More hit & run thoughts

[RouletteGhost]

BTW, you sure sound like a familiar poster I know (been doing this a long time).

Ken

A brand new member that joins and immediately attacks a system and one specific member is always a retread. A long time member using a new username
*cough cough*

Fits all criteria. See grassroots thread

[MrJ]

This is human nature

Many of the strategies i played won EVERY session with a 20% win goal. My quads for example

But ultimately failed because i wanted more

The whole human thing sucks

My biggest drop >> I was up around 8K (it took 11 hours, not sure how many spins)...lost the 8K plus 5K of my own. I stayed away from sharp objects for a week. Point being again, THE LONGER YOU PLAY etc etc etc etc.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

My biggest drop >> I was up around 8K (it took 11 hours, not sure how many spins)...lost the 8K plus 5K of my own. I stayed away from sharp objects for a week. Point being again, THE LONGER YOU PLAY etc etc etc etc.

Ken

We have all been there

[Tacwell]

Okay, lets say you dont have a great method. I like to use grades...we'll say its a C+ method.

In the first 80 spins, I am up. Do I care that I got lucky? Should I give my profit back to the dealer because it was probably only "luck"? Of course not. Do you have to have a method that beats the H.E. after 600 spins BUT it does well under 200 spins? Back to our same issue at hand....if up EARLY (regardless of how/why), the player should quit.

BTW, you sure sound like a familiar poster I know (been doing this a long time).

Ken

If I knew I was using a C+ system, and was up, then yes quitting is an excellent idea. If you've got and A or A+ system, then you expect to be up and continue playing. (I don't have such a system and probably never will).

I can't help sounding like another poster, is he/she possibly from this part of the planet (South Africa)?

[MrJ]

A brand new member that joins and immediately attacks a system and one specific member is always a retread. A long time member using a new username
*cough cough*

Fits all criteria. See grassroots thread

This whole "attack" definition is a bit fuzzy. Do I think he is NEW to roulette boards? No.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

I digress

A new me you will see. No arguments. I will ignore all negativity. And if someone says something cannot work with no test results it will be disregarded.

[Tacwell]

A brand new member that joins and immediately attacks a system and one specific member is always a retread. A long time member using a new username
*cough cough*

Fits all criteria. See grassroots thread

Uh, RG I provided you with test data,  you attacked me because it didn't agree with what you wanted to see.

[RouletteGhost]

Uh, RG I provided you with test data,  you attacked me because it didn't agree with what you wanted to see.

I will not argue

All i will say is this. Why must people make new names and pretend to be new

[Tacwell]

This whole "attack" definition is a bit fuzzy. Do I think he is NEW to roulette boards? No.

Ken

This is in fact my fist roulette board membership. The last forum I was active on was a local sports betting forum and that was a few years ago.

[MrJ]

If I knew I was using a C+ system, and was up, then yes quitting is an excellent idea. If you've got and A or A+ system, then you expect to be up and continue playing. (I don't have such a system and probably never will).

I can't help sounding like another poster, is he/she possibly from this part of the planet (South Africa)?

Yeah, I can bend on that. With a known ....A or A+ (or even A-) method (not system), why leave? Which can start another damn thread (no time for that). Is every method *EXACTLY* the same in regards to end results? Is one method BETTER than another? Geez, my head is spinning now.

This is where I leave you. Packer game is on in 45 minutes and I still have some cooking to do.

Ken

[Tacwell]

I will not argue

All i will say is this. Why must people make new names and pretend to be new

Then neither will I.

But no, Im not someone else, surely the web admin can check my ip address, and screen resolution, and the browser I'm using to very this, if it's that important.

[MrJ]

I digress

A new me you will see. No arguments. I will ignore all negativity. And if someone says something cannot work with no test results it will be disregarded.

Do we need test results for this....my new method (joking)....after a hit (trigger) from 30-36, bet all even numbers except the 2 & 18. Its a sure winner. I dont need test results to know this is a losing method. Not picking on you RG, just sayin.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

Do we need test results for this....my new method (joking)....after a hit (trigger) from 30-36, bet all even numbers except the 2 & 18. Its a sure winner. I dont need test results to know this is a losing method. Not picking on you RG, just sayin.

Ken

[Tacwell]

Yeah, I can bend on that. With a known ....A or A+ (or even A-) method (not system), why leave? Which can start another damn thread (no time for that). Is every method *EXACTLY* the same in regards to end results? Is one method BETTER than another? Geez, my head is spinning now.

This is where I leave you. Packer game is on in 45 minutes and I still have some cooking to do.

Ken

I would hazard a guess and say all "flat betting" is the same regarding end results, and progressions will lose slower or faster or not. The end result will be 0 bankroll either way I suppose. So a method that gives you more game time (spins) might be considered better. I'm just thinking out loud and writing it here. Enjoy your game.

[button]

This is human nature

Many of the strategies i played won EVERY session with a 20% win goal. My quads for example

But ultimately failed because i wanted more

The whole human thing sucks

GREED kicks in when you win quickly early.  The number of times I have doubled my BR within 4-6 spins and tell myself to leave, but instead I stay and start missing and by doing so have to stay longer to get back to the double BR position.  Crazy but greed is a hard emotion to control.