@ turbo

[Scarface]

So, using RTM, we should play a cold number after it hits?

[Madi]

Extreme events are the same.  Meaning that if you've just witnessed an extreme event, then your expectation moving forward is that the event never happened in the past.  In other words, just ignore the past spins.  (Unless you're attempting to exploit the gaming device.)

Ok got it. What is matter is can we predict the next spin or not. What is ur suggestion for system player or anything can be done with to be hot number or any other number? Bcz visual ballistic , computer or bias wheel is not for everyone u understand that. Some need high experienced or big money. Can we do something using any kind of system that u r aware of?

[Steve]

Start with basic vb. Really its easy.

[Steve]

Shit hot tipperary, Turner if you was here better than that shite IPA

Poison. Roll me a joint.

[Turner]

Turner,

Your posts on this thread are distracting and off topic.
Please start another thread.

Thanks.

Yo, sure ding.  I get right on dat fo U.



Jus let me get da ride movin furst! cheers lad

And this is on topic?

Forget the passive aggressive shit and stop trying to goad me.

This was never about you, and as ever, you are trying to make it so.

LET IT GO  (I know you find it hard)

[Steve]

If turbo was focused on helping others, he would at least acknowledge parx and rs are not realistic simulators. Broad unrealistic betting limits and huge bonuses. Youd have to be an idiot to honestly think its realistic. I explained it clearly.

But i dont think he's focused on helping others. He's doing this for ego. Its baiting which is against forum rules. Thats why he fights hard claiming parx and rs are realistic, and mpr where he lost is apparently not realistic.

I mean come on. Thats just one point. You'd have to be a fool to believe him on this one point alone. But there are many others.

Turbos manipulation has temporarily degraded the forum. Its only possible with ignorant members.  Again it happens with a new guru every now and then like i said.  Its just up to members to be logical and see through the crap.

[wiggy]

If turbo was focused on helping others, he would at least acknowledge parx and rs are not realistic simulators. Broad unrealistic betting limits and huge bonuses. Youd have to be an idiot to honestly think its realistic. I explained it clearly.

Here is my favourite Casino in London and some of their limits. On a single number, I can have £500. There are many like these in the area and they are not even that exclusive. You are full of shit Steve and to be honest, you always were and always will be.

[fossell]

If I don't play carefully be it Parx or real play. I lose. They could flip the edge at Parx to be 10% over, I'd still lose. Bonuses or not. The forums hardly being degraded mate. Seems some fools on here are getting off on this. They could be spending their time starting some other threads sharing ideas instead but…

[Steve]

Here is my favourite Casino in London and some of their limits. On a single number, I can have £500. There are many like these in the area and they are not even that exclusive. You are full of shit Steve and to be honest, you always were and always will be.

Wiggy, in my local casino they have limits between $0.50 min, and $100,000 maximum although the table limits can vary depending on who's playing. But not on the same table. The typical difference between the min-max bets on the same table for inside bets is around 10 times.

For example, a $10 minimum means a $100 maximum bet. It does vary between casinos, but not to the extent of RS. I have never known of such a broad limit. The exception is a German casino with euro 500 - 50,000 for outside bets, but a still the typical limit for inside bets.

You forgot to show the bottom part, for some reason:



Looks like the roulette limit spread for inside bets is 20x - still far from RS.

So show me a real casino that has the table limits as broad as RS for inside bets, for a single table, then I'll admit I'm wrong  Otherwise, who's full of shit?

[TurboGenius]

For the record (not that it matters)

Golden Nugget live money play (online for real money) I get
$1.00 min to $100.00 max on any straight up bet.
that's 1-100 spread for units.

Parx Euro wheel online game is $10.00 min to $100.00 max
that's an absurd 1-10 spread for units. *but that's ok right ?

Celtic live wheel online is $1.00 min to $10.00 max
that's ALSO an absurd 1-10 spread for units. *again, that's ok right ?

Roulette Simulator game is $1.00 min to $250.00 max
that's a 1-250 spread in units.

So Parx Euro and Celtic are 1-10, Live play at GN is 1-100 !!!
and RSim being the most "generous" at 1-250.
The two "fun play games" are terrible compared to real life.
But supposedly everyone wins on the simulation because of the amazing spread
of 1-10 compared to 1-100 at a real money casino site.
The Parx online game "Deluxe" $100.00 - $205,714.28
or 1 - 2,057.14 unit size. Is this "realistic" ? no.

All of these games, each and every one gives the player a 1:37 chance
of winning with a payout of 35:1
Each of these gives random spins. Each of these the house edge is the same.
Each of these players win and lose at exactly the same math as in the casino.

GN online for real play is 1-100 and better than all but the "Deluxe" wheel at Parx and RSim.

[Steve]

Golden Nugget live money play (online for real money) I get
$1.00 min to $100.00 max on any straight up bet.
that's 1-100 spread for units.

Not that rare for such small units.

Parx Euro wheel online game is $10.00 min to $100.00 max that's an absurd 1-10 spread for units. *but that's ok right ?

Tighter than usual, and yes its ok. But you arent winning millions with real money Parx, are you? You prefer spending time winning play money.

Roulette Simulator game is $1.00 min to $250.00 max that's a 1-250 spread in units.

They changed it? Is that why I cant see you on the leaderboard now? Still there are lots of big winners there.



Did you deliberately lose your money at RS too, like you did at Parx? What happened?

Celtic live wheel online is $1.00 min to $10.00 max that's ALSO an absurd 1-10 spread for units. *again, that's ok right ?

Sure it's ok. But why are you listing casinos where you aren't winning millions like with Parx fun mode? Are you saying you have the same success with real money?

[TurboGenius]

Did you deliberately lose your money at RS too, like you did at Parx? What happened?

My balance isn't listed because my account is set to "private".
Private accounts aren't listed on the leader board. I can always take it off of private
and snap a screenshot. I'm in 2nd. I still have not a single reset and not a single losing session.. which can of course be verified since I'm surely lying right ?

Again. I told everyone ahead of time (even you) that I was going to lose (on purpose) my balance at Parx. I said this before I did it - then I did it the next day.
You continue to accuse me of losing it in some other way.
I proved a point - you can have a huge amount and lose it, there's no rigging where
just because you have a huge bankroll you can't lose.
People lose if they don't use a winning method.
But none of these facts matter, I've said them before and now you say it's an excuse even though I clearly said it ahead of time that I was going to lose it to prove a point. Useless.

Bago has 3rd one week and 10th+ last week. Nothing whatsoever compared to what I did over MONTHS but you won't give me credit for that either.
Turns out - I'm not the one being misleading at all. Go figure.

[Kairomancer]

My local live dealer online casino has 1 to 200 units on inside bets.
It has an an RNG table as well with 1 to 800 units spread.
Too bad the maximum bet is about $70 in currency equivalent.

[TurboGenius]

They changed it? Is that why I cant see you on the leaderboard now? Still there are lots of big winners there.

All of the players are listed - and the overall balance is exactly the HOUSE EDGE.
Much like the other game I hear about that is the only way to prove something works or not.
Despite the 1-250 spread - the overall balance among all players is the house edge negative
for the players....because the min and max don't matter one bit.
You can bet more, therefore you lose MORE. You can bet more, therefore you can win MORE (the "more" doesn't change the math of the game)

Ignore this fact... continue on.

[Steve]

I've said numerous times:

1. Your large winnings on RS are probably due to the broad and unrealistic betting limits.

2. Other players win big too as a result of the betting limits. Do they all have the secret HG?

In your recent response (above), you cited the CURRENT inside betting limit at RS, which is 1-250. As I recall, it was more like 1 to 2000. I assume they changed it. Can anyone confirm?

But regardless, looking at the current limits for inside bets, I've never seen different limits for different types of inside bets. The inside betting limits go up to 1500:

because the min and max don't matter one bit.
You can bet more, therefore you lose MORE

You contradicted yourself again. The slots players at Parx blitz everyone. You said that was because they have a higher maximum bet. Now you're saying bet size doesn't matter?

The truth is of course it matters. A player with smaller bets will never compete with a player who can afford larger bets. That's why the leaderboard on parx is nonsense, and the win rate on MPR is are far better indicator of a player's results. But remember, you dont play at MPR since you lost because it's not as realistic as Parx. 

As I said before, the key to ranking high on parx is getting the large daily login bonuses, then out-betting others. But dont play too much - play just enough to out-rank the others, then get the extra bonuses money, then repeat the process. But you expect us to believe you never ever used the bonuses money.