• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Progression bets are nothing more than different size bets on different spins. You could get lucky and win big, or unlucky and lose even more.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

PROMISED CONSTANT WINNING BET

Started by F_LAT_INO, Jun 25, 03:19 PM 2010

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Droganson on Nov 27, 06:34 PM 2010
I am afraid I don't quite get what I'm seeing in Book4. I wonder if someone could clarify it for me? It looks like recent with the same rules? Am I missing something?
[/quote

Recents with 2 //could be more/virtual wins--and next lose you start betting onremaining
4 sectors.

yellov=recents with strict rules,after 2 virtual loses...start betting.


both bets with progression 1,2,4,8,16
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

marivo

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 28, 05:47 AM 2010
Quote from: Droganson on Nov 27, 06:34 PM 2010
I am afraid I don't quite get what I'm seeing in Book4. I wonder if someone could clarify it for me? It looks like recent with the same rules? Am I missing something?
[/quote

Recents with 2 //could be more/virtual wins--and next lose you start betting onremaining
4 sectors.

yellov=recents with strict rules,after 2 virtual loses...start betting.


both bets with progression 1,2,4,8,16

OK. Thanks for that explanation. I will check it again too.

chrisbis

@ Ophis

Just had awful game Ophis. (not Ur fault, only mine!!)

........................................... and the tracker did not give me one bet selection in 67 spins?

Is this possible or a bug to fix too?

Your loving fellow- Chrisbis

[attachimg=#]

chrisbis

@ F LAT INO.

Is that Ur picture in the avatar Flat?
Nice fellow if it is.

No more flag eh!!

Nice picture, very nice picture.

Maybe everyone should do the same, and post up their face for christmas!!

I think George maybe next?

marivo

Quote from: F_LAT_INO on Nov 28, 05:47 AM 2010
Quote from: Droganson on Nov 27, 06:34 PM 2010
I am afraid I don't quite get what I'm seeing in Book4. I wonder if someone could clarify it for me? It looks like recent with the same rules? Am I missing something?
[/quote

Recents with 2 //could be more/virtual wins--and next lose you start betting onremaining
4 sectors.

yellov=recents with strict rules,after 2 virtual loses...start betting.


both bets with progression 1,2,4,8,16

I just played a game by this rules and made +308 in 188 spins. Never reached progression 16. If I would have been playing under rules MOD5 it would have been +144 and would have gone down as much as -468. I attach history and graph for MOD5.

chrisbis

At -468, would U not have gone bust,

or certainly not able to make Ur next bet,

since if U had a starting BR of say 500,

at -468, U don't have another 8units to make the next 8 sector/split bets? ?

marivo

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 28, 06:55 PM 2010
At -468, would you not have gone bust,

or certainly not able to make your next bet,

since if you had a starting BR of say 500,

at -468, you don't have another 8units to make the next 8 sector/split bets? ?


I played under new rules of F LAT INO!

GLC

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 28, 06:19 PM 2010
@ F LAT INO.

Is that your picture in the avatar Flat?
Nice fellow if it is.

No more flag eh!!

Nice picture, very nice picture.

Maybe everyone should do the same, and post up their face for christmas!!

I think George maybe next?

Chris,

I'm trying to grace all with a mug shot, but still having trouble.  I don't have any paint type programs.  All my pictures are saved in the wrong format.

I sent Victor a mug shot and he's going to try to post it for me when he gets time.

It's a good idea Flat suggested, putting up a photo of ourselves.

Makes it a little more personal.

George

P.S.  Bingo.  Victor just came through.  Thanks VLS
In my case it doesn't matter.  I'm both!

Droganson

Has anyone gotten the chance to further test 4 recents with no rules? F_LAT_INO greatly intrigued me when he mentioned it did well for him but I am reluctant to do my own testing until further testing has been done. I apologize for my gratuitous use of the word test.

chrisbis

Mooooorning All......................Coke-A-Doodle 2 everyone this fine November day.

Would it be possible for the esteemed  F LAT INO, to quickly post up here,

a revised version of the rules? (not the excell sheet version)

An absolute set of rules.

Think things are getting a little lost in Translation here,

and it will give Ophis time to fix the trackers drive system-  think its got a puncture!

I will be still using the tracker, but prob use one of the older versions, that be found way back (around pages 19-26) since they still work incredibility well.

This is just my Ten Pennith on the subject.

Twisteruk

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 29, 02:41 AM 2010
Mooooorning All......................Coke-A-Doodle 2 everyone this fine November day.

Would it be possible for the esteemed  F LAT INO, to quickly post up here,

a revised version of the rules? (not the excell sheet version)

An absolute set of rules.

Think things are getting a little lost in Translation here,

and it will give Ophis time to fix the trackers drive system-  think its got a puncture!

I will be still using the tracker, but prob use one of the older versions, that be found way back (around pages 19-26) since they still work incredibility well.

This is just my Ten Pennith on the subject.

Yep spot on Chris !

Im a little lost as to what the "Final Rules" are too  :-\

Lets hope ophis understands them and puts them into the Tracker  :)
Its Set In Stone =)

marivo

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 29, 02:41 AM 2010
Mooooorning All......................Coke-A-Doodle 2 everyone this fine November day.

Would it be possible for the esteemed  F LAT INO, to quickly post up here,

a revised version of the rules? (not the excell sheet version)

An absolute set of rules.

Think things are getting a little lost in Translation here,

and it will give Ophis time to fix the trackers drive system-  think its got a puncture!

I will be still using the tracker, but prob use one of the older versions, that be found way back (around pages 19-26) since they still work incredibility well.

This is just my Ten Pennith on the subject.


F LAT INO said:

"Recents with 2 //could be more/virtual wins--and next lose you start betting onremaining
4 sectors.

yellov=recents with strict rules,after 2 virtual loses...start betting.


both bets with progression 1,2,4,8,16"



Its clear, isn't it?!

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 28, 06:19 PM 2010
@ F LAT INO.

Is that your picture in the avatar Flat?
Nice fellow if it is.

No more flag eh!!

Nice picture, very nice picture.

Maybe everyone should do the same, and post up their face for christmas!!

I think George maybe next?
Ye.Younger then me only 4 months.At least you feel.
you are talking with somebody

You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: chrisbis on Nov 29, 02:41 AM 2010
Mooooorning All......................Coke-A-Doodle 2 everyone this fine November day.

Would it be possible for the esteemed  F LAT INO, to quickly post up here,

a revised version of the rules? (not the excell sheet version)

An absolute set of rules.

Think things are getting a little lost in Translation here,

and it will give Ophis time to fix the trackers drive system-  think its got a puncture!

I will be still using the tracker, but prob use one of the older versions, that be found way back (around pages 19-26) since they still work incredibility well.

This is just my Ten Pennith on the subject.

Hi Chris,
You ask me to explain the new version????
If so will do it later afternoon/must sleep some after the lunch/
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Droganson on Nov 29, 02:31 AM 2010
Has anyone gotten the chance to further test 4 recents with no rules? F_LAT_INO greatly intrigued me when he mentioned it did well for him but I am reluctant to do my own testing until further testing has been done. I apologize for my gratuitous use of the word test.
Do well only on airball machine.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

-