Thought for the day

[Chrisbis]

My thought for the day.

Over breakfast, I just wondered......

if our new concentration is based on playing a controlled EC game, using some of the principles recently seen in forum,
with a view to working "close to the edge", why don't we play ALL three EC's using the same principle?

In other words, using the methodology of the P.A. approach, and waiting for a virtual win, then a trigger,
why don't we see if the same reasoning can be put to the other EC's (Odd/Even.....High/Low) and current them simultaneously?

So, we would have....

wait for virtual win on Red:
B
B
B
RED=virtual win, get ready.
B
B...... =abort, no trigger, IN 2SPINS
B
B
B
B
RED=virtual win, get ready.
B
B...... =abort, no trigger
B
B
B
RED.....=virtual win, get ready (Remember, a Red has to appear within the next 2 spins)
B
RED=trigger!
B=bet=lose1.......-1unit
B=bet=lose2.......-2units
B=bet=lose3.......-3units
B=bet=lose4.......-4units......=Abort, 4 losses in row
B

----------------------------------------- &


wait for virtual win on Low:
H
H
H
LOW=virtual win, get ready.
H
H...... =abort, no trigger, IN 2SPINS
H
H
H
H
LOW=virtual win, get ready.
H
H...... =abort, no trigger
H
H
H
LOW.....=virtual win, get ready (Remember, a LOW has to appear within the next 2 spins)
H
LOW=trigger!
H=bet=lose1.......-1unit
H=bet=lose2.......-2units
H=bet=lose3.......-3units
H=bet=lose4.......-4units......=Abort, 4 losses in row
H

---------------------------------------- &
wait for virtual win on Even:
O
O
O
EVEN=virtual win, get ready.
O
O...... =abort, no trigger, IN 2SPINS
O
O
O
O
EVEN=virtual win, get ready.
O
O...... =abort, no trigger
O
O
O
EVEN.....=virtual win, get ready (Remember, a EVEN has to appear within the next 2 spins)
O
EVEN=trigger!
O=bet=lose1.......-1unit
O=bet=lose2.......-2units
O=bet=lose3.......-3units
O=bet=lose4.......-4units......=Abort, 4 losses in row
O

All running together.

[Chrisbis]

Edit.
Just seen RG's post on very similar topic........spooky!
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15877.msg137521#msg137521

[denzie]

What progression?

[Chrisbis]

Try them all shall we.
Something slow and steady I think.
Maybe GLC could have a look.

I would treat each EC as though it had a separate bank, and monitor each one on its own merit.
Could even, say, set a Win stop point (and equally a Lose stop limit) on each of the EC's, and when you have achieved that
limit, stop betting on that EC and concentrate on the remain EC's.

A global limit could also be set, and it could even be achieved by just ONE or TWO of the EC's if the other(s)
have not had sufficient trigger points to begin betting, as in P.A.'s example above.

[RayManZ]

I did this. Not this bet selection but the bet selection posted by alantis.

The main problem is the progression.

The best solution in my eyes is to use a progression on all 6 EC's. Not 6 seperate progressions but just one. That way you can profit when a EC hits and other dont.

The problem is, what kind of progression is good here? Best of 5 is difficult because sometimes the progression will overlap. your bets are not the same every spin.

If someone can think of a good progression for this we might have a winner.

[denzie]

What about P.A. his progression? 
What are the odds all 3 ec's having the RFH ? Of course it's possible. But we need a good MM here