Repeats Prog Method

[Roulettebeater]

for example sequence between ID 41859 and 41878 has the following numbers:

     NUM
--------
      34
      27
      28
      35
      36
       0
      24
      29
      26
      13
      33

     NUM
--------
      20
      14
      16
      12
      11
       1
      19
      25
      31

This is a case where Andre method fails! but i repeat its a very rare case

[denzie]

Now do the math RB 

[cht]

Roulettebeater, either you do the math to know it loses or you learn from a real money loss. Not dissing you or Andre.

[Roulettebeater]

Now do the math RB 

yea, i think long term is gonna be profitable.
the progression might go broke 1 out of 1000

so suppose you will play 999 winning games in a month and make on average 24 chips per  game .. Total 999 * 24= 23976.

You will lose 1 game which will cost you 450 chips

[cht]

yea, i think long term is gonna be profitable.
the progression might go broke 1 out of 1000

so suppose you will play 999 winning games in a month and make on average 24 chips per  game .. Total 999 * 24= 23976.

You will lose 1 game which will cost you 450 chips

Your test is correct, you math model is incorrect. It requires more test. Think what I'm saying to you.

[Roulettebeater]

Your test is correct, you math model is incorrect. It requires more test. Think what I'm saying to you.

go on, say where the problem with the math.

thx

[cht]

so suppose you will play 999 winning games in a month and make on average 24 chips per  game .. Total 999 * 24= 23976.

You will lose 1 game which will cost you 450 chips

Win 23976 against loss of 450 ? Possible ?

You're taking short cut with assumptions with no basis for your model.

You need to test every permutation to fill in the details.

[Madi]

U dont need to test everything. Ur eyes can see the potential. Saying reality is not a naysayer.

[Roulettebeater]

Win 23976 against loss of 450 ? Possible ?

1 los out of 1000

won games =999  ;  Proft earned 999 * 24    ;  24 is average here as you bet 12 chips going up to 8 steps progression
Lost game=1 ; Loss = Total of 8 Steps progession

where the problem???

[cht]

1 los out of 1000
wrong assumption

won games =999  ;  Proft earned 999 * 24    ;  24 is average
wrong average
here as you bet 12 chips going up to 8 steps progression
Lost game= 1
wrong assumption
; Loss = Total of 8 Steps progession

where the problem???

[cht]

U dont need to test everything. Ur eyes can see the potential. Saying reality is not a naysayer.

You still need a working brain.

[Roulettebeater]

; Loss = Total of 8 Steps progession

you funny !

1 out 1000 is wrong for you !

for me (within my test, i just need to issue a query to validate anything) i can say its true !

anywa, i dont want to fight with u

cheers

[cht]

you funny !

1 out 1000 is wrong for you !

for me (within my test) i can say its true !

anywa, i dont want to fight with u

cheers

You made an interpretation mistake on your test result. Like I said I don't doubt your test result.

[Roulettebeater]

You made an interpretation mistake on your test result. Like I said I don't doubt your test result.

bro, if you trust my tests why you still jumping over my shoulders and say it doesnt win!
the probabilty for a miss is low and the hits are much higher

[cht]

bro, if you trust my tests why you still jumping over my shoulders and say it doesnt win!
the probabilty for a miss is low and the hits are much higher

Trusting your test result is not the same as believing it wins betting Andre's way.

I'm trying to help here. Take time off then come back later to read your assumption -
1. 1000 games played
2. 999 games win
3. 1 loss

Is that what your test result tell you ?