Easy EC

[ignatus]

@ignatus

When you post these graphs for any of your methods what kinda spins do you use pls ?

RNG or "live" spins ?

thxs

it's all live-spins of what i know, most spins posted here on the forum, alot of live-spins posted by iggyv, some livespins from dublinbet etc...it would be great with more livespins, but no one is posting them anymore?

[ddarko]

it's all live-spins of what i know, most spins posted here on the forum, alot of live-spins posted by iggyv, some livespins from dublinbet etc...it would be great with more livespins, but no one is posting them anymore?

Okay thxs, you want more "actuals" ? hit the "archiv" button, years n years there.....

link:://:.spielbank-wiesbaden.de/index.php?id=101&L=1

[ignatus]

Thanks! 

[P.A]

111: 4 units - 18 won - 14 lost
111: 7 units - 19 won - 12 lost
111: -6 units - 8 won - 14 lost
111: -4 units - 9 won - 13 lost
This is just a sample. A got it run through 3 mil spin and on average it's a 50/50 result. Win/lose

Hi Ray, and Ignatus,

Thanks for your effort.


May u please do a testing like this,

example.
something like this...

111bet taken, 53win/58loss.

111bet taken, 52win/59loss

111bet taken, 50win/61loss
==========================
what this?
111bet taken, 53win/58loss.


[111bet taken,]mean the actual real bet that u really bet, not virtual, or spin that u do not bet]


[53win/58loss.] 53win, plus 58loss=111spin taken, the spin u actually bet.


==========
so at the end u will write like this.

All 111spins, actual bet, per set.
[bet 1unit, no progression].
test for 1000set
[1set=111spin of actual bet taken]

1st set] 53w/58L

2nd set] 54w/57L

3rd] 50w/61L

4th]51w/60L

5th] 50/61L

6th] 54W/57L

7th]49/62L
-
-and so to the 1000th set.

1000th] 54/57L

..thus we can see how the  WIN/LOSE ratio going...and we can see how the WORST win/lose ratio ..

If we see that the win/lose ratio SWING very NARROW, then this strategy is
GOOD.
========================

If we see that the win/lose ratio SWING very wide, then this strategy is dangerous.


say , example

xxth] 30win/81L

yyth] 80w/31L

zzth]32win/79lose

ccth]78w/33lose

then as u see, this will cause huge winning , and huge losses!!!

AND NO PROGRESSION CAN HELP U!!!

thanks.

[RouletteGhost]

P.A, if you want result, start testing it yourself. Thanks for your interest

more spins...

5/5 Games won

[RayManZ]

BETS: 111: -1 units - 55 won - 56 lost
BETS: 111: -1 units - 55 won - 56 lost
BETS: 111: -9 units - 51 won - 60 lost
BETS: 111: -5 units - 53 won - 58 lost
BETS: 111: -3 units - 54 won - 57 lost
BETS: 111: 9 units - 60 won - 51 lost
BETS: 111: -3 units - 54 won - 57 lost
BETS: 111: -11 units - 50 won - 61 lost
BETS: 111: 7 units - 59 won - 52 lost
BETS: 111: -1 units - 55 won - 56 lost
BETS: 111: 3 units - 57 won - 54 lost
BETS: 111: 9 units - 60 won - 51 lost
BETS: 111: -13 units - 49 won - 62 lost
BETS: 111: 1 units - 56 won - 55 lost
BETS: 111: -1 units - 55 won - 56 lost
BETS: 111: -17 units - 47 won - 64 lost
BETS: 111: 15 units - 63 won - 48 lost
BETS: 111: -7 units - 52 won - 59 lost
BETS: 111: -3 units - 54 won - 57 lost
BETS: 111: 9 units - 60 won - 51 lost
BETS: 111: -11 units - 50 won - 61 lost
BETS: 111: 1 units - 56 won - 55 lost
BETS: 111: -7 units - 52 won - 59 lost
BETS: 111: 5 units - 58 won - 53 lost
BETS: 111: 1 units - 56 won - 55 lost
BETS: 111: -9 units - 51 won - 60 lost
BETS: 111: -27 units - 42 won - 69 lost
BETS: 111: 19 units - 65 won - 46 lost
BETS: 111: -13 units - 49 won - 62 lost
BETS: 111: 3 units - 57 won - 54 lost
BETS: 111: 1 units - 56 won - 55 lost
BETS: 111: -1 units - 55 won - 56 lost
BETS: 111: -5 units - 53 won - 58 lost
BETS: 111: -17 units - 47 won - 64 lost
BETS: 111: -7 units - 52 won - 59 lost
BETS: 111: 7 units - 59 won - 52 lost
BETS: 111: -5 units - 53 won - 58 lost
BETS: 111: -19 units - 46 won - 65 lost
BETS: 111: 3 units - 57 won - 54 lost
BETS: 111: 13 units - 62 won - 49 lost
BETS: 111: 3 units - 57 won - 54 lost
BETS: 111: -7 units - 52 won - 59 lost
BETS: 111: 11 units - 61 won - 50 lost
BETS: 111: 5 units - 58 won - 53 lost
BETS: 111: -15 units - 48 won - 63 lost
BETS: 111: 1 units - 56 won - 55 lost
BETS: 111: 3 units - 57 won - 54 lost
BETS: 111: -3 units - 54 won - 57 lost
BETS: 111: 7 units - 59 won - 52 lost
BETS: 111: -5 units - 53 won - 58 lost

[atlantis]

Hi Raymanz,

Phew - that was fast. Yes I think that the format that he requires.
I myself did one manual test:

flatbet @ 1u
111 BETS   56w 55L  +1

If they all came like that one or thereabouts then according to P.A by using some rules and mild progression can be made into a grail (consistent winning bet)

A.

[P.A]

Ray and A and I

delete the posts!

Discuss privately!
Make that discussion private PM, or email .among yourselves.

or else the casino begin closing door!
or change rules!!!

[leave me out.
no need to PM me]

[RouletteGhost]

Essentially when the EC switches bet for the repeat after the switch? Just want tl make sure i grasp it

R
R
B
BET black once?

As tomla suggested do all 3ECs at lnce?

[P.A]

Ignatus,
I need  t tell u this,

but down get angry at me.
for what I going to tell u.

Think hard, very hard, and u will understand.

For years u had done many test ,

but  running in a circle,
though u had run very FAR distance, u had not travel FAR.

WHY?
Because u are testing the same theory, hoping for new discovery!

And to your frustration, u, without realizing it,
same theory churn out SAME result!

Actually u had 'found' many HG at hand,
but u test it using the misunderstood formula.

Look back at all your test, and test chart for a particular test..
U only done a few, less than ten.

At first , u are DELIGHTED, when the first, 2nd, 3rd...show promising RESULTS!
They show great profit...

Then after more test , u see them going down, to negative horrible LOSSES, and U abandon the test,

and LOOK for a NEW Method to...sadly,
AGAIN, testing the same way!

U may very ANGRY when u read this, but anger will not bring WISDOM, anger will destroy u sooner than u think.

RELAX, TAKE a deep breath..
No one like to, his error, points out ,
if u flew in rage, then u will go nowhere.

think hard...
---------------------------------
no! I am not trying to make money from u.

just point out your grave error, and this save u from headache and heartache, for testing same theory again, and again!

[atlantis]

Hi RG,

You can still get long runs of losses betting an EC in such a manner; and if using dangerous progression can compound losses... So it needs to be a sensible, mild progression IMHO as PA suggests - maybe with start/stop points or even switch to different side of EC at times (when??)

I have not tried bet all 3 EC in this way either - but as  tomla pointed out, that could be interesting.

A.

[ignatus]

And to your frustration, u, without realizing it,
same theory churn out SAME result!

Actually u had 'found' many HG at hand,
but u test it using the misunderstood formula.

Look back at all your test, and test chart for a particular test..
U only done a few, less than ten.

At first , u are DELIGHTED, when the first, 2nd, 3rd...show promising RESULTS!
They show great profit...

Then after more test , u see them going down, to negative horrible LOSSES, and U abandon the test,

and LOOK for a NEW Method to...sadly,
AGAIN, testing the same way!

just point out your grave error, and this save u from headache and heartache, for testing same theory again, and again!

I'm not testing the same theory again and again, all my strategies are different.

I do 10 testsessions most of the time to see if the strategy shows good results, and yes sometimes, (many times) i have good luck first then the bad luck comes, but that is how roulette works, you win and you lose,...(you can't always win!)

i have afew strategies that i consider playable with real money.

But im more into inventing something new, than playing for real.
a new strategy that could work better than the old ones,....lately i done most tests flatbet without progression

I don't understand why you're complaining at all, saying it's all the same methods? it's not. furthermore you should be thankful for the effort i make to test the strategies when no-one else do....

[RouletteGhost]

I'm not testing the same theory again and again, all my strategies are different.

I do 10 testsessions most of the time to see if the strategy shows good results, and yes sometimes, (many times) i have good luck first then the bad luck comes,

but that is how roulette works, you win and you lose,...(you can't always win!)

i have afew strategies that i consider playable with real money.

But im more into inventing something new, than playing for real.
a new strategy that could work better than the old ones,....lately i done most tests flatbet without progression

I don't understand why you're complaining at all, saying it's all the same methods? it's not. furthermore you should be thankful for the effort i make to test the strategies when no-one else do....

Your mistake is you responded to him. Ignore him let him fade away

[ignatus]

Your mistake is you responded to him. Ignore him let him fade away

ok.. I guess you're right... 

[RouletteGhost]

Its a fugazi. Its a foogazi. Its fairy dust

link:://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OgiZNXLkf4k

In america italian slang word for FAKE is fugazi

You are always so serious. Or at least seem to be. Laugh