CODE 4

[artattack]

Thanks AMK.

The Round Table with 37 slots.

I have been recording all my spins recently, I now have 2926 spins that I have monitored.

From a CODE 4 perspective.

COLUMN B  has hit  976 times     maximum sleep  18      max repeat  8
1st DOZEN has hit   954 times      maximum sleep  17      max repeat  7
3rd DOZEN has hit  948 times      maximum sleep   18      max repeat  6
COLUMN A has hit   943 times      maximum sleep   25     max repeat   6
2nd DOZEN has hit  941 times      maximum sleep  16      max repeat   8
COLUMN C  has hit  924 times      maximum sleep   20     max repeat   5

That to me looks fine, but it is how they have recently fallen within the CODE 4 matrix that make it interesting.

In particular the 1st part of CODE 4 
I am still getting a hit 50% of the time just like Johns figures.

I am now currently playing CODE 4 (continuous mode) betting FOR the 1st part of the code rather than against.  5   10/10   30/30   90/90   Bankroll 265  using units of 5

Just for 20 spins though  (4 games)

I have also just started monitoring betting FOR the 1st  part of the code  and FOR the 2nd part of the code using  units   5    10   20/20   60/60    Bankroll needed 175   using units of 5

Arthur

[vundarosa]

Thanks AMK.

The Round Table with 37 slots.

I have been recording all my spins recently, I now have 2926 spins that I have monitored.

From a CODE 4 perspective.

COLUMN B  has hit  976 times     maximum sleep  18      max repeat  8
1st DOZEN has hit   954 times      maximum sleep  17      max repeat  7
3rd DOZEN has hit  948 times      maximum sleep   18      max repeat  6
COLUMN A has hit   943 times      maximum sleep   25     max repeat   6
2nd DOZEN has hit  941 times      maximum sleep  16      max repeat   8
COLUMN C  has hit  924 times      maximum sleep   20     max repeat   5

That to me looks fine, but it is how they have recently fallen within the CODE 4 matrix that make it interesting.

In particular the 1st part of CODE 4 
I am still getting a hit 50% of the time just like Johns figures.

I am now currently playing CODE 4 (continuous mode) betting FOR the 1st part of the code rather than against.  5   10/10   30/30   90/90   Bankroll 265  using units of 5

Just for 20 spins though  (4 games)

I have also just started monitoring betting FOR the 1st  part of the code  and FOR the 2nd part of the code using  units   5    10   20/20   60/60    Bankroll needed 175   using units of 5

Arthur

-----------------

artattack, it seems you're playing your code 4 betting one line against the one just before it, not like amk had it, one line against the 3rd line ago...right?!

vundarosa

[GLC]

Hello GLC!
How do you count profit? Why you multiply 492x2?
Thanks.

Don, It's because he won 507 out of 1001  1001-507 = 494 X 2 = 988.


Remember he won on the 507 betting the opposite 2 dozens.  If we bet a single dozen, we will win all the bets he lost.  When we win, we win 2 to 1.  We would have lost the 507 bets that he won on.  So subtract 507 from 988 = 481.


See JL's post.

[artattack]

Hi Vundarosa, you are correct.

I did say that I was playing continuous and not as suggested by John.

Although only for 20 spins, so I still think there is the hit and run factor.

Betting for the 1st doz in the code is still holding up for me.

After 71 sessions I have:

36  hits against the 1st doz    and 35 hits for the 1st dozen.

so it is far more profitable to bet for the 1st doz and of course less bankroll needed.

I still cannot understand why it is almost  50x50, I suspect it will change over many sessions, but John has logged a 1000 sessions and it holds up for those sessions even though John does not bet for the 1st dozen.

Arthur.

[Johnlegend]

Hi Vundarosa, you are correct.

I did say that I was playing continuous and not as suggested by John.

Although only for 20 spins, so I still think there is the hit and run factor.

Betting for the 1st doz in the code is still holding up for me.

After 71 sessions I have:

36  hits against the 1st doz    and 35 hits for the 1st dozen.

so it is far more profitable to bet for the 1st doz and of course less bankroll needed.

I still cannot understand why it is almost  50x50, I suspect it will change over many sessions, but John has logged a 1000 sessions and it holds up for those sessions even though John does not bet for the 1st dozen.

Arthur.

Arthur I cannot see that percentage changing dramaticaly. It would take 667 hits on step one for us to lose 1 unit. Now this is all at level stakes. We havent even begun to entertain the possibilities of using a multi level FLAT STAKING SYSTEM. Then profit will be a certainty even if there were 667 hits on step 1 out of every 1000. Or 67 out of every 100

[artattack]

I will just keep playing and monitoring for the moment.

I will report after 100 sessions, but so far betting

Against 1st doz only using     5/5  15/15  45/45  135/135   risk  400,  I stand at 375 still short of 1st bank  (75 sessions)


For the 1st doz only using      5   10/10   30/30   90/90   risk  265   I stand at 530 and have  made 2nd bank  (71 sessions)

This is though continuous mode not as JL would play it.

[amk]

2850 bets, +177 units.........................

I am looking at developing a 3 unit profit per session method and stopping................

[amk]

This was flat betting against the entire pattern back to back....................

[amk]

Sorry, minor detail, betting for the pattern not against..................

[vundarosa]

Sorry, minor detail, betting for the pattern not against..................

-----------------

amk,

now you're getting somewhere! I've been testing betting for the pattern and the results are looking promising... i've looked so far at 1700 continuous spins and the longest i've gone without a hit on the previous line/pattern was 18 times once and 15 times twice...i was testing with a modified fibo but will also have a look at how it would perform flat betting



vundarosa

[artattack]

Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505


97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.

[Johnlegend]

Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505


97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.

King Arthur, lf I tell you that youve highlighted a sleeping giant. I'm understating what we now have before us. Quite simply losing is fast leaving the arena. Even to level stakes PLAYING ONLY for a match on the first step looks like a longterm winner. I'm breaking my play down to 100 game tests.

As I've long believed random can be tamed in that marker. I had success before playing the original MATRIX 50 with this thinking. But multi level staking was essential to raise a profit margin.

Here I firmly believe we have the makings of a true HOLY GRAIL. A method that will continually profit to level stakes.

THOSE have always been the requirements for the purists. I believe this fits those requirements. Although my first 1000 game breakdown, is nowhere near a big enough sample. To draw an absolute conclusion.

There is no way I can see a big enough swing in the percentages to show negative figures. For me personally. 5000 completed games. With positive numbers, will be enough to safisfy my suspicions. When I have anorher 500 played games il post up the results.

I'm playing this one continually, yes because I really believe its as good as I've aforementioned......

[warrior]

Just an update after 101 games

Continuous betting   5/5  15/15   45/45   135/135

Betting against the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  58
2nd step wins 26
3rd step wins 11
4th step wins 6

no losses

Winnings 505



97 games betting for the dozen on the 1st step

1st step wins  43
2nd step wins 37
3rd step wins 13
4th step wins 3

1 loss

Winnings 430

The jury is still out for me regarding betting for or against.

I am though playing FOR the dozen on the 1st step

Arthur.

can you please explain how you play exactly thanks.

[roulprofessional]

yeah..nice work

[artattack]

Ok Warrior.

I have just played this session.

I play for just 20 spins   using this progression   

5  units for the 1st bet
2  x  10 units for the 2nd
2  x  30 units for the 3rd
2  x  60 units for the 4th

Total bank needed 265 units

this was the sequence
1C3C
2A2A
2B1A
2B3A
0B2C

The red figures are where I won



I record the 1st 4 hits

DOZ   COL   DOZ   COL
   1       C        3       C

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 1st dozen

   2     the 2nd doz hit so we lost  now bet 2 x  5 units that the next result will not be COL C

   2        A    we win 5  that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

   2        A          2        A

Time to bet again using this new code 2A2A

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen

   2    we win 10 units here because the 2nd doz hit that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

   2         B         1         A

Time to bet again using this new code

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen

    2  we win 10 units here because the 2nd doz hit that's the end of that run we continue to note the results to finish the line

    2        B          3          A

Time to bet again using this new code

Now bet 5 units that the next result will be in the 2nd dozen


    O   zero came up here so lost that one now bet 2 x  5 units that the next result will not be COL B

    O        B    We lost again because we were betting   5 units on  A  and  C

                    We now bet  2  x   30  units against the 3rd Doz.

    O         B        2     we win because the 2nd doz hit. that is the end of that and my session.

the last spin not used was column C

    O         B        2        C

If a zero occurs I just carry on as if it was a loss, but  I would not use the code above if it has a zero in it for the next code.  so 0B2C would be void for the next bet.

Total profit for this one session of 4 games was 30 units

When I play my next session I start with a brand new code 4

I hope this helps.

Arthur.