As promised ...... My collected treasures. I will present special delicacies separately to the best of my knowledge. :thumbsup:
It takes time to test, so I can't give an appointment.
If anyone finds a piece of gold ....................... Please post .... THANK YOU. :love: :love:
Wow.... wow!!! :love:
I will see if I have anything that is not in your collection... but from the looks of it... you had everything!!
Thank you @Austria
I am pleased..
That is the point of a roulette forum to give each other advice and action. If other RX users also want to contribute ... Thanks in advance ... :wink:
Quote from: Austria on Mar 06, 06:48 AM 2021
As promised ...... My collected treasures. I will present special delicacies separately to the best of my knowledge. :thumbsup:
It takes time to test, so I can't give an appointment.
If anyone finds a piece of gold ....................... Please post .... THANK YOU. :love: :love:
thank you very much!
Lucomenda is the best so far. Maybe needs some adjustments, but it's very good...
@Serendipity
Yes you are right. I installed the RX System Designer twice. RX 1 all spins are played and with RX 2 I reset after every plus. Amazingly, RX 1 and RX 2 generate different set signals after the first reset of RX 2.
Probably this code is responsible for it:
// act when not qualified
if flag "qualified" false begin
if record"Spins"data = 25 begin
Try it out ..... usually the first set signal is after 25 spins ....... in my tests it was sometimes> 30 spins.
Anyway ... the longer you play, the more dangerous it gets.
I've already dropped to over - 1000 units twice before I did
but still achieved a plus ...
If interested, I can upload the permanents.
@Austria
yeah, i've been playing with this system for hours now... still cant get the right setting. Well, you cannot balance the whole thing, but trying to get the most of it. I think the key is not to go too far with progression (12 steps by default), even though it recovers almost all the time, I think there's something special about this system.
keep in touch!
@Austria
Yes if you can upload your changes to Lucomenda, that would be fantastic...
What do you think of Trojans Tricycle system?? drawdowns too much?? its another one that does perform well....
I had tried it with the rx bot some time ago, one thing i did notice was that the unit size goes 1 unit then 1.02, 1.06, 1.3, 2units.. etc
so it does not jump whole units eg 1unit 2unit 3unit........ so if playing live with the bot the results could be slightly different. not sure if its something in the coding?
But yes Lucomenda is probably the best system in the bunch, sadly i cant find much more information about it other than from VLS. Hermes was the one that made some good modifications to it and does not appear he is on the forums anymore
Now its in your hands @AUSTRIA. :thumbsup:
During one of the last updates from RX System Designer, the units 0,1 were added. Tried to change that via OPTIONS> Betting Options> Chip Currency, unfortunately without success.
I classify TROJAN TRICYCLE as dangerous because it has fixed sentences in the dozen ... Please be careful when playing. TROJAN SQUARE has better chances of profit. Both Codes are ident. (with or without DoubleWheel)
Apache's HGF would also be worth a test. The problem with codes with variable parameters is if you lose and change the parameters you win. With the same parameters you lose the next time. But it is worthwhile if you google THE HOLY GRAIL FORMULA.
I'm wondering... Is there a chance that you could play 2 or 3 systems at once, because you cannot open multiple instances of Rx software to test. Maybe you could reach your daily goal, just playing fewer spins.
Just a thought...
Quote from: Austria on Mar 09, 04:23 AM 2021Apache's HGF would also be worth a test. The problem with codes with variable parameters is if you lose and change the parameters you win. With the same parameters you lose the next time. But it is worthwhile if you google THE HOLY GRAIL FORMULA.
It's better with variable parameters, because you can always find a fix somehow, when it's fixed, you can't do anything, ever, so i keep testing those files. HGF seems also pretty interesting.
Quote from: Serendipity on Mar 09, 07:05 AM 2021
I'm wondering... Is there a chance that you could play 2 or 3 systems at once, because you cannot open multiple instances of Rx software to test. Maybe you could reach your daily goal, just playing fewer spins.
Just a thought...
Ok ... I install RX again, but change the folder name ... Then I have 2 RX icons and two windows where I play two systems in parallel.
Quote from: Serendipity on Mar 09, 09:16 AM 2021
It's better with variable parameters, because you can always find a fix somehow, when it's fixed, you can't do anything, ever, so i keep testing those files. HGF seems also pretty interesting.
Another big topic is KIMO LI MATRIX. For tinkerers, I would recommend the matrix fusion systems.
What I forgot .... On the UX homepage under Systems you can also find PDF files. It is well worth google KIMO LI MATRIX .
I googled for KIMO LI MATRIX myself.
I played two systems myself.
Kimo li matrix from UX homepage incl. Pdf and a contribution from this forum: link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=7719.0
You can find the RX code 7719-soggett in the folder: RX_Codes _ # _ to_A :thumbsup:
I have found a few more wisdoms, I hope not to break any rule: link:s://:.kimoliroulette.com/a-collection-of-thoughts.html
They are really worth reading. :xd:
Thanks for your contribution. I did try kimo's systems, well, most of them, and don't know why, but didn't manage to find any winning settings, more than that, progression seems too aggressive, not my style, I keep searching...
These are exactly my experiences. I dare say the UX version is the best. Purists can test the hungarian versions. >:D >:D
then, it must be me to blame here :) the fact is that when I try K Li systems, they lose 8 out 10 sessions, more than that, i'm not passing 200 spins on either of them :))
i'm moving forward
Quote from: Serendipity on Mar 10, 04:40 AM 2021
then, it must be me to blame here :) the fact is that when I try K Li systems, they lose 8 out 10 sessions, more than that, i'm not passing 200 spins on either of them :))
i'm moving forward
That interests me. I play in two online casinos ... win2day.at (only for Austrian players. State licensed) and CasinoClub. Both casinos have different results with ten RNG sessions and the same system.
RANDOM or does every casino have its own RNG generator ???
Which casino do you play?
i have many files with so called live spins, but i cannot tell for sure, but i mostly use what rx software give me (rng also i guess)
I have experimented with the values in line 75 (xxxx) and line 77 (xxx). According to my tests, these are good values.
To prove this, use my TEST-SPINS. >:D >:D >:D
Quote from: Austria on Mar 12, 05:37 AM 2021
I have experimented with the values in line 75 (xxxx) and line 77 (xxx). According to my tests, these are good values.
To prove this, use my TEST-SPINS. >:D >:D >:D
Good work @Austria
You seemed to have reduced the drawdowns... definitely would need to bot this.
These are live spins and you can see the original vs your modified version.
I have tried with different live data it seems to do over 10,000 spins then drops off but the drawdowns in between are managable
YES .... really good ....
I've been playing with the modification since March 1st.
So far, I've always been in the PLUS.
My game approx. 45 min playing time (approx. 500 spins RNG)
0.10 EUR stake. :love: :love:
I just played this SESSION (RNG won 10 EUR).
Again there is a clear difference between v333 and MODIFIED.
@Serendipity
Your problem is solved ... :twisted:
At KIMO LI, I reduced the waiting time to 18 spins
and the first time you win, session stop is activated. You have surely noticed that after a long playing time all the capital is gone.
Thanks alot. I will test your idea, but definitely it's better than what I achieved. It's true, after playing hundreds of spins, my bankroll was gone all the time. Thank you once again. Keep in touch.
@SERENDIPITY
That is the spirit of a community with the best knowledge to help ... Or at least to believe it. :xd:
I check every code and consider whether there is another way, then I test both variants with 50 RNG of the software and my saved sessions. Only then do I risk real money. :sad2: :sad2:
There is a saying in Austria: "Lieber den Spatz in der Hand als die Taube am Dach." ;D ;D ;D
That's why I like to play short sessions, and if things go negative I stop because a small loss is quickly made up for.
The test of the RX code shows me what I can risk.