• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

CODE 4

Started by amk, Jun 08, 03:15 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 12 Guests are viewing this topic.

amk

This method just got me thinking about CODE 4...............

Still have to test.........

Idea is play CODE 4 with a column repeat trigger, the more the better........

1C2A     
2C3B

  C
  C is our trigger.....

Now bet against 1C2A........

If you have two columns that repeat even better.......

1C3B
2C2B

  C  B
  C  B  is our trigger......

Now bet against 1C3B.........

amk


GLC

Quote from: amk on Jul 28, 04:45 PM 2011
This method just got me thinking about CODE 4...............

Still have to test.........

Idea is play CODE 4 with a column repeat trigger, the more the better........

1C2A     
2C3B

  C
  C is our trigger.....

Now bet against 1C2A........

If you have two columns that repeat even better.......

1C3B
2C2B

  C  B
  C  B  is our trigger......

Now bet against 1C3B.........

Good thought AMK.  Might as well include the dozens as well.  Any repeat of dozens or columns should be the same odds.  More betting opportunity.

G
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

amk

oooooooo yes......

bombay67

Hi AMK, JohnLegend and everybody else,

Many thanks to you all for providing us with the ideas and help that you do.

I have been using D&C for a bit and have now moved onto Code4.

This question has been asked before but I'm still not clear on the answer to this, so let me give you some real numbers that I was faced with: -

24,3,6,2       = 2 C 1 B   this is Code 1 to oppose in game 1

4,29,14,15   = 1 B 2 C   this is Code 2 to oppose in game 2

8,14,11,0     = 1 B 1 0   this should be virtual line - is this still the same, can I ignore it?

21,7,32,21   = 2 A 3 C   this should be a win on 2nd bet for col A ( against C )

3,35,17,1     = 1 B 2 A   this should be a win on 4th bet for col A (against B - scary moment though)

14,31,0,11   = 2 A 0 A   what should I do with this line, dump it and just use the next three?

30,35,13,32 = 3 B 2 B  is this the Code 1 to oppose in the next game 1

35,18,24,9   = 3 C 2 C  is this the Code 2 to oppose in the next game 2

18,20,4,21   = 2 B 1 C  this is the virtual line

I know that you and JohnLegend have advised to cut and run at just two games and it seems a great plan but JohnLegend also says he logs lines after he has finished betting and I know there are a few who have tested this in continuous play.

Many thanks for your advice and please keep up the great work you are an inspiration.

Regards

Bombay67

Johnlegend

Quote from: amk on Jul 28, 04:34 PM 2011
Well, as I say JohnLegend random.org is not LIVE WHEEL results.........

At random.org the lines tested looked like this......

211212
221212

Keep in mind that there was no zero.....

Either way HIT AND RUN will look nice............
This is what I feel about any manmade random simulator. IT BEHAVES TOO LOGICALLY. By that I mean  its designed to give you average outcomes. As you tell me random.org showed you eight losses over 500 lines I am 260/1 from real spins.

What a manmade simulator does is take your progression and more or less deliver a breakeven scenario over a given number of spins. TRUE RANDOM SIMPLY doesn't BEHAVE THIS WAY.

Yes there will be times when 7 wins will be followed by a loss for say PATTERN BREAKER. But there will also be times when you don't see a loss for 4 x the paper odds. Especially in HIT AND RUN PLAY.

And this will only be magnified by even bigger paper odds. Hence the reason I have now broken 600 winning games and STILL NO LOSS for CODE 4.

With paper odds of 80/1 I should have lost 6 times at least by now. And were I playing even FIVE GAME SESSIONS. I would own SEVEN LOSSES.

There is no greater indicator to me that TWO BY TWO PLAY. Has given me a huge advantage.

Now a method with paper odds of 63/1 went nearly 250 lines before it lost. And the MATRIX SLIDE doesn't look like it will ever surrender an 80 unit progression.

But it takes time to chew, it cannot be rushed. INVINCIBILITY COMES AT A PRICE FEW ARE WILLING OR ABLE TO PAY.

I can wait for something that will deliver an awesome strikerate. CAN YOU?


Robeenhuut

Quote from: Johnlegend on Jul 29, 11:39 AM 2011
This is what I feel about any manmade random simulator. IT BEHAVES TOO LOGICALLY. By that I mean  its designed to give you average outcomes. As you tell me random.org showed you eight losses over 500 lines I am 260/1 from real spins.

What a manmade simulator does is take your progression and more or less deliver a breakeven scenario over a given number of spins. TRUE RANDOM SIMPLY doesn't BEHAVE THIS WAY.

Yes there will be times when 7 wins will be followed by a loss for say PATTERN BREAKER. But there will also be times when you don't see a loss for 4 x the paper odds. Especially in HIT AND RUN PLAY.

And this will only be magnified by even bigger paper odds. Hence the reason I have now broken 600 winning games and STILL NO LOSS for CODE 4.

With paper odds of 80/1 I should have lost 6 times at least by now. And were I playing even FIVE GAME SESSIONS. I would own SEVEN LOSSES.

There is no greater indicator to me that TWO BY TWO PLAY. Has given me a huge advantage.

Now a method with paper odds of 63/1 went nearly 250 lines before it lost. And the MATRIX SLIDE doesn't look like it will ever surrender an 80 unit progression.

But it takes time to chew, it cannot be rushed. INVINCIBILITY COMES AT A PRICE FEW ARE WILLING OR ABLE TO PAY.

I can wait for something that will deliver an awesome strikerate. CAN YOU?

Hello John

I lost a first game ever played but i only went 3 steps.  But i would have lost if i had gone all d way.  I guess bad karma  ;D
Since then 200+ wins so Patience guys.

Regards

Matt

Johnlegend

Quote from: Robeenhuut on Jul 31, 03:51 AM 2011
Hello John

I lost a first game ever played but I only went 3 steps.  But I would have lost if I had gone all d way.  I guess bad karma  ;D
Since then 200+ wins so Patience guys.

Regards
Yes thats the word look at any method longterm. If you dont you will miss out and waste many years, never getting anywhere. You were very unfortunate to enter the cycle at the wrong time on that first game.

Johnlegend

Quote from: bombay67 on Jul 29, 10:00 AM 2011
Hi AMK, JohnLegend and everybody else,

Many thanks to you all for providing us with the ideas and help that you do.

I have been using D&C for a bit and have now moved onto Code4.

This question has been asked before but I'm still not clear on the answer to this, so let me give you some real numbers that I was faced with: -

24,3,6,2       = 2 C 1 B   this is Code 1 to oppose in game 1

4,29,14,15   = 1 B 2 C   this is Code 2 to oppose in game 2

8,14,11,0     = 1 B 1 0   this should be virtual line - is this still the same, can I ignore it?

21,7,32,21   = 2 A 3 C   this should be a win on 2nd bet for col A ( against C )

3,35,17,1     = 1 B 2 A   this should be a win on 4th bet for col A (against B - scary moment though)

14,31,0,11   = 2 A 0 A   what should I do with this line, dump it and just use the next three?

30,35,13,32 = 3 B 2 B  is this the Code 1 to oppose in the next game 1

35,18,24,9   = 3 C 2 C  is this the Code 2 to oppose in the next game 2

18,20,4,21   = 2 B 1 C  this is the virtual line

I know that you and JohnLegend have advised to cut and run at just two games and it seems a great plan but JohnLegend also says he logs lines after he has finished betting and I know there are a few who have tested this in continuous play.

Many thanks for your advice and please keep up the great work you are an inspiration.

Regards

Bombay67
Hello Bombay67, a zero in the virtual line should be ignored. If however its in one of the two code lines I advise you START OVER.

Do not break up the first two code lines. I believe they give the way I play a certain advantage. BTW welcome to the ultimate ROULETTE FORUM...

Johnlegend

CODE 4 RESULTS UPDATE FOR 31/07/2011

TOTAL GAMES PLAYED 650

TOTAL GAMES WON 649

TOTAL GAMES LOST 1

STRIKERATE 649/1

BALANCE 1140 UNITS PLUS

STEP 1 WINS 330

STEP 2 WINS 195

STEP 3 WINS 110

STEP 4 WINS 14--LOSSES 1

Well it had to lose at some point, and it took a zero in the line to do it. But still 649/1 is some strikerate. I will see if I can still make it 1000/1

topcat888

Amazing John, amazing..!  :o

Kingspin

Amazing but no one playing it  ???
You cant always loose , but when you do loose you will win it all back.

trebor

Great results JL and I see you have lost at last so maybe you are human after all.   :)

Robert

Johnlegend

Quote from: trebor on Jul 31, 02:30 PM 2011
Great results JL and I see you have lost at last so maybe you are human after all.   :)

Robert
Last time I checked I was Trebor, LoL. I only survived that long because of my two by two play. Nothing longer would have worked. Unfortunately theres one method sitting on this forum that isnt going to get its due from other members.

But I suspect already it cannot lose in the HIT AND RUN application. In fact I don't think it will lose however you play it. I'm talking about THE MATRIX SLIDE.

I will stay with it to find out, its what we must do. I believe its identified another of randoms Achilles heels. It may have in fact broken randoms leg altogether. I will endeavour to find out.

xupamagaita

We all know that there is the possibilitie of loss. But there will be thousands of exit points in good profit.
Face this as a long run system, compound your winnings and exit whenever you want.

I made more than 1300 wins without a loss so far.

Explore your limits first betting with cents

-