Wstreaker24

[soggett]

Bankroll  i sugest around 300 units(stop-loss 150) if bet 2units on splits and 1 unit on numbers,
and if play with 0,20 and 0,10 then bankroll 30 units.
Thanks for that file.

No problem, thank you for the system 

[Kattila]

Hi, now if i have the tool I can test more versions.
This could be second version, but open to new tweaks.

[soggett]

Kattila could you just go over this spins, I think I played them correctly dispite the negative balance at the end, thanks

Gonna go check your version 2

[soggett]

About version two - how do we handle multiple triggers?

[Kattila]

Kattila could you just go over this spins, I think I played them correctly dispite the negative balance at the end, thanks

Gonna go check your version 2

Yes Soggett i see all ok in your test, only not understand why is no bet from spin
17 to 28  but not really matter. Important is this ....from -156  up  to +60  .
Not easy to catch that :w streaks.

thanks

[Kattila]

About version two - how do we handle multiple triggers?

You mean when have : on more than one group.
I think this way.... go from A to E ....ABCDEABCDEA....
and when find trigger bet.
For example we have finished to bet on group B , now we
are looking for : in group C , if no trigger there go to D ...so on..


cheers

[soggett]

Yes Soggett i see all ok in your test, only not understand why is no bet from spin
17 to 28  but not really matter. Important is this ....from -156  up  to +60  .
Not easy to catch that :w streaks.

thanks

I had no trigger - after the group C the group with the most L's was C again so I waited for a different group to show up. Since it was a tie I waited until one group had more L's than the other.
Is that correct? Or should I have betted on C again?

Did you see the 15 W in a row? wow
I'm getting better at this 
Thanks for checking

You mean when have : on more than one group.
I think this way.... go from A to E ....ABCDEABCDEA....
and when find trigger bet.
For example we have finished to bet on group B , now we
are looking for : in group C , if no trigger there go to D ...so on..


cheers

Ok, got it

[Kattila]

Hi Soggett, i made more tests on both( and others) versions and
have mixed results, I think i too hard to catch the W streaks ...we never
know when they will occur.  Pitty because i have seen various W streaks
most have around 10 Ws and even 18 Ws.
I still will try different triggers and report if i find something stable.
What i noticed is when 2 or 3 groups works ok at the same time ,
the other groups works bad, then seems to change .......

cheers

[soggett]

Yes, I noticed that too
Well we can't have a system where we bet only :: streaks now can we?
But I agree, the wining streaks are awesome if U hit one

note:
i tried when we have two or more triggers (version 2) to look at past results and see who had the closest L and then play that group:
like:
L  W  W  L  L
L  W  W  W W
W W  W  W  W  - two triggers
no I looked previous spins and see who has closest L - that way I tried to hit the group the maybe starts a :w streak.
It ended average so I guess no advantage to that