Dyksexlic, proof of identity

[Ka2]

mine either. . .  I'm starting to believe we are not dealing with the real Dyksexlic here.  Wich is not very hard to solve.

D, you and I talked (via pm) about another mathematical principle on the VLS forum, wich one were we talking about?

[VLS]

This post I rescued from the Recycle Bin since there is a new member claiming to be the real Dyksexlic.

In order to give Dyksexlic followers a chance, I have brought this back to test the claims of the new Dyksexlic.

Wich is not very hard to solve.

So the deal is, your first post is you answer what you talked with KA2 or you are out since you are a Fake. Simple.

No flamboyant posts, no "why can't I post anything else before answering KA2", no nothing else.

Sorry it has to be like this, but you would understand given all the controversy under the name.

So KA2, that's it you as a Dyksexlic follower can now DIRECTLY weed-out the field so to speak.

[Dyksexlic!]

Thanks Victor,


I spoke to Ilan (Ka2) a number of times about several mathematical concepts on VLS.  I'm uncertain which one he is referring to.  Perhaps he could be more specific?

As you can imagine, I received many pm messages from several members. 

While I keep all previous posts, I do not have a facility for saving personal messages.

However, there is a far easier way to prove my identity, if you remember you published my IP address on the old VLS ?

An IP address is a more accurate means of online identity.

I would really like to start a thread explaining the pigeonhole principle in detail with some real mathematical examples.  Again, this would be hard for a 'fake' to replicate.

[VLS]

Perhaps he could be more specific?

Kindly don't mention them in public dear KA2.

[VLS]

Thanks Victor,

You are welcome.

there is a far easier way to prove my identity, if you remember you published my IP address on the old VLS ?

An IP address is a more accurate means of online identity.

This time and age an IP address means nothing. Even the same IP changes for the same computer on the same house when turning the modem off and on.

Better for you because the IP addresses DO NOT MATCH...

In this post:

link:://vlsroulette.com/general-board/dyksexlic's-rng-roulette-demo-hate-free-zone-!!

I can see the following:

[attachthumb=#]
(Click here to enlarge and view in full - IP address @ lower-right corner)

link:://whois.domaintools.com/149.254.56.165

The provider is T-MOBILE.

...In your message here 94.5.24.228

link:://whois.domaintools.com/94.5.24.228

[attachthumb=#]
(Click here to enlarge and view in full  - IP address @ lower-right corner)

The provider is Sky.

Not even the Internet Providers Match, so let's keep IP verification out, for your own "benefit of the doubt".

I would really like to start a thread explaining the pigeonhole principle in detail with some real mathematical examples.  

By all means.

Again, this would be hard for a 'fake' to replicate.

Wikipedia already did!

link:://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeonhole_principle

[Ka2]

Oke Dyksexlic, once more I give you the benefit of the doubt. 

We spoke a couple of weeks ago at the VLS forum.  I asked a few questions.  The one about  maths you don't seem to remember.  But that's not all I asked, at that time you seemed to have some sort of problem, which I could probably solve for you.  But unfortunately you got banned again before we could discuss it.  What was your problem?

Second question:

You had a couple of  aliases on the vls and other forums.  What were they?

Last question:

On the old VLS forum you once spoke of giving a second demonstration in a real B&M casino which B&M casino where you talking about?

(If you dont want to answer my questions here, you can p. m. ) And I'll be honest If they were true or not. )

[VLS]

OK, there you go.

No beating around the bush.

Here is your opportunity to prove you are the real deal. Go straight to the point, check excuses at the door.

If you next post is an excuse, consider yourself banned.



I think I speak for the whole forum when saying I'm tired of these time-wasting schemes.

We only want a Roulette debate Forum with no silly games.

[MrJ]

I love this stuff.


Ken

[Dyksexlic!]

OK, there you go. 

Here is your opportunity to prove you are the real deal.  I think I speak for the whole forum when saying I'm tired of these time-wasting schemes.

We only want a Roulette debate Forum with no silly games.

I agree Victor, I'm sick of people stealing my hard work then dragging my name through the dirt.

This is insane. .  I'm Dyksexlic. . !

I have sent Ka2 a pm which FULLY answers all his questions.

Only the real ME (Dyksexlic) would know this information.

Ka2 will post his verdict.

[Ka2]

Oke D has answered me, and indeed he gave me the correct answer.  So that means he was the last "Alias" (HughdeMann) I spoke to on the old VLS forum.

He doesnt seem to remember about which casino I was revering to.  However I have to admit that it was a long time ago.

So if we assume that HughdeMann was in indeed D, then there is nothing to worry about.  However I still want to WARN everyone that if you still get a pm from D or someone else who has the bet, and they want to "sell" it to you in one way or another.  Don't ever take the bait!!! (Just take a quick look at the W3M scam)

The original D never wanted to sell ANYTHING that was his very first post he made, and he always sticked by that rule. 

[VLS]

Oke D has answered me, and indeed he gave me the correct answer.

So, you are positive this is the original Dyksexlic.

[Ka2]

I cant be 100% sure ofcourse, if the VLS alias was a fake, so would be this one.  That's why I gave the warning.  But the alias on VLS seemed the genuine D to me.

[VLS]

Oh well, then the account without the (!) mark remains locked.



Anyway, if this is the original one his further posts should show for itself.

Case closed, at least from my side. All I have to ask Dyksexlic is not to "stir the pot". Come, talk, debate and have fun.

He has indeed an audience eager to continue to debate with him and know more about what he has to say. Out of respect to Dyksexlic's readers we should all relax and remember it's about HAVING FUN & ENJOYING AROUND!

Regards.

[Skakus]

He doesn't seem to remember about which casino I was revering to.  However I have to admit that it was a long time ago.

Hello Ka2,

I had little to do with Dyksexlic on VLS, but can clearly remember Melbourne's Crown Casino in Australia being named as the demonstration venue.

If I am correct, then my recall of such a fleeting fact puts the member claiming to be Dyksexlic in very poor light, especially because he claims to keep ALL past posts.

So it's either not Dyksexlic, or it is Dyksexlic but he's full of sh*t! Meaning he never intended to go to Crown Casino, and when dishonest people weave a web of lies they invariably get caught out down the track.

To be honest, I don't know why people persist with him. He's been the catalyst for far too much conflict on virtually every roulette forum to merit any more chances (in my opinion).  

[Ka2]

I'm sorry but that was not the casino he was talking about! He lives in the UK so going to Australia doesn't make any sense either.

As well I clearly remembered that you were one of the pesky naysayers on the VLS forum.  Luckily on this forum that kind of behaviour is not allowed!