Bankroll size and daily targets

[Johnlegend]

Hola John

So yr recipe 4 success is 2 take any method, play it hit n run n in case of loss double or triple  yr stakes in d next game n u r guaranteed a steady profit?  Its ingenious....    I wonder why nobody else came up with this idea b4?  And u had only 3 double loses in 3900 games?
Its like getting only 3 loses betting against any pattern of 6 ECs...

Regards

That's one aspect of it Huut. No it simply wouldnt work like that with a continual pattern of 6. Remember I know as well as anyone should KNOW. Random can evenutally figure out any playable method. Where random struggles to defeat a method is when you take CONTINUITY out of the equation. Break up its flow. That's what playing High Low and Odd Even at the same time does. Often one is carrying the other.

Example. I have had times where High and low gives me this.

WWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWWLWWWWLWWWWWWW

Over the same span of games Odd Even gives me this.

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWW

Do you understand what I've shown you?. One even chance has performed brilliantly while the other underperformed. But STILL the overall strikerate ends up being above 7/1

Then theres the 7th pattern which I have been studying very closely. Its a gift to see how it closes often inside a certain number of cycles. Remember before 8 comes 7. This is another powerpoint of the PATTERN BREAKER concept. And is another reason this method is going to be at the top of my pile forever.

You let random work FOR YOU not against you. That is why Viles 3 AGAINST THE LINE is so good. And already the forum has let it go. Its a shame STAYING POWER is seriously lacking among roulette players in general. And because it is, most are going nowhere with this game ever.

[Robeenhuut]

That's one aspect of it Huut. No it simply wouldnt work like that with a continual pattern of 6. Remember I know as well as anyone should KNOW. Random can evenutally figure out any playable method. Where random struggles to defeat a method is when you take CONTINUITY out of the equation. Break up its flow. That's what playing High Low and Odd Even at the same time does. Often one is carrying the other.

Example. I have had times where High and low gives me this."

WWWLWWWWLWWWWWWWWLWWWWLWWWWWWW

Over the same span of games Odd Even gives me this.

WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWLWWWWWW

Do you understand what I've shown you?. One even chance has performed brilliantly while the other underperformed. But STILL the overall strikerate ends up being above 7/1

Then theres the 7th pattern which I have been studying very closely. Its a gift to see how it closes often inside a certain number of cycles. Remember before 8 comes 7. This is another powerpoint of the PATTERN BREAKER concept. And is another reason this method is going to be at the top of my pile forever.

You let random work FOR YOU not against you. That is why Viles 3 AGAINST THE LINE is so good. And already the forum has let it go. Its a shame STAYING POWER is seriously lacking among roulette players in general. And because it is, most are going nowhere with this game ever.

I admire John yr way with words and phrases. Like "breaking up random flow", "taking continuity out of the equation", "random working 4 u" n so on. They became instant classics n basically there is no way 2 argue with them because nobody really understands what they really mean except u. 
There is no breaking up random - another fallacy. Once u make that claim u claim 2 have Holy Grail in yr hands.
I have another useful expression 4 u - boxed in.  U seem 2 have random boxed in some only 4 u known patterns.  And i dont have any clue what u really meant by comparing behavior of O/E n H/L. That any EC can go on a long winning streak?  About continuity factor. It seems that Trilogy is based on continuity factor. U claim that DZ n CL continue 2 behave in d same way in 20 spins sample. Anyway as i said i can not really argue with you because i dont really understand what u mean.  But if u can not convince them just confuse them  It seems 2 be yr tactic.  And as 2 Vile method u can see that we not only criticize your methods.
By d way where is this post?

[Johnlegend]

I admire John yr way with words and phrases. Like "breaking up random flow", "taking continuity out of the equation", "random working 4 u" n so on. They became instant classics n basically there is no way 2 argue with them because nobody really understands what they really mean except u. 
There is no breaking up random - another fallacy. Once u make that claim u claim 2 have Holy Grail in yr hands.
I have another useful expression 4 u - boxed in.  U seem 2 have random boxed in some only 4 u known patterns.  And i don't have any clue what u really meant by comparing behavior of O/E n H/L. That any EC can go on a long winning streak?  About continuity factor. It seems that Trilogy is based on continuity factor. U claim that DZ n CL continue 2 behave in d same way in 20 spins sample. Anyway as i said i can not really argue with you because i don't really understand what u mean.  But if You can not convince them just confuse them  It seems 2 be yr tactic.  And as 2 Vile method You can see that we not only criticize your methods.
By d way where is this post?

Its Simple Huut. Often when one is underperforming the other is shining. Playing them off eachother is magical. And gives PATTERN BREAKER its strength. And that 7th pattern has become a great element of the concept adding additional profit to a game.

Huut you just dont know it but on the forum are several roulette killers. There just isnt enough people able to stay with them long enough. If you had 10,000 players in North America for example who could stay with a method like Chauncy47 and myself can. There would be some worried casino owners. But no, the majority chop and change on almost a daily basis. And nothing solid ever gets achieved. Where is the fallacy in breaking up random?? Thats exactly why ive profitted so well from hit and run for years. You are breaking up random. You are escaping the minefield of loss more often than if you just sit there waiting to lose.

Until that sinks into alot more brains no progress is going to ever take place in this game. All the losing attitudes will remain.