Hey Guys,
You can see and copy 1 million spins data of American(0-00) wheel from this link:
link:://wizardofodds.com/roulette/roulette-sim.html (link:://wizardofodds.com/roulette/roulette-sim.html)
These spins were created using a Mersenne Twister random number generator. The results are based on a double-zero wheel. For a single-zero wheel, simply ignore the 26,432 double-zero outcomes.
Al/Sumi
U just can't say.............. "For a single-zero wheel, simply ignore the 26,432 double-zero outcomes."
Because they are completely different wheels, an thus/hence would derive completely different neighbour results of sequenced numbers.!!
:-[
Its just not that simple my friend!! :wink:
(are u blonde by any chance?) :P
Just pulling Ur leg. :twisted:
keep up the good section work.
All much appreciated. :thumbsup:
Buddy Chris,
You need to be educated about RNGs a little. There is nothing like sectors or neighbours in RNG. Haha, you pulled your leg instead of mine. ;)
Thanks for the heads-up dear Albalaha. (link:://rouletteforum.cc/Themes/smFox/images/post/thumbup.gif)
Appreciated.
One million RNG spins?
Why?
That becomes rather pointless after the first 16,000 or so.
And I'll agree with Chrisbis on the "remove the 00 to get a 0 wheel result." Two different wheels !!!!
AD
Adulay,
It is RNG and there is nothing like location of numbers in RNG as in cases of Real wheel. So, a 00 is just another number. I hope you can understand it now.
Quote from: albalaha on May 05, 10:43 PM 2011
Adulay,
It is RNG and there is nothing like location of numbers in RNG as in cases of Real wheel. So, a 00 is just another number. I hope you can understand it now.
Oh yeah. I understand it.
AD
Why would you want sample data using RNG data?
The whole point of testing is to see outliers, possible streaks and possible patterns. For instance on an American wheel the second and third column are grouped together in bigger bunches (both have a group of four from its own column) while the first column is spread out.
Does that mean the first column has more or less streaks? Can't tell that with RNG data
Quote from: albalaha on Apr 13, 02:24 AM 2011
The results are based on a double-zero wheel. For a single-zero wheel, simply ignore the 26,432 double-zero outcomes.[/size]
I'm not as knowledgeable as some of the people here, but that didn't look right even to me. Doing it that way, there's no way the math could add up