GAPS in sixline

[donik7777]

Hello!
I using gaps 4 and more in sixline. Don't needed progression because you win much more than lost.     
Very seldom lost.
Need more testing.

[attachimg=2]

[VLS]

Hello Donik, thanks for sharing.


Image formatted

[donik7777]

Thanks VLS!

[donik7777]

I tested about 700 spins
Win 92 units
lost 5 times=25 units

ONLY FLAT BET.
Need more testing using only 4 gaps and more.
6 gaps and more never lost still.  

NEED MORE TEST.
Cheers.

[roulettefan]

@Donnik

Hi can you explain how you play please

[donik7777]

I bet against creating same interval in any sixline you can see in table above. Like JL method FIVE.
Thanks Johnlegend.

[GLC]

Donki777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777,


Any rhyme or reason for 7777?


I want to hit the "like" button for this system also.  Looks great.


We must be careful though, when playing  with an 84% win expectation, the losses can hide in waiting for quite a while before jumping in the game with a bang.  And, at 5 units per loss, an unexpected rash of losses close together can do some real damage to our profits.


Having said my peace, I still like the initial strike rate.  It shows that it can do well just like Nickmsi's latest contribution.  Wins can be many before a down turn.  That means we should be able to make a very playable system with a few boundaries to keep us away from the Warlocks.





GLC

[ginger]

Hello!
I using gaps 4 and more in sixline. Don't needed progression because you win much more than lost.     
Very seldom lost.
Need more testing.

[attachimg=2]

Hello Donik,

It looks promising but there is only one problem........I don't understand your drawing.

Would you be so kind to explain what you mean with all the X's and bets.

Thank you.

Cheers


John     Rotterdam

[donik7777]

Hello Ginger!
6 vertical columns is 6 sixlines.
X in which sixline we got number.

[ginger]

Hello Ginger!
6 vertical columns is 6 sixlines.
X in which sixline we got number.

Hello Donik,

Thank you for your explanation.

I will give it a try over the weekend.

Cheers

John

[donik7777]

I played 10 and more gaps.
453 win
42x5=210 lost

[GLC]

Don,  If this works playing 4 gaps, why wouldn't it work playing 3-4-5 or 6 gaps simultaneously.  In other words if the last gap was 3 why not bet against a 3 gap following.  Or if another line has a 5 gap, bet that it won't have another 5 gap next. 

This gives us a lot more bets.  If we have a 5 gap and our line hits after only 3, the 5 gap is history and now we bet against another 3 etc...

I've looked at some of win-maxx's historic spins and so far so good.  The good thing about win-maxx historic spins is that they organize them the way you did for your 6 line chart.  Makes it easy to see how the system is working.

Beware, they don't place the zeros in the spreadsheets.  They are in the spin results so you have to keep alert so as not to miss a zero.  It'll skew the results if you do.

[ego]

GLC and donik7777 just one small question.

If i see a gap where one line did not hit between five attempts - then next time i would bet that it will show more early with next gap - is that correct.

Is that what the bet selection is based upon.
You pick a gap with a certain distance - when it appers you play next it will show earlyer and not create the same distance gap again.

[donik7777]

Hello EGO!
I played against that this be more than before,
f.e. 6 be 7 or more doesn't matter how long.

GLC our goal only 4-5 units. If this strong method  you can bet f.e. 100$ or more only if this strong.
And i see we need play with gaps 10 and more - much better results, if you have winnmax table  (i test on winnmax there easier check) you can check less lost. 
It all depends on the frequency of events when certain events occur rarely it is very difficult to do these random events in a row and still affects a large coverage of 83%.
Please GLC test this if you have time and give results. Thanks.

[Kattila]

read this by Winkel (about distances between lines )
link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=6703.msg62459#msg62459


cheers