• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Funny Sequences

Started by Priyanka, Apr 25, 07:10 AM 2017

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Scarface

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Apr 26, 09:10 PM 2017
Scarface,
I was also thinking the same thing that recording the sequences by using the last spin of the previous sequence as the first spin of the next sequence leads to HL and LH being equal.

Your analogy of Red always following Black is great!

Yes, it really is pretty simple to see.  Not sure  why PrI would run a total of 25,000 spins to test this  :ooh:

RouletteGhost

Did you guys know that in three spins red or black must repeat

Did you also know that in 4 spins a dozen MUST repeat

Minus 0 of course

Using this information combined with unrelated scientific principles I've found the holy grail
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Scarface

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 26, 10:13 PM 2017
Did you guys know that in three spins red or black must repeat

Did you also know that in 4 spins a dozen MUST repeat

Minus 0 of course

Using this information combined with unrelated scientific principles I've found the holy grail

Nice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime  :)

RouletteGhost

the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

poobear

Quote from: Priyanka on Apr 25, 08:04 AM 2017
This I believe stems from the way we have constructed the High and low sequences by making each of the sequence that is coming out dependent on the way previous sequence has turned out.

Hi, new here. I think everyone is missing the point. All Priyanka has done is provide "an" example, not "the" example, of a way to make your own sequence of numbers.

Look at it as a thinking exercise.

nottophammer

Quote from: poobear on Apr 27, 01:11 AM 2017
Hi, new here. I think everyone is missing the point. All Priyanka has done is provide "an" example, not "the" example, of a way to make your own sequence of numbers.

Look at it as a thinking exercise.
So still chance,   :thumbsup:
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

Priyanka

Quote from: Scarface on Apr 26, 10:31 PM 2017ice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime  :)
Scarface - Indeed a good one. Sometimes, great ideas come from things that are very obvious.

I was asked a question "Why am I here" by Turner. Of course, it lets you think and I realised am here to learn. We all know that this is a negative expectation game. We all know that any method that is based on spins is a losing system, as the spins are independent and it is not going to impact their expectation (odds as some people put it). So we have two options from here. One - Move on! Many people have done and even I have done it in the past multiple times only to come back. Two - Rather than trying out the same thing day in and day out, try out new things. That new thing might fail, it might lead us no where. But hey! did doing the same thing over and over again lead us anywhere?

I started this thread as a way to see if there are any anamolies in the sequences. If there is a way you can construct things to see if there is an anamoly. Playability and practicability might not be there in the example that i gave. Am looking for some group sourcing as Still puts it and see where it takes us.

Please do ask yourself the question "Why are you here". If the answer makes you interest in this topic, please do contribute. If it doesnt, my humble request is if not encouraging people, at least do not discourage. Cheers!
Disclaimer : Roulette systems are subject to laws of probability. If you are not sure about the effects of it, please refer to link:://:.genuinewinner.com/truth. Don't get robbed by scammers.

RouletteGhost

There's an internal coup here who is sick and tired of clues and theories and bait

That's all

Show me via a real life example, how knowing a color will repeat within 3 spins helps you play roulette
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

Quoteice discovery!  I got one for you:  Red will ALWAYS follow black if you disregard repeats.  I tested this for 1 million spins and it works everytime

I've tested billions of RNG spins for any particular sequence of red and black that occurs more often than expected, and the result was no such sequence exists. If you found otherwise, what is the exact sequence you mean?

Quote from: Priyanka on Apr 27, 06:37 AM 2017We all know that this is a negative expectation game

But dont you claim to consistently beat roulette? Certainly some people are convinced you have the HG and just dont want to tell people. Partly this is influenced by your exploitation of the game cheating loophole. Priyanka, it's not personal. But you have a few followers and maybe you should come clean - do you or do you not claim to have the HG? (a system that wins perpetually - the kind that can make anyone millions) I dont think you have either said yes or no. I think you try to avoid answering. But this is like foreplay for your followers who hang on your words. If you dont have the HG, then the moral thing is to set them straight rather than remain silent and mislead people.

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Apr 27, 06:42 AM 2017There's an internal coup here who is sick and tired of clues and theories and bait

You get trolls and baiters on almost every forum. Then there's people who just spew garbage everytime they post and cant even back their claims up with simple facts. One such person is Blue Angel. But there are others like of course Falkor. As in real life, it's the minority. But in real life you can just walk away. On a forum you want to learn at, you could ignore them but they still leave a trail of crap. So it's up to admin and moderators to enforce rules to keep a balanced forum.

Anyway with Falkor I've just moderate his posts. He can post whatever he wants, but if there's more of the vague baiting and gibberish, it wont be published. I don't think completely banning him is the best action. At least the moderation encourages him to be productive and stop pissing people off, or go elsewhere.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

Scarface

Quote from: Steve on Apr 27, 06:58 AM 2017
I've tested billions of RNG spins for any particular sequence of red and black that occurs more often than expected, and the result was no such sequence exists. If you found otherwise, what is the exact sequence you mean?

Steve, I wasn't serious.  Just poking fun at this thread for stating something obvious.  I said red will always follow black if you ignore the repeats.....bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbr....see, just ignore all those repeats of black and red will come up next 100% of the time (just a joke  :)

Steve

Don't screw with my head. Sometimes there's so much nonsense being posted on forums its hard to know who's serious.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

RouletteGhost

I knew right away you were being sarcastic. I'm from New York it's part of our culture
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Scarface on Apr 27, 07:14 AM 2017
Steve, I wasn't serious.  Just poking fun at this thread for stating something obvious.  I said red will always follow black if you ignore the repeats.....bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbr....see, just ignore all those repeats of black and red will come up next 100% of the time (just a joke  :))

It's the whole cycle thing

I used to be a spectator until I realized it helps with nothing

Ok so..... dozens.... 121 cycle ends cause 1 repeated

So?

Knowing a dozen will repeat guaranteed in four spins? So?

How does this help
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

bigmoney

A dozen is not guarenteed to repeat in 4 spins
GIDDY UP N GO GO

RouletteGhost

Quote from: bigmoney on Apr 27, 07:42 AM 2017
A dozen is not guarenteed to repeat in 4 spins

Correct

Pesky 0

The only point im making is that there are people who thinks this can be used to an advantage

How? Doesn't make sense
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

-