• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

P.A :PREACHING about HG!

Started by P.A, Sep 03, 10:54 PM 2015

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

petespin

hi all , well after my weekly vacation ,iam here again , i know many of u dont like that ,but...all the previous days i ve seen so many things that i support like pa does in his threads , i like to say that i agree with the most of his claims , but i want to state about variance , and i ask u do u ever wonder that what u call variance sometimes causes by cheating? if u dont get my point iam refering about dealers and how can change the spin outcome , this is the no 1 factor for me before even go and play in the casino, how to avoid cheating by the dealer ,now u dont tell me that its a very rare event , no its a very common one , and has to do with practice ,like every other thing in life , let me tell u that in my neighbor i see every day an old man [more than 75] to turn his back in the basket and shoot and guess what? in 90% thier shoots ending succesfull !! now think a young person what can do everything its about practice dont be fooled, anyway there are books [like r.renos] that speak about whole this , saying that u CAN NOT create any grail without taking  seriously these claims , i ve seen guys that try to bet on 12 no sectors [ and ive done itmyself in the past!] well u leave 2 other 12 no sectors and its very easy for the dealer to shoot where u have no bet ! am i wrong at any point ? i really like to hear PA opinion about it as he started all these .  :smile:

denzie

Quote from: P.A on Sep 07, 09:05 AM 2015
Denzie,
111 is just for testing purpose..for testing whether a bet selection, stable or wide swinging..
please read slowly and carefully to avoid confusion.
==============================
Gentlemen,
below a table of 'what if',
STRICTLY only, for the GAME 50win/100spins...
dont confuse...

and then, after reading this table,
the  newbie will soon understand how to bet the 50w/100 riddle GAME.!!!


[and then try to win the game 30win/100spin riddle game.]


The Table, below is STRICTLY, for the riddle GAME of [50win, in 100spins].

hope u understand...dont confuse, this just game, for u to understand how to avoid variance.
===============================

how to EASILY beat the [50win, in 100spins] riddle game.,..,
with at least 1u win...by waiting,for...

That's what i wanted to hear...
Thx Wong...
My eureka has arrived. ...
As spins roll off our predictions get better

1eleven

Quote from: P.A on Sep 06, 09:31 AM 2015

The 111spins is just for testing your bet selection purpose,
why 111?
Because 37numbers of roulette, times three=111, has 3 zero probability, then , easy to understand...and see the edge %

sorry for the misunderstanding...blame my English!

Happy to see I (1eleven) could inspire you, P.A/Kimo. 

And no, your English has nothing to do with it.

P.A

oh dear....
Oh dear...
oh dear...

Ok , first thing first.

1] I am no 'accomplice" of Mr.Petespin.
I never PM, or email, or whatsoever, in any communication, with Petespin.

when I first comment on Petespins reply on my others thread topic, weeks ago, I dumbfounded when someone accused me of sort of 'accomplice' with him, [by someone I respected]. Only after I read about his 'posting' and 'warning' on forums...then only I feel sorry for myself for not reading his posting earlier.

2]Petespin has the right to post any where he likes, and I cant protest his presence here.
BUT, no...! Please dont say and accuse me a scammer or anything like that and start war of word, and the last thing I want is this thread locked, or deleted...

I had promised the respected TURNER, this is my LAST topic, before I disappear for good.

3]Hi Petespins,
with respect.

My preaching here is BASED ON FACTS THAT MATH BOYS CANNOT DISPUTE!!!
So, if u want to discuss, anything, that based on MATH, that cant be disputable, by the respected math boys, then u are very welcome.

and I cant comment on anything that based on 'physic', or  cheating dealer 'perception'.

May u please start your own thread, with topic of DEALER's...cheat.
I believe u will have many readers.
Thanks.



P.A

Quote from: 1eleven on Sep 07, 09:28 AM 2015
Happy to see I (1eleven) could inspire you, P.A/Kimo. 

And no, your English has nothing to do with it.
Welcome 1-11

with respect.

For once and for all,
I need to tell, I am Wong, I am a Chinese, from a small country,
in  Asia...GMT+8

Kimo Li is in the USA.
[The respected Turner can prove this.]

and please, dont start a war, here.

I will disappear forever, when I complete my preaching here.
Thanks.

6th-sense

Quote from: atlantis on Sep 07, 06:41 AM 2015
Hi 6th-sense,
For a test I tried the PA "wonderland" casino riddle with its FLATBET 50/50 rules and whatnot.
I got the +7 OK. IMHO, was a good result.
A.
i was not taking the mickey...that is a good result i meant by big ones actual big money...if you solve it and flat bet your basebet can be large....

1eleven

Quote from: P.A on Sep 07, 09:42 AM 2015
Welcome 1-11

with respect.

For once and for all,
I need to tell, I am Wong, I am a Chinese, from a small country,
in  Asia...GMT+8

Kimo Li is in the USA.
[The respected Turner can prove this.]

and please, dont start a war, here.

I will disappear forever, when I complete my preaching here.
Thanks.

Right, because IP spoofing is really difficult these days.

No proof needed.  It's clear as day. 

The war should be against the casino, not others.
The focus should be profit made from the CASINO, not others. 

So, stop pretending like you 'know' something others do not. 

POOF.  Disappear, my friend.  Game over.



atlantis

Quote from: 6th-sense on Sep 07, 09:50 AM 2015
    i was not taking the mickey...that is a good result i meant by big ones actual big money...if you solve it and flat bet your basebet can be large....

Hi 6th-sense,
I never thought that you were taking the mickey anyway. :)
Of course... Sure. Flatbet can be larger if you wish.
(In the 30/70 game you probably use a mild progression)

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

petespin

i want to assure anyone here , iam not related with PA , simply we both have similar ideas as how roulette can be beaten ... thats all , the most important factor of course is variance ,i always beleived so  well also i ve speak about expectation , and iam pleasant to see that PA based his claims on this one ! lets see now variance and expectation , yes its a deadly combination !  p.s every time i try to post someone else does the same ! so popular thread!

Turner

Elleven
If you have doubts about members locations in the world contact the mods or report the post. Let us deal with it. Dont bring accusations into the posts.
All your guessing is wrong. PA is from Malysia and Kimo Lee is USA.......consistantly.

1eleven

Maybe I wasn't clear.   REMOVE MY ACCOUNT, not the last post.

Turner

Quote from: 1eleven on Sep 07, 11:28 AM 2015
Maybe I wasn't clear.   REMOVE MY ACCOUNT, not the last post.
Thats one for steve. I will pass your request on

RouletteGhost

If you come to a forum of a particular subject and inject yourself into a group of people who spend hours testing and sharing results, and you talk in circles expect to be met with this sort of thing.
It's insulting to those that take time

I believe p.a., giorgis, Petespin are all somehow connected. If I'm wrong so what.

The point is you come and make claims that the casino will close its doors be prepared to be judged. Because we have seen this a dozen times before and its annoying.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

6th-sense

here is a sheet as promised thanks to nick...works on the bot too..will only put ratio win rate up a few hundred spins i think...now you could use this as an example of a win ratio % when to bet within the 111 spin time frame...

atlantis

One or two members have asked me to show a result from one of my session tests.
So here goes...

A result testing the DOZENS method PA posted earlier in this thread:

Session last for 48 spins
I did not play every spin.
I won 11 bets
I lost 9 bets
I played 20 units in total
I won 33 units
I lost 20u
Profit = +13u
There were 20 bets made in total
Max drawdown = 2u
The highest bet was 1u
Start Bank = 100 ; End Bank=113
Lowest bankroll=98

It's what you can do if you solve RIDDLE and play 30/70 with mild progression.

A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

-