would do the folowing....

Based on the 14 number bet and my BR I can afford 50c flat bet per number. Instead of sticking all the 50c on, I put 10c on each. After a loss I can go to 20c then 30c etc up to my flat bet of 50c. As you can see this is not a normal progression but one that starts off in a negative way based on what your 'normal' minimum flat bet unit is for each number.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 06:02 AM 2013
Well, the responses are not so great? Why? Over 100 ppl have the tracker, if you use it can you please share your results?.. I'll play for real next week. OK
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ddarko on Feb 18, 07:45 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 17, 07:24 PM 2013
I don't know? Don't think he has tested it enough.

how many spins have you tested it for please ?

O0
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 18, 08:23 AM 2013
Quote from: ddarko on Feb 18, 07:45 AM 2013
how many spins have you tested it for please ?

O0
How many cones have you punched, please?


(link:://i499.photobucket.com/albums/rr351/skakus/conepunchF_zps1c94be83.jpg)   :xd:
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 10:34 AM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 18, 08:23 AM 2013
How many cones have you punched, please?


(link:://i499.photobucket.com/albums/rr351/skakus/conepunchF_zps1c94be83.jpg)   :xd:

Snoop Dogg - Drop It Like It's Hot ft. Pharrell Williams (link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=GtUVQei3nX4#ws)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Kingspin on Feb 18, 12:07 PM 2013
 I tried this tracker but didn't seem to get anywhere with it , i t's too many numbers on the inside for my liking.
I could see my  bank roll shrinking too much for my liking with this bet .   Long sessions to recover too i found.
7 out of ten for this one 8) .
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 12:14 PM 2013
Quote from: Kingspin on Feb 18, 12:07 PM 2013
I tried this tracker but didn't seem to get anywhere with it , i t's too many numbers on the inside for my liking.
I could see my  bankroll shrinking too much for my liking with this bet .   Long sessions to recover too i found.
7 out of ten for this one 8) .

+896u was the total win from all these session Flatbet (playing with 14 numbers)

CCW 5  R 
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 5   R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 8  B  W
CCW 7  R  W
CW  5  B  L
0         L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 5  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 12 B  W
CCW 16 B  W
CCW 10 B  W
CW 7   R  L
CCW 11 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 6   R  W
CCW 9  B  L
CCW 14 B  W
CW 7   0  L
CW 16  B  -
CCW 3  R  L
CW 7   B  L
CCW 9  B  L
CCW 12 R  W
CCW 13 R  W
CW 18  R  L
CCW 4  R  L
CCW 17 B  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 1   R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CCW 11 0  W
CCW 14 R  -
CW 5   B  L
CCW 13 B  L
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 15 B  W
CCW 2  0  L
CW 1   R  -
CW 10  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 6  R  L
CCW 14 R  W
CCW 18    L
CCW 5  B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CW 13  B  L
CCW 15 R  L
CW 8   R  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 15  B  L
CW 2   B  L
CW 9   R  W
CW 13  R  W
CW 17  B  L
CW 4   B  W
CW 18  R  L
CW 12  R  W
CCW 14 R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CW 17  B  L
CW 14  B  W
CCW 7  R  L
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 7  R  W
CCW 12 B  W
CW 16  R  L
CW 12  R  W
CW 5   B  W
CW 16  R  W
CCW 11 R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 12  B  L
CCW 13 B  L
CW 15  B  L
CCW 16 R  L
CCW 10 R  W
CCW 8  R  W
CCW 15 0  W
CCW 12 R  W
CCW 12 B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 12  B  W
CCW 15 B  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 11  B  W
CW 7   R  W
CW 10  R  W
CW 4   R  W
CW 4   R  W
CW 14  R  W
CW 11  R  W
CW 2   R  L
CW 5   B  W
CCW 15 R  L
CCW 13 R  W
CW 11  R  L
CW 13  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 17 0  L
CCW 16 R  W
CW 7   B  L
CW 9   0  W
CCW 2  R  -
CCW 17 B  L
CW 16  B  L
CCW 4  B  L
cw 8   R  L 
CW 13  B  W
CCW 1  B  L
CW 19  B  L
CW 15  R  W
CW 14  R  W
CCW 15 R  L
CW 5   B  L
CCW 16 B  L
CW 13  R  L
CW 13  R  W
CCW 8  R  L
CCW 11 R  W
CCW 11 B  W
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CW 9   R  L
CW 10  R  W

CW 1   B
CW 12  B  W
CCW 18 R  L
CW 8   R  L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 6  R  W
CW 9   B  L
CCW 11 R  L
CCW 14 B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 7   B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CW 1   B  L
CW 10  B  W
CCW 13 R  L
CW 10  B  L
CW 12  B  W
CW 7   R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 7   B  W
CW 8   B  W
CW 16  R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 10 B  W
CCW 17 B  L
CCW 15 B  W
CW 3   R  L
CCW 15 B  L
CCW 15 R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 12  B  W
CW 17  R  L
CCW 5  B  L
CW 8   B  L
CW 15  B  W
CCW 10 B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 8   R  W

CW 3   R  L
CCW 13 B  L
CCW 15 B  W
CW 3   R  L
CW 14  R  W
CCW 18 R  L
CW 17  B  L
CCW 3  R  L
CW 18  R  L
CW 18  B  L
CCW 10 B  L
CW 5   R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CW 11  B  L
CCW 8  0  L
CW 8   B  -
0         L
CW 13  R  L
CW 10  R  W
CW 2   R  L
CCW 2  R  L
CCW 16 R  W
CCW 3  B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CCW 11 R  W
CW 3   B  L
CW 16  R  W
CW 8   R  W
CW 16  R  W
CW 12  R  W
CW 17  R  L
CCW 12 B  L
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 5  B  W
CW 2   B  L
CCW 7  B  L
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 1  R  L
CCW 15 B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CW 1   B  L
CCW 11 B  L
CCW 15 R  W
CW 1   B  L
CW 5   R  W
CCW 9  B  L
CW 11  R  L
CW 16  0  W
0      0  -
CCW 14 R  -
CCW 6  R  W
CCW 18 R  L
CCW 3  B  W
CCW 2  B  L
CW 3   R  L
CW 5   R  W
0      R  L
CW 8   R  L
CW 8   R  W
CCW 14 R  L
CW 12  R  L
CW 2   R  L
CCW 18 B  L
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 6  B  W
CCW 9  R  W
CCW 2  R  L
CW 13  B  L
CCW 5  R  L
CCW 9  B  W
CCW 4  B  W
CCW 11 R  W
CCW 6  R  W
CCW 14 R  W
CCW 3  R  W
CCW 13 B  W
CCW 5  R  W
CCW 5  B  W
CW 10  B  L
0      B  L
CCW 9  R  L
CW 3   B  L
CW 8   B  W
CW 11  R  W
CW 12  B  W
CW 8   B  W
CW 1   R  L
CCW 11 B  L
CCW 9  B  W
CW 16  R  L
CCW 16 B  L
CCW 14 B  W

0   ccw 6 0   
6   ccw 10 B  W
33  cw 12 B   L
8   ccw 6 B   L
32  ccw 15 R  W
19  cw 2 R    L   
11  cw 11 B   W 
22  cw 14 B   W
30  ccw 13 R  L
34  ccw 6 R   W
2   ccw 3 B   W
34  ccw 3 R   W
12  ccw 13 R  W
36  cw 17 R   L
25  cw 6 R    W
1   cw 16 R   W
18  cw 6 R    W
14  ccw 4 R   L
36  ccw 12 R  W
20  ccw 11 B  W
35  cw 10 B   L
22  ccw 6 B   L
35  cw 6 B    L
1   ccw 11 R  L
8   ccw 7 B   W
33  cw 6 B    L
7   cw 9 R    W
26  cw 5 B    W
14  ccw 11 R  L
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ddarko on Feb 18, 12:55 PM 2013
I will try again!!!!

Quote from: ignatus on Yesterday at 02:24:31 PM

    I don't know? Don't think he has tested it enough.


how many spins have you tested it for please ?

O0
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 01:37 PM 2013
Everything posted so far, and more
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Kingspin on Feb 18, 01:41 PM 2013
I will try some more games later and see how it goes. 
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 01:56 PM 2013
Quote from: Kingspin on Feb 18, 01:41 PM 2013
I will try some more games later and see how it goes.

Alright
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ddarko on Feb 18, 02:01 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 01:37 PM 2013
Everything posted so far, and more

Really that's your reply ?

Not exactly detailed was it. Ok, I will leave you to waste other peoples time instead of mine.


BTW good luck with your next HG

O0
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 03:11 PM 2013
Quote from: ddarko on Feb 18, 02:01 PM 2013
Really that's your reply ?

Not exactly detailed was it. Ok, I will leave you to waste other peoples time instead of mine.


by the way good luck with your next holy grail

O0
You should be banned for this. It's not OK. I have reported to moderators
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 18, 04:02 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 03:11 PM 2013
You should be banned for this. It's not OK. I have reported to moderators

bad trip ignatus?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 04:11 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 18, 04:02 PM 2013
bad trip ignatus?

No, I just don't accept that kind of behavior.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:21 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 03:11 PM 2013
I have reported to moderators

I just wonder have you reported your bufoonery with drog and spaming forum with indecently things for roulette forum here too?
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 04:28 PM 2013
people, cool down. Let's be more friendly and less sensitive and come back to the subject of roulette. Thanx
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 18, 04:30 PM 2013
Quote from: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:21 PM 2013
I just wonder have you reported your bufoonery with drog and spaming forum with indecently things for roulette forum here too?

Drazen...its our fault for keep replying really.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: jarabo002 on Feb 18, 04:32 PM 2013
Thanks Ignatus

Your avatar remembers too much to Tino Casal (RIP)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:39 PM 2013
Yes Turner, I agree.

Trolls are live becasue they are fed.

I now already got used to this fellow and his way of doing things, but he has got too much freedom and his cheekiness overstepped the bounds of good taste and now what he posts is against forums rules and totaly inappropriate. (half naked women, drogs etc..)

He posts whatever he wants wherever he wants...
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 18, 04:43 PM 2013
Quote from: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:39 PM 2013
Yes Turner, I agree.

Trolls are live becasue the are fed.

I now already got used to this fellow and his way of doing things, but he has got too much freedom and his cheekiness overstepped the bounds of good taste and now what he posts is against forums rules and totaly inappropriate.

He posts whatever he wants wherever he wants...

And still he posts with no warning, and Ddarko will probably get a ban...lol
It mirrors life dear Drazen....it mirrors life!
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 04:45 PM 2013
if i see something REAL against rules i react, but i so far i have not. I cant react to different points of views. Sorry.
i am a mod, not a weatherc***
:)

so cool down guys and take it easy
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:47 PM 2013
 Ah, yes there is no anything from saying some things, because they can't be changed, and it is best to ignore them, especialy when you shouldnt and actualy don't give a darn for it  :girl_to:


I uderstand sometimes some things just must look protocol well, although their true functionality is total...  :-X   and even if they are far away from something normal and reasonable, you have to stand them because upper institutions consider it  just protocol well.

The problem with any democratic system anywhere is that fools voice and voice of the smartest, most educated man are taken as same value when those voices are raised.

One just must deal with it.

Best

Drazen
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 04:50 PM 2013
Ddarko did not insult anyone as well. Wasting time is not insult. It's a point of view. Actually for my self i do agree with him, but coming to that, i have not been learning from this forum much for quite a long time (with very few exceptions).

So take it easy guys. Anyone has a freedom to say something about things he does not agree with as long as these are not personal insults. I think that's clear. Don't call each other names or do similar things, don't intrigue against each other, and u r OK.

let's get along.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 04:52 PM 2013
Quote from: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:21 PM 2013
I just wonder have you reported your bufoonery with drog and spaming forum with indecently things for roulette forum here too?

What's wrong with weed and women? Hey? You got much to learn Drazen!  ;D

Joking aside, that was an attack against me, he has no right to do that. Why? It's not me who got a problem. He has.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 04:53 PM 2013
Guys i see what i see. I see a guy who is inventing many different methods to beat roulette, and i see some others who think that all he invents is b/s. Both parts are here not for some bad purpose i guess. Though they irritate each others. What can u do about it...All i can do is say: let's live in peace like good friends and buddies. There should not be any antagonism here.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 04:55 PM 2013
just sit back and relax
Paul McCartney - Once Upon A Long Ago (link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=lZpEwka5ei4#)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:58 PM 2013
Nothing but this is not teenage forum dear Ignatus...

Hm but you apparently found holy grail, so who will resent you for your age behaving like this. Gimme drogs and women!

I have the money I want the status!  ;)

Take care

Drazen
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 05:00 PM 2013
link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=3jlXnQEgbuw (link:://youtu.be/3jlXnQEgbuw)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:04 PM 2013
Quote from: Drazen on Feb 18, 04:58 PM 2013
Nothing but this is not teenage forum dear Ignatus...

Hm but you apparently found holy grail, so who will resent you for your age behaving like this. Gimme drogs and women!

I have the money I want the status!  ;)

Take care

Drazen

Try to give me more sneaky remarks? Well, no. You can never get too old! Why you believe that? ;D

Chill out


Nice song iggiv!  8)

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 18, 05:08 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 04:52 PM 2013
What's wrong with weed and women?

well one casues brain damage and paranoia, and a life of dependancy and misery, costing more and more as you get more addicted, ending in a life of permanent physical and mental damage.

And weed isnt much good for you either.

Turner
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 18, 05:10 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 18, 05:08 PM 2013
well one casues brain damage and paranoia, and a life of dependancy and misery, costing more and more as you get more addicted, ending in a life of permanent physical and mental damage.

And weed isnt much good for you either.

Turner
PMSL!! HI5!!
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:17 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 18, 05:08 PM 2013
well one casues brain damage and paranoia, and a life of dependancy and misery, costing more and more as you get more addicted, ending in a life of permanent physical and mental damage.

And weed isnt much good for you either.

Turner

This is just bullocks and propaganda. "what you know", really? That's what they say in the media and the news. And you believe that? "ok"

I'm not going into a debate about cannabis, that belongs somewhere else. But you won't win that argument Turner. Not by facts (it's all lies)

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 18, 05:28 PM 2013
 ::)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Turner on Feb 18, 05:29 PM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:17 PM 2013
This is just bullocks and propaganda. "what you know", really? That's what they say in the media and the news. And you believe that? "ok"

(it's all lies)

No its all true....women do that to you.....although you do need a few brain cells left to have got the joke.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:34 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 18, 05:29 PM 2013
No its all true....women do that to you.....although you do need a few brain cells left to have got the joke.

Well, this is another personal attack, the second one today. Don't wish to get you banned also? If you have no facts to come up Turner with, stop stop lying OK
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 05:36 PM 2013
i used to know a guy who got insomnia  and other bad stuff from smoking too much weed. Don't think it is harmless. No drugs! And smoking tobacco is not good either.

this is a good stuff by the way to read

link:://:.amazon.com/Chain-Chance-Stanislaw-Lem/dp/0810117304 (link:://:.amazon.com/Chain-Chance-Stanislaw-Lem/dp/0810117304)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:43 PM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on Feb 18, 05:36 PM 2013
i used to know a guy who got insomnia  and other bad stuff from smoking too much weed. Don't think it is harmless. No drugs! And smoking tobacco is not good either.

this is a good stuff by the way to read

link:://:.amazon.com/Chain-Chance-Stanislaw-Lem/dp/0810117304 (link:://:.amazon.com/Chain-Chance-Stanislaw-Lem/dp/0810117304)

"A former astronaut turned private detective is dispatched to Naples to discover the pattern in a mysterious series of deaths and disappearances occurring at a seaside spa" ???

What has THIS to do with anything? Seriously were talking about roulette here? Hey remember this guy ignatus roulette system "Mary Jane"? ....
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: iggiv on Feb 18, 05:49 PM 2013
Sorry for off-topic, but we came to subject of weed and stuff. This is your thread, u can remove all the posts u don't like. All i wanted to do is just move the conversation from confrontation to friendly talking....Also i hate drugs of all kind and tobacco smoking as well...
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 05:54 PM 2013
Quote from: iggiv on Feb 18, 05:49 PM 2013
Sorry for off-topic, but we came to subject of weed and stuff. This is your thread, You can remove all the posts u don't like. All i wanted to do is just move the conversation from confrontation to friendly talking....Also i hate drugs of all kind and tobacco smoking as well...

How can you hate it, when you have no idea about it? You can't hate something you don't know.

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 18, 06:23 PM 2013
Quote from: Turner on Feb 18, 04:30 PM 2013
Drazen...its our fault for keep replying really.

I reiterate,

You are welcome to the zoo, but please don't feed the animals...or poke them with a stick.  :twisted:
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 18, 11:58 PM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 18, 06:23 PM 2013

I reiterate,

You are welcome to the zoo, but please don't feed the animals...or poke them with a stick.  :twisted:

Cut the cr*p Skakus.

That doesn't relate to anyone or anything and it makes no sense at all.

Your purpose with this comment is (?)...





Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: marvin on Feb 19, 12:59 AM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 18, 06:23 PM 2013

I reiterate,

You are welcome to the zoo, but please don't feed the animals...or poke them with a stick.  :twisted:

hahaa i like this one
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Skakus on Feb 19, 01:01 AM 2013
Quote from: ignatus on Feb 18, 11:58 PM 2013
Cut the cr*p Skakus.

That doesn't relate to anyone or anything and it makes no sense at all.

Your purpose with this comment is (?)...


What's that?... you want MORE peanuts?  :o
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 19, 02:18 AM 2013
Quote from: Skakus on Feb 19, 01:01 AM 2013

What's that?... you want MORE peanuts?  :o

If you got nothing relevant to say concerning the topic here: stop talking.
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 19, 02:27 AM 2013
...
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: TwoCatSam on Feb 19, 11:31 AM 2013
ignatus

However you take this is up to you........

Your five number idea is pretty good.  Using a progression, one can stay with it a long time and sweat out a win.

Now you say betting 14 numbers increases your hit rate.  Sure it does, but at a greater cost.  24 numbers will increase your hit rate.  30 will increase your hit rate.  It's the cost of hitting that kills you.

I tried this on Dublin and got mostly Ls.  Maybe I got the RFH.

Sam
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 19, 12:52 PM 2013
I would have to agree with Sam on this one. Less numbers and a higher hit rate is what's needed.

On the right track but light up a doobie and go back to the drawing board mate  :)
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: DuffMiver on Feb 20, 12:32 AM 2013
How about tweaking the tracker to show 18 Numbers in order of the wheel (maybe 9 each way of the position) then we can choose how many and which numbers to bet in that range
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Kingspin on Feb 20, 06:00 AM 2013
Never get sucked in to this sort of crap childish  skitting , you guys are supposed to be roulette pro's lol. :love:
To argue is futile it gains nothing.   I personally try to be ignorant it works much better.   >:D

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Ralph on Feb 20, 06:43 AM 2013
We must bet less than half the numbers. As few as possible one to max seven.  Just one number win and the miss cost and the hit return .
less.   Its OK to win 5% of the spins on  straight up. Just count how a bankroll will last if a RFH comes and you cover the table, a progression will be devastating. 

Allready seven numbers with slow prog, needs a hefty bankroll of 20000 units, with betting one number 5000  will do.

If we can not stand a real bad run, the bankroll and the method is worth  less. We can be lucky and win even a lot, using any plan, but it will one day be gone, if we not retire from the game, with the money won by extremely luck.

A bust of a method will happen to all, we must have some left after that.

Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: ignatus on Feb 21, 11:37 AM 2013
A small fix: Only need to enter last spin
Title: Re: Mary Jane
Post by: Rewster88 on Jul 12, 08:09 AM 2016
ignatus, what happend with this one?