Repeats Prog Method

[Roulettebeater]

Just point me to the nearest pop-corn factory.
we gonna get plenty of fun

[Roulettebeater]

Trusting your test result is not the same as believing it wins betting Andre's way.

I'm trying to help here. Take time off the come back later to read your assumption -
1. 1000 games played
2. 999 games win
3. 1 loss

Is that what your test result tell you ?

I have found only 127 sequence that violates Andre's method in a DB that contains 100k spins

get the conclusion from this test by yourself

[cht]

I have found only 127 sequence that violates Andre's method in a DB that contains 100k spins

get the conclusion from this test by yourself

I tried to help you, calm down and think through it again later.

I wonder if anyone else understand what I'm talking about. Never mind.

[Andre Chass]

So you have 12 numbers in your selection. 8 step progression. HOPING the repeat come from those 12 and NOT from the next numbers. I can guarantee it will lose. Why? Been there and done that while breaking my head on the WTF thread last year. Sure you can go long without a loss. But after 1000 cycles you will be in a loss just as i was. Not dissing anyone but just telling what ive seen. 

Please read the thread.

I wait for 12 uniques and bet them.

Step 1: bet 12 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 2: bet 13 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 3: bet 14 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
Step 4: bet 15 uniques. If no hit add the last number shown.
And so on...

I'm testing it playing real money. I know a table that allows 30 cents minimum bets.

I'm using a progression of 8 steps 1,1,2,3,4,6,9,14.

[Roulettebeater]

I tried to help you, calm down and think through it again later.

bro, i am eating popcorn right now, i am too much relaxed

[cht]

bro, i am eating popcorn right now, i am too much relaxed

If you do it correctly you can make the exact calculations to determine the outcome.

RB I'm not dissing you, just telling you what it is.

[Andre Chass]

Roulettebeater, either you do the math to know it loses or you learn from a real money loss. Not dissing you or Andre.

CHT, let me ask you something!

If you dont trust the strategy then what are you doing here in this thread? This place is for sharing ideas and improving the strategy. You dont know which side you are on. One hour you say the strategy is great, and now all you do is criticize the strategy. What's up?

[Roulettebeater]

Andre,

i just did a new test, even with adding an additional number to the cycle every round, i have got 113 sequences that doesnt satisfy the method.

these 113 are considered total loss !

but remember that 113 or even 127 out of 100k is peanuts!!!!

[cht]

CHT, let me ask you something!

If you dont trust the strategy then what are you doing here in this thread? This place is for sharing ideas and improving the strategy. You dont know which side you are on. One hour you say the strategy is great, and now all you do is criticize the strategy. What's up?

Read my post on your thread carefully.

I wrote all my post with details. There were no broadbrush assumptions made. I tell it as it should be. There are no sides to take except to be on the correct side of facts and reality.

Andre and RB, I'm trying to help here. Not in any way against either of you. At worst we can agree to disagree.

Final word, if you bet it optimally you will have a low risk high reward bet. Bet it with martingale style 8steps progression the math says it lose itlr.

I'm out of here. Good luck Andre with your bets.

[Roulettebeater]

tests showed that in 127 the 8 progression has busted and in 99873 a HIT has been achieved within the 8 steps progressions

how did you came out with your conculsion that using progression it will lose?

[cht]

tests showed that in 127 the 8 progression has busted and in 99873 a HIT has been achieved within the 8 steps progressions

how did you came out with your conculsion that using progression it will lose?

Like I said earlier, you made an error of interpretation. I can't help anymore than I have done on this thread.

[Andre Chass]

tests showed that in 127 the 8 progression has busted and in 99873 a HIT has been achieved within the 8 steps progressions

how did you came out with your conculsion that using progression it will lose?

The fact is: The method wins more than it loses.

I am playing this method for hours for several days and I haven't had losses so far.

[Roulettebeater]

I'm playing this method for hours for several days and I've still had losses so far.

I believe you as well as my tests.

however the bot doesnt work properly on a play mode roulette table.
it has scanned all numbers correctly, but it doesnt place the chips on numbers when i click on BET

[Andre Chass]

But after 1000 cycles you will be in a loss just as i was.

So the method is great!

[Andre Chass]

I believe you as well as my tests.

however the bot doesnt work properly on a play mode roulette table.
it has scanned all numbers correctly, but it doesnt place the chips on numbers when i click on BET

Please create a specific topic to talk about bots