• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

*PATTERN BREAKER*

Started by Johnlegend, Apr 08, 05:46 PM 2011

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 79 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rolletti


jon86

Quote from: Rolletti on Apr 10, 11:30 AM 2011
Hmm

I think you dont understand or me dont understand what you mean ?

Jon  :)

jon86

Rolleti!

You removed the post .

Jon  :)

ZigZag

Loving the pattern Breaker BUT......

Just an observation really is that I seem to be getting more instant wins betting FOR the pattern rarther than against. I don't know if anybody eles is experiencing this too.

Maybe because that pattern is the most DUE pattern it sometimes actually HITS ???

What you think John?

jon86

Quote from: ZigZag on Apr 10, 12:30 PM 2011
Loving the pattern Breaker BUT......

Just an observation really is that I seem to be getting more instant wins betting FOR the pattern rarther than against. I don't know if anybody eles is experiencing this too.

Maybe because that pattern is the most DUE pattern it sometimes actually HITS ???

What you think John?

We now that its imposible that all 8 pattern hit in a row. How can we work on that knowledge. Can we bet last spin of every pattern that it will be opposit ? It will be 8 stepps and thats crazy 
;D

But we now that the dont hit in order all 8 patterns.

Jon

ZigZag

Quote from: jon86 on Apr 10, 01:31 PM 2011
It will be 8 stepps and that's crazy 


3 steps is enough for my bankroll  :-[

jon86


Johnlegend

Quote from: ZigZag on Apr 10, 12:30 PM 2011
Loving the pattern Breaker BUT......

Just an observation really is that I seem to be getting more instant wins betting FOR the pattern rarther than against. I don't know if anybody eles is experiencing this too.

Maybe because that pattern is the most DUE pattern it sometimes actually HITS ???

What you think John?
I think u may have turned PB into a grail WELL DONE ZIG. Ive been checking back it works let the tech boys test the rev ;D

Twisteruk

Quote from: Johnlegend on Apr 10, 03:44 PM 2011
I think you may have turned PB into a grail WELL DONE ZIG. I've been checking back it works let the tech boys test the rev ;D



So PB works best if played in reverse ?

Bet the last Pattern TO form ?
Its Set In Stone =)

jon86

Quote from: Johnlegend on Apr 10, 03:44 PM 2011
I think you may have turned PB into a grail WELL DONE ZIG. I've been checking back it works let the tech boys test the rev ;D


I dont understand what you mean now?

Bet the last pattern?

Jon

ZigZag

Quote from: Johnlegend on Apr 10, 03:44 PM 2011
I think you may have turned PB into a grail WELL DONE ZIG. I've been checking back it works let the tech boys test the rev ;D


Oh dear what have i done  :D

My observation came as a result of playing the original way most of my wins came from 2nd or 3rd step. Also the DUE factor

My testing is VERY limited so thanks for the clarification from your results John  :thumbsup:

Twisteruk

JL

Can you post your results from your gathered data with regard to playin this in reverse ?


Is it now best to bet the last pattern TO form ?
Its Set In Stone =)

Johnlegend

Quote from: Twisteruk on Apr 10, 03:52 PM 2011

So PB works best if played in reverse ?

Bet the last Pattern TO form ?
Twister Zigs observation just made a good method into a GREAT ONE. Just as you and Atlantis helped me perfect the MATRIX VERTICAL concept. ZIG ZAG has just made an incredible observation I couldnt realize on my own.

Actually Mike got me thinking earlier today about betting for the last pattern instead of against. I've only checked 200 of my past results so far, but it would appear that TOTAL NON MATCHES to the final pattern are a lot less frequent than total or partial MATCHES.

PATTERN BREAKER MAY NOW BE IN GRAIL WATERS. ;D :o ;D

Twisteruk

Quote from: Johnlegend on Apr 10, 04:38 PM 2011
Twister Zigs observation just made a good method into a GREAT ONE. Just as you and Atlantis helped me perfect the MATRIX VERTICAL concept. ZIG ZAG has just made an incredible observation I couldnt realize on my own.

Actually Mike got me thinking earlier today about betting for the last pattern instead of against. I've only checked 200 of my past results so far, but it would appear that TOTAL NON MATCHES to the final pattern are a lot less frequent than total or partial MATCHES.

PATTERN BREAKER MAY NOW BE IN GRAIL WATERS. ;D :o ;D


Awesome  :xd:

Maybe you could post a breakdown of all your data ?

would be good to see it as you have the numbers  :thumbsup:
Its Set In Stone =)

jon86

Johnlegen/Zigzag .

So you say that its better result if bet the last pattern will hit?

Best Jon

-