• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Every system can win in the short-term. It just depends on the spins you play.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

CHALLENGE FOR ALL--must see and participate if you wana be winner-Yes SAM,it can

Started by F_LAT_INO, Aug 03, 11:54 AM 2012

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ashwinsinha

Quote from: artattack on Oct 01, 06:59 PM 2012
Hi Ash


This clicker may be of use to you.


link:://rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10153.0

thanks for the reply art..... the link is coming up as error..... but i think i am going to master the splits 1-18...... and write it down near my pc..... then i am going to do some practice play on virtuall roulette to increase my skill,before i move on to real money live dealer roulette  ;D.... anyways thanks for ur help :thumbsup:

TwoCatSam

FLATman

I first want to thank you for taking on the task of accepting cold numbers from members and using them.  People who use any permazen can shop for the right one to fit their needs. 

Anyway, while my wife is recuperating and I cannot play live, I will do some serious testing of your theories using my own numbers.

I have been trying to eliminate a preconceived notion I have:  Red/Black, Odd/Even or Large/Small would perform exactly the same.  But if they did and won, who cares?

Thanks for all your effort.

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

martinnng

Hi,
what size of the bankroll (how many units) do you recommend to play with? Betting from 1 unit.
When I'v read the possible drawdown is cca 400 units, so will be enough 1.000 units BR enough?
Thanks for reply.

VegasArick

Drawdown does not seem to be too bad with the initial few tests I am looking at.

I am sure Flat_ has more accurate info though martinnn.

I might try it live tonight.  Not as confident as I would like to be with switching over fast enough. 
We are born "broke"
We will die "broke"
Everything in between is "flucuation" !

biagle

Quote from: VegasArick on Oct 30, 11:44 PM 2012
Drawdown does not seem to be too bad with the initial few tests I am looking at.

I am sure Flat_ has more accurate info though martinnn.

I might try it live tonight.  Not as confident as I would like to be with switching over fast enough.

in last two days i made around 160euros with this. playing 0.5euro per split as starting bet.

VegasArick

I fell asleep last night, with the intent of taking a nap and slept all the way thru.

Gonna try again tonight.

Congrads on the 160 Euros biagle.
We are born "broke"
We will die "broke"
Everything in between is "flucuation" !

TwoCatSam

FLATman!

OK, I started my test of this idea.  Ran into a problem within 20 spins.  Don't know how to play it.

These are splits:
6<-----------------------the oldest split of the new splits.
12
18
3
5
1
14
11<-----------------the newest split of the new splits

..........................Above are the newest 9 splits.  I play them and lose.  Does the split that hit, one of the older ones, now become one of the newer ones?
2
4
7
8
9
10
13
15
17...........This split wins as one in the oldest group.

Here is the second question:  Does the #17 split now become the newest of the new splits?  Do I take out split 6 from the newest group and add the #6 split to the oldest?

I am going to work through your sheets a while and see if I can see what you're doing.  What I've described above seems logical to me, but that may not be how you play it.

I guess the easy way to ask this is:  Are you playing this on a rolling basis?

Any input greatly appreciated!!

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

TwoCatSam

Well, I can see you're NOT doing it that way!!

I am looking at it like this:  If you are betting for the newest splits and one of the oldest hits, he becomes the newest of the new and the oldest of the new becomes the newest of the old.

Where's my rum?

Sam
If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

Maan

Hi Sam and Iboba..what are you doing here mates??? It just seems like a popularitycontest. Why are you not reading random???

Cheers guys!

/M

Tamino

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Oct 31, 06:51 PM 2012
Well, I can see you're NOT doing it that way!!

I am looking at it like this:  If you are betting for the newest splits and one of the oldest hits, he becomes the newest of the new and the oldest of the new becomes the newest of the old.

Where's my rum?
Sam

Two cat Sam, You may have your rum but.....

Vodka and ice damage the kidneys
Rum and ice damage the liver
Whiskey and ice damage the heart.
Gin and ice damage the brain cells.
Cola and ice damage the teeth.


That damned ICE is a KILLER

TwoCatSam

I have spent four hours on this tonight with my "TwoCat Redneck Tracker".

I find my nine newest splits and mark them with nine magnets on the nine respective splits.  I also keep a paper chart of the numbers that came.  Then I'm ready to go.

As long as the nine newest are winning, I simply erase the older of the two splits that came.

4
x
x
x
4......I would erase the top 4.

When betting for a new and an old comes, take out the topmost number on the chart, remove the magnet from that split and put it on the one that just came.

When betting for old and new comes, scratch out the same split number above and do not move any magnets.

When betting for old and old comes, erase the top split number from the chart and move the magnet to the split that just came.

It's 2:30 in the morning and I feel 90 years old.

I'll review this tomorrow.

My first 100 spins were almost even and the longest LLL was five.

Sam


If dogs don't go to heaven, when I die I want to go where dogs go.  ...Will Rogers

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Nov 01, 03:36 AM 2012
I have spent four hours on this tonight with my "TwoCat Redneck Tracker".

I find my nine newest splits and mark them with nine magnets on the nine respective splits.  I also keep a paper chart of the numbers that came.  Then I'm ready to go.

As long as the nine newest are winning, I simply erase the older of the two splits that came.

4
x
x
x
4......I would erase the top 4.

When betting for a new and an old comes, take out the topmost number on the chart, remove the magnet from that split and put it on the one that just came.

When betting for old and new comes, scratch out the same split number above and do not move any magnets.

When betting for old and old comes, erase the top split number from the chart and move the magnet to the split that just came.

It's 2:30 in the morning and I feel 90 years old.

I'll review this tomorrow.

My first 100 spins were almost even and the longest LLL was five.

Sam


Good Sam,
I'm doing it writing two vertical lines from 1 to 36,when I GOT MY LAST 9,simply switching from
furtest to last,so am always having 9 numbers in vertical lines.You will eventually get to 9/10
loses in the row.......but since this should be played in cycles/Ifind 9 the best/couldn't hurt much
as the bet itself is very evenly balanced.Good luck.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: TwoCatSam on Oct 31, 05:53 PM 2012
FLATman!

OK, I started my test of this idea.  Ran into a problem within 20 spins.  Don't know how to play it.

These are splits:
6<-----------------------the oldest split of the new splits.
12
18
3
5
1
14
11<-----------------the newest split of the new splits...only 8 splits,so I WILL PUT NINTH
9

..........................Above are the newest 9 splits.  I play them and lose.  Does the split that hit, one of the older ones, now become one of the newer ones?EXACTLY LIKE THAT...the older one that hit goes to last/newest/and thr further number in last ones goes to further ones.
2-L-goes to 9 last,while 6 goes to 9 furthest.
4
7
8
9
10
13
15
17...........This split wins as one in the oldest group.

Here is the second question:  Does the #17 split now become the newest of the new splits?  Do I take out split 6 from the newest group and add the #6 split to the oldest?the 17 is oldest one if the previous numbers were from further group,but it would be new ones if prior numbers were also last.

I am going to work through your sheets a while and see if I can see what you're doing.  What I've described above seems logical to me, but that may not be how you play it.

I guess the easy way to ask this is:  Are you playing this on a rolling basis?

Any input greatly appreciated!!9 last,---trigger to bet--------hit furthest which you send to furthest,and furthest number from last 9 send to furthers.....just a swap of 2 numbers

Sam
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

F_LAT_INO

Quote from: Maan on Oct 31, 08:12 PM 2012
Hi Sam and Iboba..what are you doing here mates??? It just seems like a popularitycontest. Why are you not reading random???

Cheers guys!

/M


Dearest Maan........His highness WHEEL is doing it for us.
You can always get me on  
ivica.boban@ri.t-com.hr

ignatus

Thanks mr. FLAT seems like a great method. :)

The only thing i don't understand, what is a "missing split"? sry for my bad english and low intelligence LOL  ;D
If you like to donate link::[url="//paypal.me/ignatus1"]//paypal.me/ignatus1[/url]

"Focus on predicting wheel sectors where the ball is expected to land" ~Steve

-