The "Statistical Imbalance" fallacy

[Badger]

Dyksexlic, Vaddi, Priyanka, Reddwarf.

They all claimed to beat roulette using one or another form of maths.
Unless they personally admit that they were wrong, there will always be an element on this forum that believe that roulette can be beaten.

[Blueprint]

Read my thread.
link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=27425.0

No, thanks.  But would love to know why you keep pointing people to your threads.

[cht]

But would love to know why you keep pointing people to your threads.

People still continue to make mistakes with the math. Steve is right to call them uneducated. 👌

[Blueprint]

People still continue to make mistakes with the math. Steve is right to call them uneducated. 👌

Education is great and I'm all for it but what's the promise of your thread?  If it's just educational, fine, but to most will still be a waste of time and energy and will not improve their results.

[cht]

Education is great and I'm all for it but what's the promise of your thread?  If it's just educational, fine, but to most will still be a waste of time and energy and will not improve their results.

My thread states unambiguously and clearly the math of roulette.

At the minimum people have to get the math correct. Without that it's all nonsensical superstitious opinion.

The starting point to improvement is to get the basic math correct. Yet even with my education math base thread people continue to make simple mistakes on forum.

Is there any chance for improvement if people ignore the math ? 🤔
No hope at all.

I improved leaps and bounds when I made the decision to educate myself. I recognise mistakes and ignorance immediately.
What about you?

[Blueprint]

I’m a simple caveman but I do enjoy learning new things.

[Ross]

I made my last post today - 190920

Another broken promise.  Can't believe anything these days.

[CarpeDiem]

Another broken promise.  Can't believe anything these days.

Ross, what's your contribution to this thread/forum?
I for one enjoy cht's posts and surely am not the only one. Look at it this way: even if it's all smoke and mirrors(which i seriously doubt), at least you read a couple of physics articles and have improved your knowledge.
Cht, don't mind the naysayers, they come and go, like waves breaking on the shore. Continue sharing your ideas

[Ross]

Ross, what's your contribution to this thread/forum?

Search members for Ross and click on posts to see.

[cht]

Another broken promise.  Can't believe anything these days.

I will continue to post math and science based posts on forum when I have the time. Only GAMBLERS are irked by factual posts. People like you will not stop factual posts aimed at improving the education. This is the ONLY path for systems bettors.

[Moxy]

Yes my advanced students have the hg. It's called Fingerprint, an approach designed to decipher any stream of numbers.

For me, it's not about the money. It's about vetting the individual to join a tight group of individual wolves. 36,000.00 opens the door to a lifestyle.

coughbullshitcough

[cht]

Kimo, so the hg is $36k, is that right?

Are any of your students in forums who are earning $500k/year, pr similarly large amounts, who can support your claims?

There are people who paid $2k for lesson#1.

These guys don't even understand the material they received. This is real story that happened - paid for cryptic material.

More lesson material to explain earlier lessons require more payment. That's the lure.

These people who paid the $2k wasted their money. Money they can ill afford.

Steve, this is a definite scam.
Steal money from desperate people.

Tell us Kimo, how much have you stolen?

[Moxy]

Exactly. Of course I would expect to pay a large sum for the HG, but before doing so I would expect some pretty good evidence that the system works as claimed. Kimo is offering none and asks us to buy on 'a leap of faith'. Handing over 26k based on his word alone is a pretty big leap. It's not as though he couldn't provide the proof if he wanted to; the fact that he chooses not to speaks volumes.

Large is relative.  Me personally 5-10 mil or so.  For people on here 1k.  It's the forever tango of the hustler and the wishful thinkers.  Give them an offer they can't refuse.

I'm actually surprised that some notables on here took the bait.

[cht]

Large is relative.  Me personally 5-10 mil or so.  For people on here 1k.  It's the forever tango of the hustler and the wishful thinkers.  Give them an offer they can't refuse.

I'm actually surprised that some notables on here took the bait.

This is theoretically wrong.
Most people who don't understand statistics get this wrong.

Joe, pls explain the statistics math.
I understand but I can't explain it properly.
Other than post the relevant videos on this topic.

[Moxy]

Not only doesnt he provide proof. There are some serious red flags and contradictions.

Also I haven't seen even one thing that supports his claims.

Methinks you should entertain the  probable notion that he's most likely a hustler?   Shouldn't let a (relatively) cheap offer cloud your judgment.