• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Revisiting A.D.D.

Started by atlantis, Feb 27, 10:58 AM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost

A sore the says "pull" confuses mogul

:xd:

(Jk)
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

*door

Not sore

Thanks for the 2 minute edit time steve
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

atlantis

Quote from: mogul397 on Feb 28, 12:27 PM 2017
The thread I posted...

link:://forum.x/index.php?topic=1376.0

Is about single dozen.  Perhaps betting for a repeat of the previous
2 dozen when you get 2 within 3 for 2 bets would help.


Hi mogul - Quite Interesting!  :)
OK - Let's switcheroo it round then!

Here's my previous results again but this time just betting FOR the dominant doz instead of against...

This time I use very mild single doz progression (highest was 2u in my test or can use eg: GLAT progression)
Also I bet three times as opposed to just 2 in the "against" version.

231             
223             
122  L1;w2                                    +1
232  w2                                         +3
012 
222         
313             
132  L1;w2                                    +4
313             
121  L1;L1;L1  (now up to 2u)       +1
121  w4                                         +5
313  L1; w2                                   +6
223 
131  L1;L1;L1                               +3
330             
323             
213  L2; L2; w4                             +3
331           
232  L2; w4                                   +5
123  L1; w2                                   +6
333             
213             
112             
122  w2                                         +7
112  L1; L1; w2                             +7
213  L1; w2                                   +8
330   
321             
122             
231  w2                                        +10
232             
231  w2                                        +12
223             
212  w2                                        +14
201             
321             
223             
333  L1; L1; L1   (up to 2)            +11
132             
132             
210             
222             
233             
333 w4                                         +15
113             
311 L1; w2                                    +16
132 w2
211               
233 L1; L1 ;L1  (up to 2)              +13           
123
333   
212     
213 w4                                         +17
332             
133 L1; w2                                   +18
322 w2                                         +20
312 L1; L1; w2                             +20

Seems that +10pts more than the A.D.D. way.

:ooh: :smile: :twisted:

Good Luck (if you need it!!!)
Thanks,

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

bleep24

It is not sleepers that kill this, it is repeaters.

Played a session today.  Came out a touch in front.  6 steps forward - 6 steps back so still pretty good.

Will have another session tomorrow and see how it goes.

Brian

RouletteGhost

So.... 1 3 9 27 81

??

:twisted:
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

bleep24

I should have said 7 steps forward, 6 steps back.  Also posted about repeaters before seeing change of method.  Obviously now repeaters are good.

Bleep

bleep24

No RG, we are not going down that road.  We all know where it ends.

RouletteGhost

On a serious note

On the original ADD

The general consensus is betting only the 1st two bets of the matrix with a 1-1 and is a loss a 2-2??
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

thelaw

Lanky's Divisor would be a more conservative progression for this bet selection.

Perhaps looking for +1 unit per hour of play (50-60spins) + an emergency progressive bank (100-200-400-800) after a certain loss limit is reached would create a full-proof method for long-term play.

Not exciting.........but very profitable, as the betting range would stay pretty limited.......so well under the table limits at all times. :thumbsup:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

mogul397

It was just a thought question. Because in real time you can get the
impression that it is a rolling method.

After all, just because you just played one trigger, doesn't mean that you
couldn't fall into the next trigger. And what's to say that that would be
where you entered play?
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 28, 12:55 PM 2017
*door

Not sore

Thanks for the 2 minute edit time steve

You were right the first time.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

Quote from: atlantis on Feb 28, 03:12 PM 2017

Hi mogul - Quite Interesting!  :)
OK - Let's switcheroo it round then!

Here's my previous results again but this time just betting FOR the dominant doz instead of against...

This time I use very mild single doz progression (highest was 2u in my test or can use eg: GLAT progression)
Also I bet three times as opposed to just 2 in the "against" version.

231             
223             
122  L1;w2                                    +1
232  w2                                         +3
012 
222         
313             
132  L1;w2                                    +4
313             
121  L1;L1;L1  (now up to 2u)       +1
121  w4                                         +5
313  L1; w2                                   +6
223 
131  L1;L1;L1                               +3
330             
323             
213  L2; L2; w4                             +3
331           
232  L2; w4                                   +5
123  L1; w2                                   +6
333             
213             
112             
122  w2                                         +7
112  L1; L1; w2                             +7
213  L1; w2                                   +8
330   
321             
122             
231  w2                                        +10
232             
231  w2                                        +12
223             
212  w2                                        +14
201             
321             
223             
333  L1; L1; L1   (up to 2)            +11
132             
132             
210             
222             
233             
333 w4                                         +15
113             
311 L1; w2                                    +16
132 w2
211               
233 L1; L1 ;L1  (up to 2)              +13           
123
333   
212     
213 w4                                         +17
332             
133 L1; w2                                   +18
322 w2                                         +20
312 L1; L1; w2                             +20

Seems that +10pts more than the A.D.D. way.

:ooh: :smile: :twisted:

Good Luck (if you need it!!!)
Thanks,

A.

Not too shabby!!!!!!

While you were all having this gabfest I was away at the casino, trying to figure
out what method to play. I won $16. But not on these. Oddly enough I saw
a setup for the XYY, bet on the two dozen and lost a bet.

Hit AGAIN on my 25/27 thing on the table. They like each other. And I keep wondering
if it suggests anything else.

I'll keep plugging on this.  Good idea and variation.

NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

thelaw

Just for reference from above chart:

LWWLWLLLWLWLLLLLWLWLWWLLWLWWWWLLLWLWWLLLWLWWLLW :thumbsup:

21 wins and 27 losses, so statistically a good run. :ooh:
You sir.......are a monster!!!

RouletteGhost

Allow me to join the party



75 spins
--------------------------------------------------------
25 mini games
--------------------------------------------------------
17 mini games playable with proper trigger
--------------------------------------------------------


Results two ways

*With progression 1-1, 3-3, 9-9, no losses
     +17 units

*With progression 1-1, 2-2,  on first 2 bets of matrix only, one mini game loss
     +3 units




the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

I am not thrilled about being only +3 units after 75 spins

but obviously that was a tough session, lots of 1st try losses then the break even win on the 2nd try

so will entertain the original way of betting only the first two spins of the matrix but perhaps with a 1-1, 3-3

had I done 1-1, 3-3 on first two spins of each mini game, I would have suffered one mini game loss but still made +8 units, and that I can deal with

so for me at this time, testing going forward, I will cap each mini game at 1-1, 3-3 and if lose go back to 1-1 on next mini game

grass roots deja vu hit me. oye.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-