Hounting Repeaters!

[Roulettebeater]

Just take 100 Bucks and play with 0.01 cent on a trusted online casino. That's a bank of 10.000 units!! Trust me, it won't fail. What do you Have to loose? 100 Bucks. Not a bad deal to play this System with a very High winrate if you ask me.

Where do you have a trusted casino with 0,01 live roulette ? In what world do you live in ?

[6th-sense]

They do have a penny table .01 at William hill casino

[jekhb76]

Where do you have a trusted casino with 0,01 live roulette ? In what world do you live in ?

In a world where as Long the game produces Random numbers it can't loose. And there isn't a casino in the world Who has 0.01 cent live tables, but there are some Who Have RNG tables with 0.01 - 300 euro tables/games. I know what you are all thinking but after many years playing there i never had the feeling or noticed that the RNG Table was rigged of some sort. Always played my systems with much succes there. And the payouts where Always in my bank account within 1-3 workdays. So Yeah i know what i'm talking about. I also burned my hands many Times on rigged RNG and online casino's as well, William Hill is one of them. Mostly i play at a BM casino nearby, but sometimes when i don't Have much Time i go to my online casino and play their RNG. And with over 5 years playing there and with More then 5000 on oayouts, i Will continue to do so. When i Have the feeling that it ain't Fair anymore, i'm the First one to quit playing there. But like i said, they payed me many Bucks over the last few years. And as Long as the game is producing Random numbers i can't loose.

[jekhb76]

They do have a penny table .01 at William hill casino

That is one i would avoid if i were you.

[Roulettebeater]

Live with dealer???

You guys, when you learn that RNG is rigged?

[jekhb76]

Live with dealer???

You guys, when you learn that RNG is rigged?

Not to be a Smart ass, but if Mine is rigged, please Let it stay that way 

[Roulettebeater]

Not to be a Smart ass, but if Mine is rigged, please Let it stay that way 

The RNG will suck you dry!

"Never-ever-until-your-death" believe in Casino's RNG...
I studied software engineering and i know well that RNG's seed can be easily manipulated... got it?

[jekhb76]

The RNG will suck you dry!

"Never-ever-until-your-death" believe in Casino's RNG...
I studied software engineering and i know well that RNG's seed can be easily manipulated... got it?

Got it.

[Roulettebeater]

I studied software engineering and i know well that RNG's seed can be easily manipulated... got it?

Perfectus, i wish you all the luck.
Listen to me i just wanna advice you, there is no way to beat RNG, because it's random and it's manipualted.
You can beat physical wheel but no RNG..


If you doubt or not believe me, ask the owner of this forum, if he says otherwise i will give you 100$

[jekhb76]

Perfectus, i wish you all the luck.
Listen to me i just wanna advice you, there is no way to beat RNG, because it's random and it's manipualted.
You can beat physical wheel but no RNG..


If you doubt or not believe me, ask the owner of this forum, if he says otherwise i will give you 100$

I believe you. I Just had extreme luck then All these years. Well Most of the Time i'm in a bm only so No Harm done.

[Bigbroben]

This is just for the heck of it.

Should we bet repeaters, unhits, until when?  Who's right, who's wrong?

The following charts are just observation.  No point of view.  They represent, not how many repeaters in the last x spins, but rather how many of them within the last x spins repeated within their previous x spins. Capisci?

So sometimes many of the numbers were repeaters, other times, a lot less.  We could have for example, in the last 12 spins, 4 numbers that repeated in their last 12 spins.
Depending on the spin window, max and min values vary. 

Could it be worth betting on repeaters when the trends reaches a low value, hoping repeaters will increase, or betting unhits when at ¨peak¨-repeaters, or following trend?  Which trigger to use?  Average? Threshold value?

I'm just saying...

[foreverBOB]

Jekhb76, your approach will eventualy force a too large bet with too many numbers when the 2peaters dont hit. Removing the bet once it hits beyond the 37 spin cycle could be done otherwise: check the gap distance and bet it for the remaining spins to complete its 37 spin cycle. So if a 2peater hits 17 spins later than its first show, then bet it for the remaining 20 spins. This will however need more calculations and is not what Turbo is doing.
It fits in the idea that each spin has its own 37 spin cycle all continuous overlapping the next ones. Something that can be argued since we supposedly are sticking to one cycle that has a clear entry point.

[DoctorSudoku]

So sometimes many of the numbers were repeaters, other times, a lot less. 

Depending on the spin window, max and min values vary.

Your above two sentences (that I have excerpted from your post and highlighted here) pretty much encapsulate the fundamental problem of the repeaters method -- and why it is so immensely difficult to come up with a method that will consistently wring profits from betting on them.

Good job !      

[Bigbroben]

Thanks,
and thanks to Excel... Einstein might have found the God formula if he had had Excel...

Here are some results of all 5000 spins:

18 spin window, so how many of the last 18 nrs were repeaters in their 18 spins window.
Max value: 13
Min value: 2
Median/Average: 7/7.002

15 spin window:
Min: 0
Max: 10
Median/Av: 5/5.04

12 spins window:
Min: 0
Max:9
Med/Av: 3/3.40

24 spins window:
Min: 3
Max:15
Med/Av:9/9.33

27 spins window:
Min:6
Max:19
Med/av:12/12.51

So for sure, if I'd consider a 24 spin window and saw that only 3 of the last 24nrs were repeaters, I'd say more are to come.  Also, if there are 19 of the last 24 that were repeaters, I'd say it is saturated and would  bet accordingly, betting on unhits.  These are extremes, of course, but I guess floor and top values could be determined.

Graph of the 24 spins window, 5000 spins, and 1000.  So floor at 6 and top at 14 for triggers is not bad for 24-window.

[denzie]

@Bigroben....your graphs looks like a jigsaw....which is just fine....stop on a peak and cash in