• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Odds and payouts are different things. If either the odds or payouts don't change, then the result is the same - eventual loss.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Method must study it propely

Started by vile, Jun 11, 11:18 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

atlantis

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 11, 03:46 PM 2012
After a while atlantis you will say :

"I am losing badly with this system but its Nice and easy to play. I like it. " ;D

That's Ok Master, to prevent large losses I will play it hit - n - run   :xd:   >:D   >:D :twisted:
A.
Thru the darkness of Future Past the magician longs to see. One chants out between two worlds:
"Fire -- Walk with me!"

vile

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 11, 03:39 PM 2012
""""""No it doesn't,but also as you can see from the attachment only
twice lost 4 times in the roe in more then 500 spins......
DID YOU EVER SEE THAT BETTING RED BLACK?????""""""""""


I have seen a lot more strange things in roulette outcomes,,,this is nothing

Dear MOP,glad that you did,but it seems you don't grasp my thoughts,but never mind.
I have no time to argue here,and btw...I play this 7 months,with constant winnings,and
didn't had intention of posting,but got sick of these matrixes,which provely don't work,so decided to give you some food for your thoughts.Therefore don't give me roulette lectures,instead test this
propely and find out for yourself.And I have seen strange things in my almost 50 years constant
playings.....but this I haven't seen as yet.......Do you get what  I mean now.Do some walks then talk.

vile


vile

Quote from: Master_of_pockets on Jun 11, 04:15 PM 2012
LoL....
read for urself..... don't be lazy
And you test for yourself instead of waisting my time,am in Kiew now.
Ukraine-Sweden

6th-sense

ok for the couple of emails who don't know how to use my program heres a quick video i hope it works i got no microphone but use my instructions and watch video

link:://:.youtube.com/watch?v=BY9FHK31ngI&feature=youtu.be# 

Bayes

Thanks for sharing, FLAT/Vile. Any system posted by a genuine pro has to be worth a look.
"The trouble isn't what we don't know, it's what we think we know that just ain't so!" - Mark Twain

warrior

GLC modified dambert,would be a nice touch to this.

albertojonas

Thank you sir for making this public.
In fact a very huge fan of yours showed me this some time ago. I wonder if it will be hyped...

Nice to have you.

Cheers,

AL

Colbster

Enjoying this with a standard D'Alembert, actually.  Makes me think that there might be some merit in running a differential bet with this: Last 3 to show repeat vs. last 3 to show not repeat.  I think this bet selection has the back and forth that might make a differential profitable.  Maybe throw in my dynamic differential betting to swap as one side or the other moves ahead and play to the strength of the trend.

Tomla021

Kind of fun practised a hundred spins----good work
"No Whining, just Winning"

StackBundles

seeing as i noticed football talk on ere i thought you could build your bank up with these 2 bets that are not going to lose!!
Russia to beat poland odds are crazy 2.44!!! 2nd bet is to bet over 2.5 goals @ 2.06 in the germany vs netherlands game netherlands have a poor defense but good attacking germany will sure score some goals!

Wally Gator

Somebody want to check this .....  additional spins provided if you want to continue. 


Spins 300+
B & M (Mohegan Sun)
Wheel: 00
High +51
Low -927


Probably playing it wrong .... appreciate the direction.
A person with a new idea is a crank until the idea succeeds. ~ Mark Twain

flukey luke

Always happy to try something slightly different.

1
2
5
3 bet 2,5,3 x 1.
4 -1. Bet 5,3,4 x 2.
6 -3. Bet 3,4,6 x 3.
1 -6. Bet 4,6,1 x 4.
5 -10. Bet 6,1,5 x5.
3 -15. Bet 1,5,3 x 6.
4 -21. Bet 5,3,4 x 7.
6 -28. Bet 3,4,6 x 8.
2 -36. Bet 4,6,2 x 9.
4 -27. n.b.
1 n.b. bet 2,4,1 x 8.
4 -19. n.b.
1 n.b.
1 n.b.
3 n.b.
6 n.b.
3 n.b.
1 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 bet 1,5,2 x 7.
3 -26. Bet 5,2,3 x 8.
6 -34. Bet 2,3,6 x 9.
1 -43. Bet 3,6,1 x 10.
3 -33. n.b.
4 bet 1,3,4 x 9.
4 -24. n.b.
4 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 n.b.
6 bet 5,2,6 x 8.
2 -16. n.b.
6 n.b.
3 n.b.
1 bet 6,3,1 x 7.
4 -23. Bet 3,1,4 x 8.
2 -31. Bet 1,4,2 x 9.
6 -40. Bet 4,2,6 x 10.
4 -30. n.b.
1 bet 6,4,1 x 9.
6 -21. n.b.
3 bet 1,6,3 x 8.
1 -13. n.b.
3 n.b.
1 n.b.
3 n.b.
6 n.b.
5 bet 3,6,5 x 7.
5 -6. n.b.
6 n.b.
2 n.b.
4 n.b.
2 n.b.
3 n.b.
3 n.b.
4 n.b.
3 n.b.
5 n.b.
2 bet 3,5,2 x 6.
1 -12. Bet 5,2,1 x 7.
5 -5. n.b.
2 n.b.
6 bet 5,2,6 x 6.
6 +1. WINNER.

It made a good comeback considering it lost the first 8 bets.

StackBundles

Question
if we get these results
2 4 5 3 we bet 4 5 3 then it comes 1 so thats a loss do we now bet 5 3 1 or stay with 4 5 3


flukey luke

Stackbundles,  looking at this example from Vile suggests we always use the three newest.

It is so simply self explained in attachement.BUT HERE;

2,
4,
3,
6.....trigg.
2-l-trigg..4,3,6,....3 ch -  bet 2 ch.
3.w...n.b.              6+..................................3+
1.nb..trigg.6,2,3,
5..l-...trigg.2,3,1,.....3-bet 2 ch.                 0-
4..l-...trigg3.,1,5,.....6-bet 3 ch.                 6-
1..w..n.b.                  9+bet 2 ch                 3+
6..nb..trigg.5.,4,1,
4..w..nb..                  6+bet 1 ch.                9+




A small twist would be to turn it into a dozens bet by seeing where the win came in the previous three double streets.

My example produced the following....

1,2,1,3,2,1,1,1,3,1,3.

You could leave out the furthest back of the three.



-