*PATTERN BREAKER*

[Tinsoldiers]

Havent got time now to go through the whole 14k plus. This is the performance of the last 1000 games. 10 times 100.

91--9
92--8
93--7
90-10
92-8
93-7
94-6
93-7
92-8
93-7

Fantastic results sentinel. Is the last 4 94-6, 93-7, 92-8 and 93-7 tracking all 3 ECs from your 400 odd games. Wow, amazing Dramatic improvement from Just tracking HL which is before that. 

[RouletteGhost]

question

so you track all 3 EC and whatever qualifies first you bet that I know, but then do you retrack or do you keep going until the other 2 EC have betting opportunities?

[sentinel3]

Fantastic results sentinel. Is the last 4 94-6, 93-7, 92-8 and 93-7 tracking all 3 ECs from your 400 odd games. Wow, amazing Dramatic improvement from Just tracking HL which is before that.

Yes TS tracking all three is likely to improve the strikerate.

I would expect to break 94--6 at some point. With my current winning streak of 34 straight games. I have no idea how long that streak might go on for.

You have to understand that with random choosing the bet,
Its steering me away from the losing game more often. You see there are 4 losing games in the sets that i tracked to get that 34 game streak. BUT THEY WERENT THE 🛑FIRST TO QUALIFY🛑. Thats the trick here. Whereas before I would just stick to HIGH LOW. Two of the losses are HIGH LOW.

[sentinel3]

question

so you track all 3 EC and whatever qualifies first you bet that I know, but then do you retrack or do you keep going until the other 2 EC have betting opportunities?

No RG the objective is to get one win from each set. As I said in my previous post. THERE ARE STILL LOSSES HAPPENING IN A SET. But most of the time they arent the FIRST TO QUALIFY.

Thats the beauty here.

[bikemotorman]

Been a long time guys but I went back to playing craps and its a much slower game.
I have played the Pattern Breaker with craps with some very good results, as some may know craps is an almost 50 50 game the 12 on the don't pass is a push you don't lose your wager you just don't get paid a profit.
I have included a sheet that I tested PB to see how it would work for craps................this is with my throwing station with real dice and it took three hours to get the results you see on the sheet, man patience and disciplined is the KEY.

Any word on my old buddy Lanky I have not spoken to him in years.

Stuart Brandt


Craps is a totally random, non-dependant, negative expectancy game of chance.  Which means the casino knows over the long haul they have the mathematical advantage over the player.  Theoretically, if a player gambles continuously for weeks, months, and years, his bankroll is destined to ruin by the casino’s build in win advantage or “vigorish.”  However, as an intelligent, knowledgeable, and disciplined player and precision shooter, things are not as forbidding as the mathematicians would lead one to believe.  First, the player will not be playing continuously 24 hours per day every day.  He will limit his time and capital exposure, then use his methods to maximize his chance to capture a profitable trend in the ebb and flow of craps decisions.  Always, the player will employ smart money management to conserve and protect his bankroll against adverse trends in the game.  Realistically, the player should experience many trips to the casino with profitable results.

[RouletteGhost]

No RG the objective is to get one win from each set. As I said in my previous post. THERE ARE STILL LOSSES HAPPENING IN A SET. But most of the time they arent the FIRST TO QUALIFY.

Thats the beauty here.

having trouble completely understanding

not your fault

so you track the 3 EC, then you bet the first EC that has one pattern remaining...then that is it? you are done? or you can sit and wait for the other 2 to qualify?

thanks

[sentinel3]

having trouble completely understanding

not your fault

so you track the 3 EC, then you bet the first EC that has one pattern remaining...then that is it? you are done? or you can sit and wait for the other 2 to qualify?

thanks

You are done RG. You shut it down and come back later or got to another site/table...

[Andre Chass]

There's no difference you play one spin for 100 days or 100 spins in one day.

Gambler's Fallacy

But you can try to avoid the variance changing the table or giving it a break in each bet

[sentinel3]

There's no difference you play one spin for 100 days or 100 spins in one day.

Gambler's Fallacy

But you can try to avoid the variance changing the table or giving it a break in each bet

It works giving it a break or changing the site/table. Or else I wouldnt be doing it simple as that.

All that matters to me is that when i play a 100 games of PB. I hit my percentage target of an average of 92 wins 8 losses. I will leave all the arguments about variance house edge and the rest to people who cant even stay with a system for a 100 games. So will never know this game can be beaten year in year out by a mechanical system like PB...

[Tinsoldiers]

Yes TS tracking all three is likely to improve the strikerate.

Are you sure sentinel you are not making any mistakes in tracking your statistics? May be the low winrate is down to your way of writing statistics which are wrong and actually you may be getting better stats. What you think ?

[sentinel3]

Are you sure sentinel you are not making any mistakes in tracking your statistics? May be the low winrate is down to your way of writing statistics which are wrong and actually you may be getting better stats. What you think ?

No TS. What low winrate? You dont think an average of 92--8 is decent?

Remember im only into my 5th 100 with the revised system. And as I write this im 35--0. That means if I lose 5 games in the next 65. An average of 12--1 (very achievable). I have a new record of 95-5. I will take that TS.

That would represent 60 pure units of profit. Without ever raising the progression. My best ever profit margin. Now imagine those units are worth £100 each. You are laughing.

[Tinsoldiers]

You said your last 400 games win rate is 94-6, 93-7, 92-8 and 93-7. That means you have lost 28 games in the last 400. You also mentioned earlier

Summary of results so far.

GAMES PLAYED=425
GAMES WON=400
GAMES LOST=25

This means you would have got the best of 94-6 at least three times in the last 4 100 games. Worst case scenario.  But you seem to deny it. So I thought the stats you are saying doesn’t marry up and you need help with your stats. 

[sentinel3]

You said your last 400 games win rate is 94-6, 93-7, 92-8 and 93-7. That means you have lost 28 games in the last 400. You also mentioned earlier
This means you would have got the best of 94-6 at least three times in the last 4 100 games. Worst case scenario.  But you seem to deny it. So I thought the stats you are saying doesn’t marry up and you need help ?Because im on an INCREDIBLE winning streak right now of 35 straight games. Its offset those stats UNTIL I complete 500 games. Are you with me?

If I had just given you the breakdown for the 400 games as I did yesterday. Those individual breakdowns should be 435--28. So I was out by three games over my last post.

When I divide a all the losses into the winners over 11 years. The average right now is 92--8. But thats going to improve for sure as play more games of the revised system.

[Tinsoldiers]

I think you have a better strike rate that you portray.  Whichever way you look at you seem to have hit three 94-6 or better in your last 425 games you started since December.  So your stats are wrong.  Even if you are on an incredible strike rate it should make better and not worse as your have given 94-6, 93-7, 92-8, and 93-7.  Your stats doesn’t seem right.

[sentinel3]

I think you have a better strike rate that you portray.  Whichever way you look at you seem to have hit three 94-6 or better in your last 425 games you started since December.  So your stats are wrong.  Even if you are on an incredible strike rate it should make better and not worse as your have given 94-6, 93-7, 92-8, and 93-7.  Your stats doesn’t seem right.

TS I made an era with my last update okay it should have been 397--28. Can you ever forgive me?.

Its going to be a better strikerate. Im 35--0 in my latest 100 THE BEST START EVER!!