• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Members most popular strategies

Started by mario12346, Apr 20, 03:44 AM 2014

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

GARNabby

I'm sure that someone who pays so much attention to detail hasn't told us everything.

Steve

Can anyone please point out the logic of WHY this system is supposed to work?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

ati

Betting on 35 numbers will not work. You will lose 2 out of 37 spins average. You might hit 100 times in a row, but you can also lose 2 times in a row. Just try it with the random.org rng, think of 2 numbers you wouldn't bet on, and hit generate a couple times.
I tried this some time ago at BV NZ real money with the smallest unit, and it did lose many times, and that has half the chance of losing compared to a European wheel.
I attached a graph of 1000 spins, so you can clearly see it's a loser even short term.

Steve

Yes betting 35 numbers doesnt changes your chances at all. It's just 35 x independent single number bets.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Proofreaders2000

I tried betting 35 numbers until I lost $70 years ago.  That stopped it.

-