P.A :PREACHING about HG!

[Tamino]

Turner


Sir,


Thanks for setting the record straight. Glad for Flat N O  post included.

Nothing new under the sun . Deja vue.


Tamino

[thelaw]

Turner


Sir,


Thanks for setting the record straight. Glad for Flat N O  post included.

Nothing new under the sun . Deja vue.


Tamino

This is what I have been saying...................PA has just lifted material from other posts and "re-branded" it w/broken english.

He has presented nothing new, which is why Steve was able to dismantle his theories so quickly.

Just a wind-up..............nothing more.

.......but don't worry, even after PA finally exits, that will not be the end. He will come back under a different user name, and run this scam again.............because we let him!!!

[atlantis]

Congratulations to probasah on the

EUREKA

moment today!

A.

[Kattila]

Yes Turner is your tracker  ,  and again RIP for Ivica B.   

For others , i am not *chosen one*  and i don t have any * eureka* , i had some eureka 2  years ago , I don t consider to have
any ...hg... just  methods that for the moment keeps me on the *up* side.   Roulette is one  my passions and i like to play/discuss/test...  about it.
So that example from above is how i see EC bets, how maybe we can avoid long lossing streaks( which one can be very long). 
About how,what, when , why  ..... ask PA , but i think he said all in replys 301,303 ( and many others replys) what i see is missing is the **very good bet selection** something that each one must search and + the all other info from him Maybe can have some holy smoly like Hermes used to say( thanks Hermes
for all your info from the past, you was my mentor).
And how i undestand that LW ratio( 30/100..worst scenario) from PA.... i think he want to say to wait (long...) until we have some long lossing streaks, like lots of Ls and less Ws in the (any) last around/ between 50...70 spins ( ex:  LLLLWLLWLLLLLLLWWLLLLLLLWWWLLWLLLLLLL..etc...) then bet to catch few wins ,but if hit the few remained Ls, he use the variance avoidance ,progression, or in worst case stop( stop lose) at few Ls (like 4 or 5 in row) . Maybe I am wrong , don t know ....     anyway it seems that the  bet selection is the most important ingredient in his c***tail......

cheers   


.

[Turner]

This is what I have been saying...................PA has just lifted material from other posts and "re-branded" it w/broken english.

He has presented nothing new, which is why Steve was able to dismantle his theories so quickly.

Just a wind-up..............nothing more.

.......but don't worry, even after PA finally exits, that will not be the end. He will come back under a different user name, and run this scam again.............because we let him!!!

Law....ND isnt talking about your obsession with PA, and knowing Nate....giving him an opportunity to tip his hat to the old soldier Faltino

Best to read a post carefully before commenting.

[RouletteGhost]

Flatino claimed the gr8 progression on double dozens worked. Maybe I'll give it a WHIRL

[Kattila]

Also Leveller from Hermes is v. good one for two dozens combined with good bet selection.

[thelaw]

Law....ND isnt talking about your obsession with PA, and knowing Nate....giving him an opportunity to tip his hat to the old soldier Faltino

Best to read a post carefully before commenting.

"Nothing new under the sun. Deja vu."

This is what I was responding to........

Best to read a post carefully before commenting.

[Turner]

Yes Turner is your tracker  ,  and again RIP for Ivica B.   

For others , i am not *chosen one*  and i don t have any * eureka* , i had some eureka 2  years ago , I don t consider to have
any ...hg... just  methods that for the moment keeps me on the *up* side.   Roulette is one  my passions and i like to play/discuss/test...  about it.
So that example from above is how i see EC bets, how maybe we can avoid long lossing streaks( which one can be very long). 
About how,what, when , why  ..... ask PA , but i think he said all in replys 301,303 ( and many others replys) what i see is missing is the **very good bet selection** something that each one must search and + the all other info from him Maybe can have some holy smoly like Hermes used to say( thanks Hermes
for all your info from the past, you was my mentor).
And how i undestand that LW ratio( 30/100..worst scenario) from PA.... i think he want to say to wait (long...) until we have some long lossing streaks, like lots of Ls and less Ws in the (any) last around/ between 50...70 spins ( ex:  LLLLWLLWLLLLLLLWWLLLLLLLWWWLLWLLLLLLL..etc...) then bet to catch few wins ,but if hit the few remained Ls, he use the variance avoidance ,progression, or in worst case stop( stop lose) at few Ls (like 4 or 5 in row) . Maybe I am wrong , don t know ....     anyway  the  bet selection is the most important ingredient in his c***tail......

cheers   


.

I listened to Number six a lot.
He always deemed virtual betting taboo and insisted that you can only produce a WL reg. from placed bets.

Which kills hit and run.

I dont like virtual betting, hit and run or fabricating WL registries for prediction.

[Turner]

"Nothing new under the sun. Deja vu."

This is what I was responding to........

Best to read a post carefully before commenting.

Thanks for the explaination

[thelaw]

Thanks for the explaination

No prob. All respect to members who are no longer with us.

[atlantis]

Hi Turner,

>>>I dont like virtual betting, hit and run or fabricating WL registries for prediction<<<

No virtual betting for me either if possible. Certainly in my PA test today normal bets only.

A.

[Steve]

Anyone wanting to test systems see link:://:.roulettephysics.com/testing/

Most important is below:

Identify the working principle of your roulette strategy

For a roulette system to work, there must be a reason why it works. This sounds simple enough, but most people blindly test hoping that there is some unknown principle or secret they have uncovered, which allows them to win. When developing a system, it should begin with an idea. I’ll use the concept of thinking that eventually there will be some kind of balance that occurs. For example, say 10 reds spin in a row. This is a classic example, and you may believe that red is on a streak. Or you may believe that black is finally due to spin next. The reality is the odds don’t change, because previous spins do not affect future spins, at least in the way that most gamblers expect. But for the sake of keeping things simple, let’s assume that you think black is finally due to spin. Before you waste thousands of dollars testing this principle, check the results of real roulette spins, and look for cases where there are many red numbers in a row. Then check how many times either black or red wheel spin next. Forgetting that zero exists, normally you can expect there to be a 50-50 chance of either colour spinning. Now does your test indicate the odds change after a streak of colours?

[Turner]

No prob. All respect to members who are no longer with us.

Amen to that !!

[Kattila]

I know Turner that many don t like / use virtual betting , but in some situations they can help and in others situation they can t...........
I use them like some Maps....***how would be the LW registry if i have been used/bet that bet selection..o that one...or the other one......***

cheers