NLE mk2

bigmoney · Mar 08, 04:02 PM 2017

Thank you bleep

Tekunda · Mar 08, 04:32 PM 2017

Quote from: bleep24 on Mar 08, 03:17 PM 2017
Hi Tekunda,
Not sure what exactly you are playing? Is it strictly NLE? Units bet should always be the same. eg: 2 on B then 2 on L/ 4 on R then 4 on H if they are the qualifiers at the same time for example. If you need to bet 5 units and 2 qualifiers come up then bet either 2 or 3 on each.
You will note that I said play all 3 EC`s to give variance. You do not appear to be doing that. That is why I mainly like 3 becoming 4 as tracking 2 to become 3 is hard and can become confusing.

Cheers,
Brian

Brian, I am playing two ECs instead of three. That is until I have enough practice to play all three ECs.
My problem is that often the ECs don't qualify at the same time.
During my first session one EC was qualifying 7 times in a row, (and lost every time so the unit count went up) 3 while the other EC didn't qualify at all. So I ended up at minus 16 with the one EC and the next bet would have been an 8 unit bet. Now the second EC suddenly qualified for the very first time. So I have a bet of 8 units for one chance and one of 1 unit for the second chance (had I treated the ECs separately). But since we do not go this route (keeping a separate account for each EC), I need to divide the 8 unit bet and the 1 unit bet between the two ECs. Would you recommend to just divide the two bets between the two ECs like 4 units and 4 units?
If there is not such a huge difference in qualifying e. g. 3 units one EC and 4 units the second EC it is rather simple. But in my case we have a 1 unit qualifier and a second 8 unit qualifier. So I could go 3 units for the chance which qualified for the first time and 5 units for the chance which kept qualifying but also kept loosing?

So in other words if the 2 ECs keep qualifying more or less simultaneously it is not too difficult to divide the necessary units. But what would you recommend when like in my case one chance lags behind 8 times. Then I end up with two bets with a huge difference in units, which I need somehow to resolve between the 2 ECs I was betting on.

bigmoney · Mar 08, 05:07 PM 2017

Hey bleep
What money management / staking system did u employ for the nle mk 1
Big money

mogul397 · Mar 08, 08:51 PM 2017

Quote from: bleep24 on Mar 08, 03:42 PM 2017
Hi Mogul,

Good idea that. It means that we should catch the table trend. (I know that you like/believe in trends) I will try and remember to put it into practice.

Brian

And you agreed with the premise.

bleep24 · Mar 08, 11:56 PM 2017

Hi Big Money,

+1/-1 Roughly, because when 2 or 3 opps. come up at same time you cannot follow this strictly so I use a loose rolling progression as you only have one bank. I calculate where I am and work out number of units to stake and how many opps. at same time there are, and depending on result of that spin work it out again for next spin.

You do not have to be precise. For example: if I need to bet 5 units and 2 opps. come up then I will bet 3 units on each. You can of course just bet one of those opps. and adjust your units accoprdingly.

As you can see, it can become a bit hectic which is why I have now switched in the main to betting 3 same to become 4.

Good luck,
Brian

bigmoney · Mar 09, 01:02 AM 2017

Hi brian
Thank tou for that ...how many units do u recommend to have in a bank ?

bleep24 · Mar 09, 03:42 AM 2017

Hi Big Money,

100 units will be sufficient.

Brian

bigmoney · Mar 09, 04:05 AM 2017

Hi bleep will backtest this and do the money management .....woth it cheers matey

Priyanka · Mar 09, 04:35 AM 2017

Quote from: bleep24 on Mar 08, 11:56 PM 2017
+1/-1 Roughly, because when 2 or 3 opps. come up at same time you cannot follow this strictly so I use a loose rolling progression as you only have one bank. I calculate where I am and work out number of units to stake and how many opps. at same time there are, and depending on result of that spin work it out again for next spin.

Nice one bleep... It worked like a cake last night at the casino.

Mogul - Is there any trick that we could adopt for the three scenarios that you are talking about. Hoping to see the marquee and then decide what to play in that session, has it helped. Will try adopting the same.

bigmoney · Mar 09, 04:45 AM 2017

Some sessions will lose based on my backtesting ...im still tjinking falklor gonna deliver on his reaearch

bigmoney · Mar 09, 04:47 AM 2017

Some sessions will lose based on my backtesting ...im still tjinking falklor gonna deliver on his reaearch

bigmoney · Mar 09, 04:57 AM 2017

Priyanka posts .... the person that has been coached ...in cycles of e/c s ... but gives hints and wont reveal all ? ....BIG MONEY ..
..SMILING

bleep24 · Mar 09, 05:44 AM 2017

Hi Big Money,

Surprised that you came across losing sessions. Were you using all 3 EC`s? Only times that I have ever lost is when I was in middle of a progression and had to stop playing.

Yes you can see a single EC stay at 2 same for quite a few spins and that is why we are playing all 3 EC`s to get around this. If one EC is sticking at 2 same then the other 2 EC`s will be going to 3`s to counteract.

Cheers,
Brian

BTW. In a previous post I mentioned mainly now playing 3 same to become 4. Easier to track but less qualifiers.

nottophammer · Mar 09, 06:21 AM 2017

Quote from: Priyanka on Mar 09, 04:35 AM 2017. It worked like a cake last night at the casino.

Which casino group was that Pri, if it's Aspers group you was lucky

Tekunda · Mar 09, 06:58 AM 2017

Hi Brian, although you haven't addressed my last post, from your answer to big money I was able to deduct your staking plan.
It is not a precise way of staking like you would if playing all ECs simultaneously and separatly. You look at the whole picture, how many units you have won or lost and decide accordingly. I think I got it now.

News:

NLE mk2