• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*PATTERN BREAKER*

Started by Johnlegend, Apr 08, 05:46 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 13 Guests are viewing this topic.

sentinel3

Quote from: CoderJoe on Apr 07, 03:37 AM 2018
This is nonsense. If leaving 18 hours between your sessions is important to the success of the system, then why don't you mention it in the rules? And if it's not important it doesn't matter does it? And time isn't important anyway, if it actually meant anything it would be the number of spins between sessions which made the difference, not the number of hours. Suppose you get held up on your way to the casino because your car breaks down and start to play later than you intended. Then you win, have you won because you were late?  ;D

If random events like this make the difference between winning and losing then obviously it's not the system rules which cause you to win. And If playing at random times is important you can still get the computer to mirror them by using an RNG to skip a random number of spins in a file. You can get it to mirror playing at different wheels by using multiple spin files containing spins from different wheels.

Or perhaps you believe that something like scratching your arse after every loss or wearing a green shirt is causing you to win. In that case you've got me; a computer can't mimick that.  ;D

I really don't care whether anyone continues to believe that PB is a winning system. What I mind is that you are deliberately trying to convince people that simulations are invalid. I'll leave it up to readers to decide why, but it's not that hard to figure out.  ;)
They are invalid PERIOD. And I am going to be the one to prove that.

You carry on playing with your simulator. I will carry one winning above BREAK EVEN POINT..Thats the REALITY.

Joe

Guys, just be aware who you're dealing with here. sentinel3 is John Legend / Fender. He's been around for years and has appeared on numerous forums always making the same ludicrous claims. He seems to be a compulsive liar.

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=11347.0

Logic. It's always in the way.

Andre Chass

Quote from: Ricky on Apr 07, 12:00 AM 2018
From 7 hours not seeing a single 3 peater I get two opportunities in 10 minutes including this 2 peater. Decided to go for it to avoid losing another session. Won with the Tie. Always cover the Tie on Big bets this is why. I had 160 euro plus 15 euro on Tie for the start of the 5th repeat. I won on the Tie. Ended up losing 25 euro overall. Better than 125 euro. But could have been worse.
Ok In hindsight FLAT BETTING would have worked here with a bonus Tie and my money back on the second bet risking only 50 euro. But with Hindsight you always makes the right decision  ;D
cheers
Ricky



Ricky,

I sent you a pm.  Check it
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

Quote from: CoderJoe on Apr 07, 04:34 AM 2018
Guys, just be aware who you're dealing with here. sentinel3 is John Legend / Fender. He's been around for years and has appeared on numerous forums always making the same ludicrous claims. He seems to be a compulsive liar.

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=11347.0

Again...

What the hell is going on here!?!
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

viclimks

Quote from: CoderJoe on Apr 07, 03:37 AM 2018
This is nonsense. If leaving 18 hours between your sessions is important to the success of the system, then why don't you mention it in the rules? And if it's not important it doesn't matter does it? And time isn't important anyway, if it actually meant anything it would be the number of spins between sessions which made the difference, not the number of hours. Suppose you get held up on your way to the casino because your car breaks down and start to play later than you intended. Then you win, have you won because you were late?  ;D

If random events like this make the difference between winning and losing then obviously it's not the system rules which cause you to win. And If playing at random times is important you can still get the computer to mirror them by using an RNG to skip a random number of spins in a file. You can get it to mirror playing at different wheels by using multiple spin files containing spins from different wheels.

Or perhaps you believe that something like scratching your arse after every loss or wearing a green shirt is causing you to win. In that case you've got me; a computer can't mimick that.  ;D

I really don't care whether anyone continues to believe that PB is a winning system. What I mind is that you are deliberately trying to convince people that simulations are invalid. I'll leave it up to readers to decide why, but it's not that hard to figure out.  ;)
U Will Never Know Cox U Never Try.... Testing n Reality  is Different .... 🤐🤐🤐

Ricky

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Apr 07, 02:51 AM 2018


JL and others like to use a recovery progression (like 1 2, then 2 4, etc.).

I do NOT like recovery progressions.

When I get an LL, I just stick with the 1 2.

And if I get another LL, I still stick to the  1 2.

Also, I do NOT increase the dollar amounts of the betting units.

Another very important thing is NOT to keep playing one game after another.

Just play a few games per day or per casino visit.

The biggest mistake you can make is playing one game after another. You are almost guaranteed to hit the individual losses and, in the worst case scenario, a long losing streak.

For instance, I only play a maximum of 4 games of PB (airball wheel) per casino visit. I can only visit casinos on Fri/Sat nights and my average casino visit lasts on average 6 hours.

So I only play 4 games of PB (airball wheel) in 6 hours.

And I do NOT play those 4 games of PB consecutively.

I play 2 games of PB and then I play other methods or do other stuff for the next 1-2 hours and then play the remaining 2 games of PB -- and I am done with PB for roulette for the rest of the night.

I do play 2 games of PB at baccarat also.

Ideally, I would like to reverse the above numbers: 2 games of PB at roulette and 4 games of PB at baccarat per casino visit, but the tables for the latter are always full even well after midnight.

One thing I will warn you about: You play PB or any other roulette method continuously throughout the evening or per casino visit, you will most likely LOSE money.

The key remains this: for the best chance of success playing PB, play it on a hit-and-run basis and play it SPARINGLY.

This approach has been working for me consistently since the summer/fall of 2015.

That is my advice to you.
Hi DR
If you have been following my system that I have shared with PB and MV7 coded you will have noticed that it allows you to run multiple bet selection methods. I now have 9 methods coded. I also have a scoring system which I use to select the best method to use based on what the wheel is doing streaks footprints etc
My goal is to gradually add more rules to simulate real conditions. Simulations will then more accurately reflect the success of a method staking levels and progressions.
So once I confirm methods like PB are good candidates to play as part of a complete system i will be doing exactly as you say, play 2 or 3 games of one method and then move to another method

Coderjoe has mentioned himself that the best systems are the ones that play different methods sparingly. That’s why you cannot play PB continuously without giving it a break and either stop betting or switch systems

Cheers
Ricky

psimoes

Quote from: Andre Chass on Apr 07, 05:41 AM 2018
Again...

What the hell is going on here!?!

Ever heard of the Pied Piper of Hamelin?

On the first time he led the rats through the streets all the way to the cliff. As no one payed him tribute, he now wants to take away the little children.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

Andre Chass

I just want to know

Fender, John Legend and sentinel3 is the same guy with different names?

Some time ago I had given him the benefit of the doubt.

Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

Andre Chass

I think that the moderators have to clarify this situation.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

psimoes

You still dont believe it. Find out for yourself
[Math+1] beats a Math game

atlantis

Quote from: psimoes on Apr 07, 06:57 AM 2018
Ever heard of the Pied Piper of Hamelin?
On the first time he led the rats through the streets all the way to the cliff. As no one payed him tribute, he now wants to take away the little children.


Ahhhahahahahahahaha! :) :) :)

For the Rats:
link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=QuuAZH4C-lY

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

cht

Quote from: Andre Chass on Apr 07, 07:12 AM 2018
I just want to know

Fender, John Legend and sentinel3 is the same guy with different names?

Some time ago I had given him the benefit of the doubt.
Yes Andre.

cht

Quote from: Andre Chass on Apr 07, 07:19 AM 2018
I think that the moderators have to clarify this situation.
What is there to clarify ?

Andre Chass

Quote from: cht on Apr 07, 07:42 AM 2018
What is there to clarify ?

Clarify why moderators are allowing this.
Nothing ventured, nothing gained...

cht

Quote from: Andre Chass on Apr 07, 07:48 AM 2018
Clarify why moderators are allowing this.
The local mob demands it.

The forum requires traffic.

Nice guy is a better role than the bad guy.

Howzat for clarification. :twisted:

-