• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

NLE mk2

Started by bleep24, Nov 13, 12:53 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

bleep24

NLE is still ok but because of the Brexit and US presidential election I decided that those events were the catalyst for NLE mk2 (only joking)

This could/will/possibly/maybe of interest particularly to Mogul who liked NLE but could not fathom out staking/progression.

For those that never  saw it or have forgot what NLE is all about:  it is waiting for 2 of the same EC becoming 3. (   I love rocket science)

Well mk2 is waiting for 3 of the same EC to become 4 (Heavens above!)  There are less 3`s to become 4`s so it is easier to track and work out stakes because there are not as many multiple opportunities to cause confusion.

Some may wish to play each EC separately but I play them all together to avoid multiple 3`s of the same EC occuring  possibly causing a long losing run.

Best of luck,
Brian                               


nottophammer

Fine tuned it now bleep?
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

bleep24

Hi,

I play same staking as mk1:      +1/-1          Bet any of the 6 E/C`s jointly:   ie:  not separately. 

Good luck,
Brian

mogul397

You know, there doesn't seem to be much happening here. But of late at least I seem to
have achieved some notoriety as having my own thread
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18232.msg168423;topicseen#msg168423
"just for mogul".
or honorable (??) mention in other threads.

I'm kind of a topic by myself. (Or at least my opinions are memorable).  Kind of like
the advice colum in the paper.

I think it's an hysterical post you made. Interesting that you're thinking outside your own box.

Here's a request. Which has been consistently made before.

Would you be willing to catalogue a session, record it in DETAIL and post it here?
Yes it is some work. But I am asking if you would do it. Showing the spin results and the
math involved in your bets?

And I already know that this could turn into a "bad example", where by accident the example
is exceedingly easy or something and doesn't reflect the work that might be needed.

It would clarify the whole mess and get us on the same page.

Thanks

"the mogul".
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

WE would start with

1) bet unit size.
2) Buy in.
3) Show session.
4) end with max drawdown. Max bet.  And profit/loss.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

nottophammer

these just played on multi player watching trot +44
21
13
31
10
3
21
8
22
14
35
8
16
15
12
16
10
16
13
17
30
10
22
16
5
14
0
4
9
3
35
8
18
17
23
9
2
19
34
9
31
28
2
24
0
13
8
31
12
7
14
32
10
35
35
30
35
31
17
27
31
pretty fast on there, think theres 28 of the 37 hit
Perhaps the latest celebrity on here could show the workings, 397
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

little mistake not +1/-1 and spin 44, but would be plus. Good bleep :thumbsup:
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

nottophammer

quick 40 spins on MPR +274 watching the trot,only 21 in 40 spins, big bets on last few as countback showed slow.
Heres the numbers
23
4
7
30
11
3
33
13
7
29
27
31
3
21
22
33
30
23
19
3
12
19
27
6
23
31
35
33
3
19
3
10
33
33
13
17
23
17
1
32
maybe run them tomorrow or the celebrity could
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

mogul397

Quote from: nottophammer on Nov 17, 04:11 PM 2016
these just played on multi player watching trot +44
21
13
31
10
3
21
8
22
14
35
8
16
15
12
16
10
16
13
17
30
10
22
16
5
14
0
4
9
3
35
8
18
17
23
9
2
19
34
9
31
28
2
24
0
13
8
31
12
7
14
32
10
35
35
30
35
31
17
27
31
pretty fast on there, think theres 28 of the 37 hit
Perhaps the latest celebrity on here could show the workings, 397

What is multi player?
What is trot?
And then what did you do?


No body knows what you're talking about.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

nottophammer

What Ray is asking about in GUT, 0x's.
Are you going to show Bleep you know how to play NLE and show the workings
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

mogul397

Quote from: nottophammer on Nov 18, 03:24 PM 2016
What Ray is asking about in GUT, 0x's.
Are you going to show Bleep you know how to play NLE and show the workings

No, I won't show that. Cause I don't know how. How can or would I show something
that I don't know?

That is why I keep asking him. I'd like to see the math of how a session would work out.
And in particular where he cuts off (or doesn't cut off) when he's left in the middle somewhere
of the D'alenbert. Like he's betting 5 or 6 units, fought to get enough units back to get even,
and decides to stop the session even, left cast adrift in a bedpan.

And then taking it to my next level, wondering if he might care enough to actually do the work
at least once, or if he's just too F#$% lazy.

I do think he's from England, or something.  Writes like he is. Remember. The English invented the
"tooth brush".  So they could brush the single tooth they have left.  So maybe that complacency
effects all parts of life.

Sorry. You brought up that awkward example.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

I think what I was more wondering about was the part where, betting 2 dozen,
A progression of +/- 1 was used for the doubles.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

mogul397

My inclination is still that the results of any of these methods tend to cluster.
My testing shows it.

So if I am looking at dozens.  2 or 3. Then two tends to become 3 in a group.
And betting 2-1, for one dozen is a lot easier on the bank and the nerves than
the double.
NOBODY knows what you THINK they know

nottophammer

Quote from: mogul397 on Nov 21, 09:43 AM 2016
I think what I was more wondering about was the part where, betting 2 dozen,
A progression of +/- 1 was used for the doubles.
In dont knockit till you try it, reply 31 theres a nice set of spins showing the doz and the double dozen to bet, all with parley. Is that what you are talking of
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

-