• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Pigeonhole Revisited/Out of the box reference

Started by MoneyT101, Nov 02, 09:34 PM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Kattila

***
Or you're expressing an opinion or belief of some sort ? ***

I am expressing my personal opinion and experience (real play ) , not sure
if ths could work in the very long run, but for xx xxx spins yes works.

MoneyT101

Quote from: cht on Nov 05, 06:32 AM 2017
POS has to have a reason why they demonstrate this order, not based on some voodooish assumptions unless whatever universal claim can be backed up with empirical evidence. Or you're expressing an opinion or belief of some sort ?

The purpose of latest tech advances is basically to randomnise outcomes with physical intrusion mid-spin that's legal. How is this supposed order claim possible when such intervention is activated in actual live money play if need be for the operator ?

Does anyone have spins from one of these new devices?  I would like to see how much their manipulation affects everything.
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

maestro

QuoteThe purpose of latest tech advances is basically to randomnise outcomes with physical intrusion mid-spin that's legal. How is this supposed order claim possible when such intervention is activated in actual live money play if need be for the operator ?


where can we read about it to see how good it is..thx
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

psimoes

RRS is only a problem for VB players.
If your method doesn't rely on AP then a wheel with RRS is as much of  a threat as a wheel without. At the end of the day it's all random.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

maestro

if RRS can be on and of at certain times then means that random stream as whole will be injected with certain numbers and this is not good for the player will be same as hit the number to make person lose so will be totaly random and in other hand too negative for player
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

psimoes

They don't have any control over which number is about to be injected in the random flow. If they had, it would be illegal just like the number 22 in Rick's casino.
You can't predict the number that's about to hit? Like you could before!
It' s still random, with or without RRS.
If it injects somekind of a pattern then it can be exploited.
If it removes a pattern where there once was, it's still exploitable. The lack of a pattern is a pattern.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

psimoes

Don't take that last sentence seriously.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

maestro

Quote“No, it was not the money that I valuedâ€"what I wanted was to make all this mob of Heintzes, hotel proprietors, and fine ladies of Baden talk about me, recount my story, wonder at me, extol my doings, and worship my winnings.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Gambler

i like this one..hope you read the book
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

psimoes

I read it, yes. Things haven't changed much since the 19th century.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

MoneyT101

Quote from: psimoes on Nov 05, 08:50 AM 2017
If it injects somekind of a pattern then it can be exploited.
If it removes a pattern where there once was, it's still exploitable. The lack of a pattern is a pattern.

I agree!!! 

That's why I want to see some spins

There will always be patterns.  Especially in the game of roulette where one number has different groups it belongs to!

You can win somewhere
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

cht

Quote from: psimoes on Nov 05, 08:50 AM 2017
They don't have any control over which number is about to be injected in the random flow. If they had, it would be illegal just like the number 22 in Rick's casino.
You can't predict the number that's about to hit? Like you could before!
It' s still random, with or without RRS.
If it injects somekind of a pattern then it can be exploited.
If it removes a pattern where there once was, it's still exploitable. The lack of a pattern is a pattern.
Problem with this pattern or non-pattern is it's a here and now thing, it's fluid and they change as and when. That's why their operational protocol once known is vulnerable. But it takes a lot of work to map their rotation. Is it worth it ?

psimoes

Probably less effort than what's required to detect a biased wheel.
[Math+1] beats a Math game

poobear

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Nov 04, 06:34 AM 2017
Dyksexlic...!!


Now, using just one set of 37 RANDOM WORDS would be difficult enough, but supposing we added a 'CONTINUAL' SECOND data stream of random words (composed of the 37 original word 'VOCABULARY' data set) and fed them into a roulette table composed of the FIRST set (to act as our roulette 'SPIN' event) !

Would it be possible for any roulette 'System' to be able to take the SECOND data stream of words and accurately PREDICT the correct relevance of each of the 37 place holders (roulette table bets) BEFORE 1 of the words REPEATS ? - thus ORDERING them into a COHERENT English Sentence that used the 37 WORDS in the CORRECT order.

Now the 'CHANCES' of being able to do this are so high, that no computer in the world could POSSIBLY calculate the odds. If I used a machine to create the second data stream of roulette 'SPIN' words, I could be accused by 'EXPERTS' of cheating. So I thought of a better solution. Supposing I took words (which could be found on the original 37 word roulette (table') from forum posts (in the order they were posted) to act as 'RANDOM' spin events ?

Could anyone then accuse me of cheating ? I didn't choose the 'spin' words myself, did I ?

Hi Mel,

So, I have taken one of your paragraphs with 37 words and rearranged the words while trying to keep the grammar correct -

"I'm telling you that you can create a situation in which you can, using this concept.  I'm speaking from experience.  Now it's not perfect I play to many numbers for my taste but it can't lose!  Mathematically! "

The same words but different sentences -

"I’m not now telling you that I’m perfect, It’s from a mathematically speaking situation. You can taste this numbers experience in which I play, but you can’t create my concept using too many, for it may lose."

So now we have the same 37 words/numbers but different ordering, what is the relevance?

MoneyT101

I'm still working on dyksexlic version honestly.

I play a similar idea I created using the theory

Let's say first spin is 21

I enter the number into my sheet and that converts to dynamic stream.  Which in turn creates a parallel stream

Now based on my two streams I know exactly where my repeats are.

So what happens more then repeats? 

But I can't play just for that I need a combination of it.

So this is where the magic happens! I'm not trying to predict who wins because that would be stupid!  I just want to win more then I lose.

Here are my results...

WL25%.....LW 25%
WW 25%
LL 25%

I decided what makes me win and what makes me lose. 
Simple once you get it!  Chased all the pigeons away and they were already in their hole

stringbeanpc

Quote from: MoneyT101 on Nov 06, 01:20 AM 2017
I enter the number into my sheet and that converts to dynamic stream.  Which in turn creates a parallel stream

As I understand, the dynamic stream is the order of winning numbers like this

1st  position - most recent winning number
2nd position - 2nd most recent winning number
3rd position - 3rd most recent winning number
and so on

What I do not understand is the term "parallel stream" ?

-