Well in talking in these rooms one person likes to wait for 4 dozen in a row
where one dozen doesn't show up, and then bet that dozen the next 4 spins.
Works quite a bit, but not really.
So as I'm testing this the simple fact that it doesn't come in, or that the other
2 keep coming in gets my attention.
So simply put, wait the 4 decisions for a missing dozen and bet against it coming in.
It often does come in. But NOT 3-4 in a row!!!!!!! So there is your double dozen method.
I'm sure it can be cleaned up or added to.
It's funny, but so often we wait for a missing thing and then play for it. This is
the opposite.
Can we get 100 pages out of this?
I like such methods, will do some test later. Thank you!
Looks like this: link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15260.25 - reply 25
Quote from: celescliff on Feb 22, 04:13 PM 2016
Looks like this: link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15260.25 - reply 25
I'm going with "YES". Looks familiar,
I didn't suggest the rolling basis. Guess I was focusing on the sleeper
not coming back.
Man 1 Have BALLS. Just play " Follow the Dozens". It is S.O.S..
Quote from: mogul397 on Feb 22, 04:42 PM 2016
I'm going with "YES". Looks familiar,
Looks very familiar...GLC, Two Cat Sam, Ego, Atlantis. :question:
I think AMK was onto something
Similar to what turbo genius had done and similar to celes cliffs link post #25
AMK method: OPPOSITE.
If 1312 bet against 2131 with a 1 3 9 27 progression. Stupid progression but hey if your gonna gamble.....
So bet against the opposite
1132 now bet against 2311
On any win sit out remaining spins, THEN let another series of 4 occur then attack again
1
3
2
2
Now bet against 2231
2 L
1 W (we won sit out next 2)
Virtual
Virtual
Now let a new series evolve
Virtual
Virtual
Virtual
Virtual
Begin again
I say hit and run or take a break. Math guys say taking a break means nothing. Well when you take a break you have to place your left hand on your head and slap the right hand on the leg three times. Then it works
If money wasnt a thing id do this once a day with $100 units. But then again if i had that kinda money where id risk 100 with a 1 3 9 27 i probably wouldnt be gamblin' . id be enjoying the money elsewhere
Didnt mean to hijack
Carry on
And i will test @mogul
Mogul
I'd like to give you props for this
looks good
QuoteSo simply put, wait the 4 decisions for a missing dozen and bet against it coming in.
It often does come in. But NOT 3-4 in a row!!!!!!! So there is your double dozen method.
I'm sure it can be cleaned up or added to.
heres a quick zumma test
now something like this is good, you can walk around the tables and just jump in on the dozens when the trigger comes (yes math boys i said triggers).
waiting should not be too long.
1
2
1
3
3
1 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 2)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
2
1
3
1
3 (2 absent past 4 soins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
1
1
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
3 (1 absent past 4 spins, bet 2 and 3)
2 1-1 WIN
2
3
0
1
3
1
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
0 1-1 LOSE
1 3-3 WIN
1
3
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
0 3-3 LOSE
3 9-9 WIN
2
3
2 (1 absent past 4 sins, bet 2 and 3)
1 1-1 LOSE
2 3-3 WIN
more investigation needed
insurance on 0......
about 1 hours worth of bets above
walk around with a whiskey, float around place the bets when you see the trigger
Quote from: Tamino on Feb 22, 05:08 PM 2016
Man 1 Have BALLS. Just play " Follow the Dozens". It is S.O.S..
Well it's not that simple. And if anyone has BALLS here, it's me. I call a spade a spade,
and don't insult anyone when I say what I see. It's just offering opinions or information about
how I see the methods work.
The truth of it is that it is similar. But not exact. And regardless of what I originally posted I'd
like to offer an update. (I feel like this is close)
So
1)you wait for the 4 in a row where one dozen is missing.
2)You play for that missing dozen to not appear next roll.
i'd say that's it. BUT.
3) I think that you should possibly play a 1,3,9 progression against
that dozen for completion.
4) From there, you WAIT until you see the dozen, then get another trigger.
WAIT
5) I sometimes feel compelled to play against the number as lost. I feel like
that doesn't work more than it does.....
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 22, 06:41 PM 2016
Mogul
I'd like to give you props for this
looks good
RG, thanks for explaining that AMK method. I tried reading the thread and it
seemed all over the place. Makes sense now.
Not sure I like the 27 unit bet. Kind of close quarters.
Quote from: RouletteGhost on Feb 22, 06:50 PM 2016
heres a quick zumma test
now something like this is good, you can walk around the tables and just jump in on the dozens when the trigger comes (yes math boys i said triggers).
waiting should not be too long.
1
2
1
3
3
1 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 2)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
2
1
3
1
3 (2 absent past 4 soins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
1
1
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
3 3-3 WIN
3 (1 absent past 4 spins, bet 2 and 3)
2 1-1 WIN
2
3
0
1
3
1
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
0 1-1 LOSE
1 3-3 WIN
1
3
3 (2 absent past 4 spins, bet 1 and 3)
2 1-1 LOSE
0 3-3 LOSE
3 9-9 WIN
2
3
2 (1 absent past 4 sins, bet 2 and 3)
1 1-1 LOSE
2 3-3 WIN
more investigation needed
insurance on 0......
about 1 hours worth of bets above
walk around with a whiskey, float around place the bets when you see the trigger
Thing about this is that, the original method says to play the 2-1 choice the next bet.
I have found that when it is hitting, it hits. And that was the original method. But
when it is not, it is not. As you show, it was hitting.
A little more ammo related to sitting out bad times for the skeptics?
Quote from: Tamino on Feb 22, 05:08 PM 2016
Man 1 Have BALLS. Just play " Follow the Dozens". It is S.O.S..
I've been doing the opposite. I'm betting against last dozen. But with a parlay.
Doz 1 shows ...bet doz 2 -3
Doz 2 shows ...bet doz 1-3
Doz 3 shows ...bet doz 1 -2
If get a repeat I wait till that ends and go in again
1....2-3
3....1-2
1....2-3
1...no bet
1...no bet
3...bet 1-2
We parlay till in profit and then reset it.
1-1 , 1-1, 2-2, 3-3, 4-4, 5-5, 8-8, 12-12 , ........
Have you looked at dont knock it till you try it in real roulette spins?
Two dozens are always a good bet selection no matter how you slice the mustard.
Quote from: nottophammer on Feb 28, 10:26 AM 2016
Have you looked at dont knock it till you try it in real roulette spins?
I'm did a bit. But then KTF got all my attention lately. I should try it some more...under what section is it ? Can't seem to find it anymore
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16427
So heres Dont knock it
spin #span doz doz-doz to bet +1/-1 stake return total out total return Running total
1 20 2
2 32 3 1-3 1-1 2 3 2 3 1
3 16 2 1-2 1-1 2 3 4 6 2
4 12 1 1-3 1-1 2 3 6 9 3
5 26 3 2-3 1-1 2 3 8 12 4
6 32 3 1-2 1-1 2 0 10 12 2
7 3 1 1-2 2-2 4 6 14 18 4
Now back to previous high. So do you stop?
So we parley the win
spin #span doz doz-doz to bet +1/-1 stake return total out total return Running total
1 20 2
2 32 3 1-3 1-1 2 3 2 3 1
3 16 2 1-2 1-1 2 3 4 6 2
4 12 1 1-3 1-1 2 3 6 9 3
5 26 3 2-3 1-1 2 3 8 12 4
6 32 3 1-2 1-1 2 0 10 12 2
7 3 1 1-2 2-2 4 6 14 18 4
8 2 1 2-3 2-2 4 0 18 18 0
9 31 3 2-3 3-3 6 9 24 27 3
10 19 2 1-2 3-3 6 9 30 36 6
We parley the win spin 8 lose, up 1 to 3-3 win, parley the win on spin 10, new high,
Now the ? do we drop too 2-2 or back to 1-1, you need a decision
well if we drop -1 parley
spin #span doz doz-doz to bet +1/-1 stake return total out total return Running total
1 20 2
2 32 3 1-3 1-1 2 3 2 3 1
3 16 2 1-2 1-1 2 3 4 6 2
4 12 1 1-3 1-1 2 3 6 9 3
5 26 3 2-3 1-1 2 3 8 12 4
6 32 3 1-2 1-1 2 0 10 12 2
7 3 1 1-2 2-2 4 6 14 18 4
8 2 1 2-3 2-2 4 0 18 18 0
9 31 3 2-3 3-3 6 9 24 27 3
10 19 2 1-2 3-3 6 9 30 36 6
11 2 1 1-3 2-2
12 16 2 2-3 2-2
13 35 3 1-3 1-1
14 9 1 1-2 1-1
would be good