Beating roulette with math..

[Fripper]

Only -482  You got lucky choosing the EC's ??

I don't know. I always choose the most choppy one but if it hasn't hit in the last 3 or 4 spins I wait or choose another EC.

[Fripper]

Session 9 of Bayes horror sessions.

Did bet high.

118 low, 78 high.

+1 in 28 spins, ended first labby
+6 in 74 spins, ended second labby
+9 in 96 spins, ended third labby
+13 in 142 spins, ended forth labby
+17 in 205 spins, ended fifth labby

Highest bet 26 units.
Lowest point -29 units.

Easy session

RX file and excel file attached 

[aleks06]

Hej Fripper 


Well done with session 9.

Session 11 is a tough one.

When do you divide the bets into 3 or even 4 figures ?

I think I will start playing for real in the next days with a 1500 units BR (150€ / 0,10€ chips )

BR target 1500€

I will post my results.

[Fripper]

Session 10 of Bayes horror sessions.

Did bet high.

117 low, 73 high.

+1 in 26 spins, ended first labby
+2 in 71 spins, ended second labby
+3 in 103 spins, ended third labby
+6 in 165 spins, ended forth labby
+10 in 197 spins

Highest bet 88 units
Lowest point -126 units

Both RX and excel file attached. 

[Fripper]

Hej Fripper 


Well done with session 9.

Session 11 is a tough one.

When do you divide the bets into 3 or even 4 figures ?

I think I will start playing for real in the next days with a 1500 units BR (150€ / 0,10€ chips )

BR target 1500€

I will post my results.

Thanks, Ok I will do session 11 maybe tomorrow. Will see what I get.

If the bets I have divided gets more than 18 units, I divide into 3 figures instead.
Example:
Lose 14 and 28. 42 units /2 = 21 units
In that case I divide 42/3 and get 14,14,14 instead.

Nice to hear and I wish you good luck!
I'm starting very low as I don't have a large bankroll to start with.

I have taken 35$ upto 65$ only using 0.05$ bets.

Where shall you play?

[N0vocane]

Can we get someone to code this in RX? I would love to run this through daily Wiesbaden spins.

[aleks06]

Ok thanks more than 18 units. Maybe betvoyager

Why do you want to run this through daily wiesbaden spins NOvocane?

Some guys from x looked into more than 70 millions spins and the worst session was 68/132. This system can handle even worse (65/135). We tested it with bayes horror sessions and so far It didn't crash.

[N0vocane]

Aleks - Because I want to see for myself. I've seen people claim some amazing things before and a lot of the time they have turned out to be false. Not saying that these guys are lying as I would love for this system to work but before I start investing time into it I would like to verify it for myself.

I also have a question regarding the progression. The Labby states that when you loose you add the sum of your bet to the end. If you start the labby with 0001, the bet is one and the sum of the bet is one. so it goes 0001,00011,000111. The sum is always one because your adding the first and last numbers together. Where are you getting the progression?

[Fripper]

Aleks - Because I want to see for myself. I've seen people claim some amazing things before and a lot of the time they have turned out to be false. Not saying that these guys are lying as I would love for this system to work but before I start investing time into it I would like to verify it for myself.

I also have a question regarding the progression. The Labby states that when you lose you add the sum of your bet to the end. If you start the labby with 0001, the bet is one and the sum of the bet is one. so it goes 0001,00011,000111. The sum is always one because your adding the first and last numbers together. Where are you getting the progression?

It would be amazing to code this in RX. I'm afraid that it is very hard but who knows, maybe we have one in here that can do it.

We play in pairs (2 bets) to keep the losing streaks short.

We also use a mini-martingle.
If you lose the first bet in a pair, double the next.

So in this case:
(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1)
First bet is 1+0 = 1 unit
Ok, we lose so double. 1*2 = 2 units
We lose again, we have lose 1+2= 3 units

New labby is:
(0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,1,2)
Bet is: 2+0 = 2 units
Lose, so double again. 2*2 = 4 units
We lose again. we have lost 2+4 units = 6 units /2 = 3

So new labby is:
(0,0,0,0,0,1,1,2,3,3)


And so on.

Cheers

[aleks06]

N0vocane you should read this thread reply#34

link:://rouletteforum.x/index.php?PHPSESSID=86be27f1adb373c64b354b8b01a8d0dc&topic=9.msg222#new

Someone seems to have made a RX code.

[Fripper]

N0vocane you should read this thread reply#34

link:://rouletteforum.x/index.php?PHPSESSID=86be27f1adb373c64b354b8b01a8d0dc&topic=9.msg222#new

Someone seems to have made a RX code.

Yes, it is for the Johnsson progression.

He said he would do it for Belgians way of play to.

[aleks06]

Session 11

+15 profit

lowest point : -447

Highest bet : 84

236 spins



We cleared the 11 bayes horror sessions   !!!

Can anyone provide worse ?

[GLC]

Fellas,

To me this is very exciting.  But, I'm trying to reconcile how the zeros make a difference.  It seems to me that all the zeros do is cause you to play like D'Alembert except that you play a 2 step marty whenever you lose.

My next question is, "Why do you skip the 2nd bet after a win?"  It seems that you could continue to bet as long as you're winning and when you do lose a bet, the next bet is double the lost bet.

Is this really any different than say playing a normal labby and whenever you lose a bet and you have to bet an amount larger than you're comfortable with, you just put that number aside and any others that are too big and once you finish the labby you're working on, you can then bring out these large number losses and create another labby out of them and work thru them 1 at a time or comibine 2 or 3 into 1 labby.  You can do this indefinitely until you go into a good winning streak when you should be able to clear away the excess losses.

Example:  I will never bet more than 15 units.

1   Start with the unit we want to win.  First bet is 1 unit.  Keep betting 1 until we lose.

1  1  After 1st loss, bet sum of 1st and last numbers.  Lose.

1  1  2  Bet 3    Lose

1  1  2  3   Bet 4  Lose

1  1  2  3  4  Bet 5  Win

1  2  3   Bet 4  Lose

1  2  3  4  Bet 5 Win

2  3   Bet 5 Lose

2  3  5  Bet 7 Lose

2  3  5  7  Bet 9  Win

3  5   Bet 8  Lose

3  5  8  Bet 11  Lose

3  5  8  11  Bet 14  Lose

3  5  8  11  14  Since I cannot bet more than 15 units, I set the 14 aside and bet 14 again,  lose

3  5  8  11  14  Same as above  bet I set 14 aside and bet 3+11=14 again.  Win

5  8    Bet is 13  Win.  Line is cleared except for the two 14 units bets I set aside.

I now create a new labby with the first 14 unit loss.

2  2  3  3  2  2   Bet  4   win

2  3  3  2   Bet 4  Lose

2  3  3  2  4  Bet 6  Win

3  3  2  Bet 5  win

3   Bet 3  Win

Etc... 

This too can become a real grind and may take a couple of hundred spins to finally clear all our losses,  but that's seems to be what the zeros do.

Not trying to undermine your system, I just don't understand it well enough to see that it's that much better than the above.

I will try to clear horror session #7 with the above method and see if it can be done within a reasonable number of spins if ever.  I will change my maximum bet level to more than 15, but I don't know how much more yet.  Don't have time to do it immediately, but I will do it as soon as possible.

Wish me luck, (or maybe not?)

George

[albalaha]

Hey Dear Marcus,
           I could not be more impressed by any other EC methods but still fail to understand it fully. I am providing here a small session of 185 spins taken from live slingshot roulette of smart live casino. Please play this here in simple language and not in excel sheet. Think you are taking a tutorial of your roulette technique to a layman.

[attachimg=#]

Maybe after understanding the complete technique I could suggest some valuable tweaks to make it lesser risky and quickwinner.

[ADulay]

Can I assume that 31 was the last number to show and 19 was the oldest?

AD